REXR vs SBAC Stock Comparison
Compare REXR and SBAC across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between REXR and SBAC?
SBAC leads the current stock comparison as SBA Communications Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. vs SBA Communications Corporation
SBAC leads
SBAC leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support SBAC.
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
SBA Communications Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SBAC over REXR, 52 versus 50 as of Sep 11, 2026. SBAC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while REXR holds the stronger momentum profile. SBAC also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SBAC today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. SBAC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. and SBA Communications Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare REXR and SBAC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum61 vs 42REXR +19
- Value38 vs 53SBAC +15
- Quality51 vs 59SBAC +8
- Risk Resilience56 vs 50REXR +6
3 of 6 evidence groups favor SBAC. SBAC’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; REXR keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -20
New signals
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
SBAC's lead narrowed by 6 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — REXR and SBAC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SBAC (SBA Communications Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
REXR (Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, risk resilience, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SBACSBAC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SBACSBAC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SBACSBAC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points.
Momentum
REXRREXR on the Momentum factor, by 19 points.
Lower downside
REXRREXR on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
SBACSBAC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | REXR | SBAC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +0.5% | +21% | SBAC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +20.9% | +17.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SBAC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 50 vs 52 |
| Fundamentals | SBACon balance | revenue growth 0.2% vs 1.7%; EPS growth -6.9% vs 6.9%; TTM ROE -4.8% vs -20.7%; gross margin 61% vs 63.9%; operating margin 39.6% vs 50.8% — SBAC takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SBAC | Value 38 vs 53 |
| Technicals | REXR | Price vs 50-day 3.9% vs 1.1%; vs 200-day 0.2% vs -5.9% |
| Risk Resilience | REXR | Risk Resilience 56 vs 50 |
| Analyst expectations | SBAC | Target upside 0.5% vs 21% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of REXR and SBAC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SBAC.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SBAC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SBAC +2
- 50 vs 52
- 7 sessions ago
- SBAC +7
- 51 vs 58
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 50 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 46 vs 46
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Aug 25 when SBAC moved ahead of REXR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.84%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (5.06%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.81%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 5 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.23%, AIQ -5 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1REXR closes the Value gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to SBAC's edge.
- 2REXR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SBAC starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SBAC leads on balance| Metric | REXR | SBAC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.2% | 1.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -6.9% | 6.9% |
| Gross margin | 61% | 63.9% |
| Operating margin | 39.6% | 50.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -4.8% | -20.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.45 | -3.28 |
Performance
REXR leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | REXR | SBAC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1% | -2.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 1.7% | -0.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 7% | -12.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 4.9% | -3.8% |
| Year to date | -4.4% | -6.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -13.7% | -5.2% |
Technicals
REXR has the stronger structure| Metric | REXR | SBAC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 49.3 | 51.3 |
| ADX (14) | 16.3 | 12.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3.9% | 1.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.2% | -5.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 18.3% | 22.6% |
Risk
REXR is the more resilient| Metric | REXR | SBAC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.56 | 0.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.6 | -0.11 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.02 | -0.21 |
| Max drawdown | -26.6% | -22.9% |
| Current drawdown | -16.4% | -18.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 25.2% | 34.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2% | -2.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, REXR or SBAC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SBAC is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 52 against REXR's 50. The edge comes from value and quality. REXR is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is REXR or SBAC the better buy right now?
SBAC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SBAC over REXR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. REXR leads Momentum by 19 points; SBAC leads Value by 15 points; SBAC leads Quality by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, REXR or SBAC?
Analyst price targets imply +0.5% upside for REXR and +21% for SBAC, so the Street currently favors SBAC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, REXR or SBAC?
SBAC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SBAC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, REXR or SBAC?
SBAC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, REXR or SBAC?
REXR on the Momentum factor, by 19 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, REXR or SBAC?
REXR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. REXR on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is REXR more profitable than SBAC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 61% vs 63.9%; operating margin 39.6% vs 50.8%; ttm roe -4.8% vs -20.7%. REXR leads on one measure and SBAC on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SBAC's lead over REXR getting stronger or weaker?
SBAC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 7 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-25, when SBAC moved ahead of REXR.
What would change the REXR vs SBAC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: REXR closes the Value gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to SBAC's edge; REXR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SBAC starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about REXR and SBAC?
REXR: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral. SBAC: 0 bullish / 3 bearish. The most decision-relevant rule on REXR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SBAC it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare REXR and SBAC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.