PPL vs SR Stock Comparison
Compare PPL and SR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between PPL and SR?
SR leads the current stock comparison as Spire Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
PPL Corporation vs Spire Inc.
SR leads
SR leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Value, but the lead has narrowed from 10 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support SR, and its lead is narrowing.
PPL Corporation
Spire Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SR over PPL, 44 versus 41 as of Sep 11, 2026. SR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while PPL holds the stronger risk resilience profile. SR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. SR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare PPL Corporation and Spire Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare PPL and SR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value48 vs 58SR +10
- Risk Resilience57 vs 48PPL +9
- Momentum32 vs 35Even
- Quality34 vs 36Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor SR. SR’s edge is concentrated in value; PPL keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
New signals
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (3.0%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -13
New signals
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
SR's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PPL and SR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SR (Spire Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
PPL (PPL Corporation): the counter-case, on risk resilience, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SRSR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PPLPPL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SRSR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
PPLPPL on Risk Resilience, by 9 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | PPL | SR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +20.3% | +21.2% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +26.8% | +18.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 5 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 41 vs 44 |
| Fundamentals | PPLon balance | revenue growth -23.9% vs -58.8%; EPS growth -48.3% vs -22.6%; TTM ROE 8.5% vs 21.4%; gross margin 34.6% vs 32.7%; operating margin 24% vs 19.7% — PPL takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SR | Value 48 vs 58 |
| Technicals | SR | Price vs 50-day -3.8% vs -1.8%; vs 200-day -5.7% vs -4.3% |
| Risk Resilience | PPL | Risk Resilience 57 vs 48 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 20.3% vs 21.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PPL and SR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SR +3
- 41 vs 44
- 7 sessions ago
- SR +8
- 41 vs 49
- 30 sessions ago
- SR +10
- 43 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 47 vs 47
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Jul 6 when SR moved ahead of PPL.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.39%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (3.0%)
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (4.26%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.38%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.56%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PPL closes the Value gap — currently 10 points behind, the largest single contributor to SR's edge.
- 2PPL's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate SR's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
PPL leads on balance| Metric | PPL | SR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -23.9% | -58.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -48.3% | -22.6% |
| Gross margin | 34.6% | 32.7% |
| Operating margin | 24% | 19.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 8.5% | 21.4% |
| Debt to equity | 1.32 | 2.03 |
Performance
SR leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | PPL | SR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1% | -1.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.5% | -1.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.9% | 1.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -9.1% | -9.4% |
| Year to date | -1.8% | -1.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -4% | 8.6% |
Technicals
SR has the stronger structure| Metric | PPL | SR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 38.6 | 42.3 |
| ADX (14) | 11.8 | 11.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -3.8% | -1.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -5.7% | -4.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 17% | 18.2% |
Risk
PPL is the more resilient| Metric | PPL | SR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.03 | -0.18 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.37 | 0.27 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.59 | 0.41 |
| Max drawdown | -14.3% | -20.2% |
| Current drawdown | -14.1% | -14.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 17.9% | 19.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.8% | -2.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PPL or SR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 44 against PPL's 41. The edge comes from value. PPL is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PPL or SR the better buy right now?
SR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SR over PPL?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SR leads Value by 10 points; PPL leads Risk Resilience by 9 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PPL or SR?
Analyst price targets imply +20.3% upside for PPL and +21.2% for SR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PPL or SR?
SR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PPL or SR?
PPL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PPL or SR?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PPL or SR?
PPL is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PPL on Risk Resilience, by 9 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PPL more profitable than SR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 34.6% vs 32.7%; operating margin 24% vs 19.7%; ttm roe 8.5% vs 21.4%. PPL leads on two measures and SR on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SR's lead over PPL getting stronger or weaker?
SR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-06, when SR moved ahead of PPL.
What would change the PPL vs SR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PPL closes the Value gap — currently 10 points behind, the largest single contributor to SR's edge; PPL's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SR starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate SR's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about PPL and SR?
PPL: 0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral. SR: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on PPL is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SR it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare PPL and SR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.