REXR vs TRNO Stock Comparison
Compare REXR and TRNO across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between REXR and TRNO?
TRNO leads the current stock comparison as Terreno Realty Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. vs Terreno Realty Corporation
TRNO leads
TRNO leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, having only recently taken the lead back from REXR.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support TRNO, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
Terreno Realty Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TRNO over REXR, 51 versus 50 as of Sep 11, 2026. TRNO's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while REXR holds the stronger momentum profile. TRNO also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TRNO today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. TRNO lead: Reversed — REXR led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; TRNO now leads by 1.
Compare Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. and Terreno Realty Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare REXR and TRNO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum61 vs 31REXR +30
- Risk Resilience56 vs 72TRNO +16
- Quality51 vs 65TRNO +14
- Value38 vs 42TRNO +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor TRNO. TRNO’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; REXR keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
TRNO's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — REXR and TRNO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TRNO (Terreno Realty Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
REXR (Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 18.3% against 10.3%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TRNOTRNO on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
REXRREXR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TRNOTRNO on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
REXRREXR on the Momentum factor, by 30 points.
Lower downside
TRNOTRNO on Risk Resilience, by 16 points.
Analyst upside
TRNOTRNO on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | REXR | TRNO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +0.5% | +12.7% | TRNO has more room |
| Target dispersion | +20.9% | +42.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TRNO. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 50 vs 51 |
| Fundamentals | TRNOon balance | revenue growth 0.2% vs 0.2%; EPS growth -6.9% vs -18.2%; TTM ROE -4.8% vs 9.2%; gross margin 61% vs 64.4%; operating margin 39.6% vs 41.4% — TRNO takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TRNO | Value 38 vs 42 |
| Technicals | REXR | Price vs 50-day 3.9% vs -5.8%; vs 200-day 0.2% vs 0.4% |
| Risk Resilience | TRNO | Risk Resilience 56 vs 72 |
| Analyst expectations | TRNO | Target upside 0.5% vs 12.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of REXR and TRNO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TRNO.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10TRNO lead: Reversed — REXR led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; TRNO now leads by 1.
- Today
- TRNO +1
- 50 vs 51
- 7 sessions ago
- Level
- 51 vs 51
- 30 sessions ago
- REXR +3
- 50 vs 47
- 90 sessions ago
- TRNO +10
- 46 vs 56
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Sep 9 when TRNO moved ahead of REXR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.84%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (6.60%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
TRNO leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.81%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.38%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1REXR closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to TRNO's edge.
- 2REXR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3TRNO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TRNO leads on balance| Metric | REXR | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -6.9% | -18.2% |
| Gross margin | 61% | 64.4% |
| Operating margin | 39.6% | 41.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -4.8% | 9.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.45 | 0.24 |
Performance
REXR leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | REXR | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1% | -1.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 1.7% | -5.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 7% | -1.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 4.9% | 3.7% |
| Year to date | -4.4% | 10.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -13.7% | 10.7% |
Technicals
REXR has the stronger structure| Metric | REXR | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 49.3 | 23 |
| ADX (14) | 16.3 | 20.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3.9% | -5.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 18.3% | 10.3% |
Risk
TRNO is the more resilient| Metric | REXR | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.56 | 0.42 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.6 | 0.5 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.02 | 0.8 |
| Max drawdown | -26.6% | -13.4% |
| Current drawdown | -16.4% | -13.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 25.2% | 20.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2% | -1.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, REXR or TRNO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TRNO is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 51 against REXR's 50. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. REXR is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is REXR or TRNO the better buy right now?
TRNO carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TRNO over REXR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. REXR leads Momentum by 30 points; TRNO leads Risk Resilience by 16 points; TRNO leads Quality by 14 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, REXR or TRNO?
Analyst price targets imply +0.5% upside for REXR and +12.7% for TRNO, so the Street currently favors TRNO. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, REXR or TRNO?
TRNO is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TRNO on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, REXR or TRNO?
REXR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, REXR or TRNO?
REXR on the Momentum factor, by 30 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, REXR or TRNO?
TRNO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TRNO on Risk Resilience, by 16 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is REXR more profitable than TRNO?
TRNO leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 61% vs 64.4%; operating margin 39.6% vs 41.4%; ttm roe -4.8% vs 9.2%.
Is TRNO's lead over REXR getting stronger or weaker?
TRNO lead: Reversed — REXR led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; TRNO now leads by 1. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-09, when TRNO moved ahead of REXR.
What would change the REXR vs TRNO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: REXR closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to TRNO's edge; REXR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; TRNO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about REXR and TRNO?
REXR: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral. TRNO: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on REXR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On TRNO it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare REXR and TRNO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.