PVH vs ROST Stock Comparison
PVH currently leads ROST in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 63 vs 58. The clearest difference is value, while ROST has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between PVH and ROST?
PVH leads the current stock comparison as PVH Corp., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
PVH Corp. vs Ross Stores, Inc.
PVH leads
PVH leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 1 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support PVH, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
PVH Corp.
Ross Stores, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PVH over ROST, 63 versus 58 as of Oct 21, 2026. PVH's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while ROST holds the stronger quality profile. PVH also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PVH today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. PVH lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare PVH Corp. and Ross Stores, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare PVH and ROST against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value73 vs 28PVH +45
- Quality46 vs 73ROST +27
- Risk Resilience47 vs 68ROST +21
- Momentum81 vs 71PVH +10
4 of 6 evidence groups favor PVH. PVH’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; ROST keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
PVH's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PVH and ROST both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PVH (PVH Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
ROST (Ross Stores, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, risk resilience, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PVHPVH on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PVHPVH on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PVHPVH on the peer-relative Value factor, by 45 points.
Momentum
PVHPVH on the Momentum factor, by 10 points.
Lower downside
ROSTROST on Risk Resilience, by 21 points.
Analyst upside
PVHPVH on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | PVH | ROST | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +15.5% | +13.1% | PVH has more room |
| Target dispersion | +53.8% | +31.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 14 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | PVH | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 31.95% | 41.56% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.038 | $0.285 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.150 | $1.620 |
| Years increased | 1 | 5 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | Yes |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | not ranked |
ROST grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 41.56% a year against PVH's 31.95%. ROST never reduced its regular dividend in the window; PVH did in 1 year.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PVH. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PVH | 63 vs 58 |
| Fundamentals | ROSTon balance | revenue growth -19.2% vs 4.2%; EPS growth 157.5% vs 31.4%; TTM ROE 3.3% vs 42.3%; gross margin 57.5% vs 29.9%; operating margin 6.9% vs 13.7% — ROST takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PVH | Value 73 vs 28 |
| Technicals | PVH | Price vs 50-day 8.6% vs 0.7%; vs 200-day 12.5% vs 7.5% |
| Risk Resilience | ROST | Risk Resilience 47 vs 68 |
| Analyst expectations | PVH | Target upside 15.5% vs 13.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PVH and ROST and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PVH.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20PVH lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PVH +5
- 63 vs 58
- 7 sessions ago
- PVH +7
- 63 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- PVH +1
- 58 vs 57
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 48 vs 48
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Sep 28 when PVH moved ahead of ROST.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only PVH
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
4 bullish / 0 bearish
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, Uptrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
PVH leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.36%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.29%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ROST closes the Value gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to PVH's edge.
- 2ROST's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3PVH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ROST leads on balance| Metric | PVH | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -19.2% | 4.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 157.5% | 31.4% |
| Gross margin | 57.5% | 29.9% |
| Operating margin | 6.9% | 13.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 3.3% | 42.3% |
| Debt to equity | 0.86 | 0.7 |
Performance
ROST leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | PVH | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 4.5% | 5.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 14% | 2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 8% | -0.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -12.5% | 5.2% |
| Year to date | 29.1% | 31.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 5.8% | 52.9% |
Technicals
PVH has the stronger structure| Metric | PVH | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 84.3 | 55.8 |
| ADX (14) | 26.1 | 18.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | 8.6% | 0.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 12.5% | 7.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 29.5% | 17.8% |
Risk
ROST is the more resilient| Metric | PVH | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.14 | 0.55 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.28 | 1.59 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.34 | 2.54 |
| Max drawdown | -30.7% | -13% |
| Current drawdown | -12.5% | -7% |
| Annualized volatility | 46.8% | 26.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4% | -2.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PVH or ROST?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PVH is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 63 against ROST's 58. The edge comes from value and momentum. ROST is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PVH or ROST the better buy right now?
PVH carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PVH over ROST?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PVH leads Value by 45 points; ROST leads Quality by 27 points; ROST leads Risk Resilience by 21 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PVH or ROST?
Analyst price targets imply +15.5% upside for PVH and +13.1% for ROST, so the Street currently favors PVH. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PVH or ROST?
PVH is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PVH on the peer-relative Value factor, by 45 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PVH or ROST?
PVH on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PVH or ROST?
PVH on the Momentum factor, by 10 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PVH or ROST?
ROST is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ROST on Risk Resilience, by 21 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PVH more profitable than ROST?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 57.5% vs 29.9%; operating margin 6.9% vs 13.7%; ttm roe 3.3% vs 42.3%. PVH leads on one measure and ROST on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is PVH's lead over ROST getting stronger or weaker?
PVH lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-28, when PVH moved ahead of ROST.
What would change the PVH vs ROST verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ROST closes the Value gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to PVH's edge; ROST's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; PVH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about PVH and ROST?
PVH: 5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. ROST: 4 bullish / 0 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PVH is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On ROST it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare PVH and ROST with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.