PRIM vs WLDN Stock Comparison
Compare PRIM and WLDN across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between PRIM and WLDN?
WLDN leads the current stock comparison as Willdan Group, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Primoris Services Corporation vs Willdan Group, Inc.
WLDN leads
WLDN leads by 16 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 23 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors PRIM on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support WLDN, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Primoris Services Corporation
Willdan Group, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors WLDN over PRIM, 58 versus 42 as of Sep 11, 2026. WLDN's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. WLDN also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PRIM. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor WLDN today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. WLDN lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 23 to 16 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Primoris Services Corporation and Willdan Group, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare PRIM and WLDN against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality32 vs 64WLDN +32
- Risk Resilience41 vs 57WLDN +16
- Momentum30 vs 43WLDN +13
- Value64 vs 66Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor WLDN. WLDN’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
No new signals fired.
WLDN's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PRIM and WLDN both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
WLDN (Willdan Group, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
PRIM (Primoris Services Corporation): the counter-case, on analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 36.7% against 30.8%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
WLDNWLDN on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
WLDNWLDN on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
WLDNWLDN on the Momentum factor, by 13 points.
Lower downside
WLDNWLDN on Risk Resilience, by 16 points.
Analyst upside
PRIMPRIM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors WLDN, analyst targets favor PRIM. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | PRIM | WLDN | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +90.5% | +33.8% | PRIM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +78.1% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor WLDN. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | WLDN | 42 vs 58 |
| Fundamentals | WLDN | revenue growth 8.2% vs 48.9%; EPS growth -240.6% vs 179.3%; TTM ROE 8.5% vs 20.9%; gross margin 8.6% vs 37.8%; operating margin 3% vs 7.1% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 64 vs 66 |
| Technicals | WLDN | Price vs 50-day -8.5% vs 3.8%; vs 200-day -40.7% vs -11.5% |
| Risk Resilience | WLDN | Risk Resilience 41 vs 57 |
| Analyst expectations | PRIM | Target upside 90.5% vs 33.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PRIM and WLDN and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 16 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on WLDN.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10WLDN lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 23 to 16 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- WLDN +16
- 42 vs 58
- 7 sessions ago
- WLDN +23
- 41 vs 64
- 30 sessions ago
- WLDN +23
- 43 vs 66
- 90 sessions ago
- WLDN +10
- 42 vs 52
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on May 5 when WLDN moved ahead of PRIM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (49.68%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.78%)
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (16.93%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
WLDN leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.17%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.33%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PRIM closes the Quality gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to WLDN's edge.
- 2PRIM's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3WLDN's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 16-point move would eliminate WLDN's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
WLDN leads on balance| Metric | PRIM | WLDN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 8.2% | 48.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -240.6% | 179.3% |
| Gross margin | 8.6% | 37.8% |
| Operating margin | 3% | 7.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 8.5% | 20.9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.69 | 0.25 |
Performance
WLDN leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | PRIM | WLDN |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.7% | -6.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -10.4% | -3.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -22.3% | -15.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -45.4% | -2.4% |
| Year to date | -41.1% | -21% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -37.1% | -16.1% |
Technicals
WLDN has the stronger structure| Metric | PRIM | WLDN |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 35.1 | 38.6 |
| ADX (14) | 26.6 | 22.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -8.5% | 3.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -40.7% | -11.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 36.7% | 30.8% |
Risk
WLDN is the more resilient| Metric | PRIM | WLDN |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.94 | 1.71 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.12 | 0.01 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.11 | 0.01 |
| Max drawdown | -64.5% | -50.4% |
| Current drawdown | -64% | -39.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 79.3% | 61.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.6% | -4.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PRIM or WLDN?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, WLDN is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 58 against PRIM's 42. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PRIM or WLDN the better buy right now?
WLDN carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor WLDN over PRIM?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. WLDN leads Quality by 32 points; WLDN leads Risk Resilience by 16 points; WLDN leads Momentum by 13 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PRIM or WLDN?
Analyst price targets imply +90.5% upside for PRIM and +33.8% for WLDN, so the Street currently favors PRIM. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors WLDN. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PRIM or WLDN?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PRIM or WLDN?
WLDN on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PRIM or WLDN?
WLDN on the Momentum factor, by 13 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PRIM or WLDN?
WLDN is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. WLDN on Risk Resilience, by 16 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PRIM more profitable than WLDN?
WLDN leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 8.6% vs 37.8%; operating margin 3% vs 7.1%; ttm roe 8.5% vs 20.9%.
Is WLDN's lead over PRIM getting stronger or weaker?
WLDN lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 23 to 16 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-05-05, when WLDN moved ahead of PRIM.
What would change the PRIM vs WLDN verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PRIM closes the Quality gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to WLDN's edge; PRIM's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; WLDN's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 16-point move would eliminate WLDN's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about PRIM and WLDN?
PRIM: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. WLDN: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PRIM is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On WLDN it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare PRIM and WLDN with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.