PTC vs TEAM Stock Comparison
PTC currently leads TEAM in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 75 vs 53. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between PTC and TEAM?
PTC leads the current stock comparison as PTC Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
PTC Inc. vs Atlassian Corporation
PTC leads
PTC leads by 22 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support PTC, and its current signal state is conflicted.
PTC Inc.
Atlassian Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PTC over TEAM, 75 versus 53 as of Oct 21, 2026. PTC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value. PTC also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PTC today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. PTC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 22 points over 30 sessions. PTC leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare PTC Inc. and Atlassian Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare PTC and TEAM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality86 vs 43PTC +43
- Value63 vs 42PTC +21
- Risk Resilience54 vs 45PTC +9
- Momentum87 vs 82PTC +5
4 of 6 evidence groups favor PTC. PTC’s edge is concentrated in quality and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.8%)
PTC's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PTC and TEAM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PTC (PTC Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
TEAM (Atlassian Corporation): the counter-case, on fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PTCPTC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TEAMTEAM on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PTCPTC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 21 points.
Momentum
PTCPTC on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
PTCPTC on Risk Resilience, by 9 points.
Analyst upside
PTCPTC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | PTC | TEAM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -3.2% | -24.8% | PTC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +93.5% | +117.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 12 | 18 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PTC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PTC | 75 vs 53 |
| Fundamentals | TEAMon balance | revenue growth -22.5% vs -1.1%; EPS growth -79.1% vs 239.5%; TTM ROE 32.6% vs -4.4%; gross margin 84.1% vs 84.8% — TEAM takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PTC | Value 63 vs 42 |
| Technicals | TEAM | Price vs 50-day 24.8% vs 20.8%; vs 200-day 32.3% vs 89.8% |
| Risk Resilience | PTC | Risk Resilience 54 vs 45 |
| Analyst expectations | PTC | Target upside -3.2% vs -24.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PTC and TEAM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 22 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PTC.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20PTC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 22 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PTC +22
- 75 vs 53
- 7 sessions ago
- PTC +23
- 76 vs 53
- 30 sessions ago
- PTC +22
- 66 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- PTC +13
- 71 vs 58
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
6 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only TEAM
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.23%)
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.8%)
Both carry 6 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, Keltner Channel Breakout, RSI Overbought, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, Uptrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
PTC leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.53%, AIQ -1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.99%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TEAM closes the Quality gap — currently 43 points behind, the largest single contributor to PTC's edge.
- 2TEAM's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3PTC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TEAM leads on balance| Metric | PTC | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -22.5% | -1.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -79.1% | 239.5% |
| Gross margin | 84.1% | 84.8% |
| Operating margin | 37.8% | 0.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 32.6% | -4.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.46 | 1.16 |
Performance
TEAM leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | PTC | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.3% | 6.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 38.1% | 17.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 58.1% | 142.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 37.2% | 210.5% |
| Year to date | 11% | 28.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -4.3% | 46.2% |
Technicals
TEAM has the stronger structure| Metric | PTC | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 91.9 | 77.3 |
| ADX (14) | 46.7 | 30.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | 24.8% | 20.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 32.3% | 89.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 120.1% | 50.5% |
Risk
PTC is the more resilient| Metric | PTC | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.57 | 0.84 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.05 | 0.8 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.09 | 1.71 |
| Max drawdown | -45.4% | -67.5% |
| Current drawdown | -6.1% | 0% |
| Annualized volatility | 49.3% | 78.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.5% | -6.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PTC or TEAM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PTC is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 75 against TEAM's 53. The edge comes from quality and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PTC or TEAM the better buy right now?
PTC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PTC over TEAM?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PTC leads Quality by 43 points; PTC leads Value by 21 points; PTC leads Risk Resilience by 9 points. PTC leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by TEAM simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, PTC or TEAM?
Analyst price targets imply -3.2% upside for PTC and -24.8% for TEAM, so the Street currently favors PTC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PTC or TEAM?
PTC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PTC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 21 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PTC or TEAM?
TEAM on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PTC or TEAM?
PTC on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PTC or TEAM?
PTC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PTC on Risk Resilience, by 9 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PTC more profitable than TEAM?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 84.1% vs 84.8%; operating margin 37.8% vs 0.2%; ttm roe 32.6% vs -4.4%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is PTC's lead over TEAM getting stronger or weaker?
PTC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 22 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the PTC vs TEAM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TEAM closes the Quality gap — currently 43 points behind, the largest single contributor to PTC's edge; TEAM's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; PTC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about PTC and TEAM?
PTC: 5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. TEAM: 6 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TEAM it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare PTC and TEAM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.