PTEN vs RIG Stock Comparison
RIG currently leads PTEN in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 54 vs 49. The clearest difference is quality, while PTEN has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between PTEN and RIG?
RIG leads the current stock comparison as Transocean Ltd., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. vs Transocean Ltd.
RIG leads
RIG leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from PTEN.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support RIG, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
Transocean Ltd.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors RIG over PTEN, 54 versus 49 as of Oct 21, 2026. RIG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while PTEN holds the stronger value profile. RIG also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RIG today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. RIG lead: Reversed — PTEN led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; RIG now leads by 5.
Compare Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. and Transocean Ltd. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare PTEN and RIG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value61 vs 37PTEN +24
- Quality30 vs 51RIG +21
- Momentum58 vs 79RIG +21
- Risk Resilience50 vs 50Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor RIG. RIG’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; PTEN keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum -21
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
The lead changed hands: RIG moved ahead of PTEN in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PTEN and RIG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
RIG (Transocean Ltd.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
PTEN (Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
RIGRIG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
RIGRIG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PTENPTEN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points.
Momentum
RIGRIG on the Momentum factor, by 21 points.
Lower downside
RIGRIG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
RIGRIG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | PTEN | RIG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +11.3% | +15.9% | RIG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +46.2% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RIG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | RIG | 49 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | RIGon balance | revenue growth 9.9% vs -10.6%; EPS growth 14% vs 134.4%; TTM ROE -2.8% vs -20.2%; gross margin 14.2% vs 74.3%; operating margin -1.1% vs 22.2% — RIG takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PTEN | Value 61 vs 37 |
| Technicals | PTEN | Price vs 50-day -1% vs 6.9%; vs 200-day 12.4% vs 0.8% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 50 vs 50 |
| Analyst expectations | RIG | Target upside 11.3% vs 15.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PTEN and RIG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on RIG.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20RIG lead: Reversed — PTEN led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; RIG now leads by 5.
- Today
- RIG +5
- 49 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- PTEN +3
- 49 vs 46
- 30 sessions ago
- PTEN +2
- 42 vs 40
- 90 sessions ago
- PTEN +1
- 54 vs 53
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Oct 20 when RIG moved ahead of PTEN.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 0 bearish / 3 neutral
Only PTEN
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (13.87%)
- EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only RIG
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.17%)
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, MACD Bullish Crossover.
RIG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 6 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.39%, AIQ -6 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.78%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PTEN closes the Quality gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to RIG's edge.
- 2PTEN's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3RIG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
RIG leads on balance| Metric | PTEN | RIG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.9% | -10.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 14% | 134.4% |
| Gross margin | 14.2% | 74.3% |
| Operating margin | -1.1% | 22.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -2.8% | -20.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.41 | 0.61 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | PTEN | RIG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1% | 3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 4.4% | 6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 8.5% | 9.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 10.1% | -3.8% |
| Year to date | 90.3% | 40.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 106.9% | 80.2% |
Technicals
PTEN has the stronger structure| Metric | PTEN | RIG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 61.2 | 70.1 |
| ADX (14) | 15.7 | 18.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1% | 6.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 12.4% | 0.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 37.1% | 35.9% |
Risk
Split| Metric | PTEN | RIG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.33 | 0.43 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.64 | 1.32 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.56 | 2.16 |
| Max drawdown | -33.4% | -35.8% |
| Current drawdown | -11.6% | -23.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 51.6% | 51% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.4% | -4.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PTEN or RIG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, RIG is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 54 against PTEN's 49. The edge comes from quality and momentum. PTEN is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PTEN or RIG the better buy right now?
RIG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor RIG over PTEN?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PTEN leads Value by 24 points; RIG leads Quality by 21 points; RIG leads Momentum by 21 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PTEN or RIG?
Analyst price targets imply +11.3% upside for PTEN and +15.9% for RIG, so the Street currently favors RIG. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PTEN or RIG?
PTEN is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PTEN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PTEN or RIG?
RIG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PTEN or RIG?
RIG on the Momentum factor, by 21 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PTEN or RIG?
RIG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. RIG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PTEN more profitable than RIG?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 14.2% vs 74.3%; operating margin -1.1% vs 22.2%; ttm roe -2.8% vs -20.2%. PTEN leads on one measure and RIG on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is RIG's lead over PTEN getting stronger or weaker?
RIG lead: Reversed — PTEN led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; RIG now leads by 5. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-20, when RIG moved ahead of PTEN.
What would change the PTEN vs RIG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PTEN closes the Quality gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to RIG's edge; PTEN's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; RIG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about PTEN and RIG?
PTEN: 3 bullish / 0 bearish / 3 neutral. RIG: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PTEN is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On RIG it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare PTEN and RIG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.