RIOT vs RZLV Stock Comparison
RZLV currently leads RIOT in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 35 vs 30. The clearest difference is quality, while RIOT has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between RIOT and RZLV?
RZLV leads the current stock comparison as Rezolve AI PLC, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Riot Platforms, Inc. vs Rezolve AI PLC
RZLV leads
RZLV leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Quality.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support RZLV.
Riot Platforms, Inc.
Rezolve AI PLC
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors RZLV over RIOT, 35 versus 30 as of Oct 31, 2026. RZLV's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while RIOT holds the stronger risk resilience profile. RZLV also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RZLV today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. RZLV lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Riot Platforms, Inc. and Rezolve AI PLC across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare RIOT and RZLV against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality28 vs 50RZLV +22
- Risk Resilience31 vs 20RIOT +11
- Momentum29 vs 27Even
- Value34 vs 34Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor RZLV. RZLV’s edge is concentrated in quality; RIOT keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
RZLV's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — RIOT and RZLV both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
RZLV (Rezolve AI PLC): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
RIOT (Riot Platforms, Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
RZLVRZLV on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
RIOTRIOT on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
RIOTRIOT on Risk Resilience, by 11 points.
Analyst upside
RZLVRZLV on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | RIOT | RZLV | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +149.8% | +345.2% | RZLV has more room |
| Target dispersion | +50% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RZLV. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | RZLV | 30 vs 35 |
| Fundamentals | RIOTon balance | revenue growth 4.2% vs 5.4%; EPS growth 52.8% vs 45.8%; TTM ROE -48.4% vs -87.2%; gross margin -13.8% vs 66%; operating margin -89.1% vs -185.6% — RIOT takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 34 vs 34 |
| Technicals | RIOT | Price vs 50-day -32.7% vs -32.2%; vs 200-day -25.7% vs -39.5% |
| Risk Resilience | RIOT | Risk Resilience 31 vs 20 |
| Analyst expectations | RZLV | Target upside 149.8% vs 345.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of RIOT and RZLV and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on RZLV.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28RZLV lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- RZLV +5
- 30 vs 35
- 7 sessions ago
- RZLV +5
- 29 vs 34
- 30 sessions ago
- RZLV +6
- 30 vs 36
- 90 sessions ago
- RZLV +13
- 36 vs 49
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Sep 30 when RZLV moved ahead of RIOT.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
No signal that the other name lacks.
0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral
Only RZLV
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bearish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -6.77%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.35%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1RIOT closes the Quality gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to RZLV's edge.
- 2RIOT's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3RZLV starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
RIOT leads on balance| Metric | RIOT | RZLV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.2% | 5.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 52.8% | 45.8% |
| Gross margin | -13.8% | 66% |
| Operating margin | -89.1% | -185.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -48.4% | -87.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.13 | 0.64 |
Performance
RIOT leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | RIOT | RZLV |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.1% | -5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -28.3% | -29.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -34.7% | -35.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -9.6% | -37.8% |
| Year to date | 14% | -40.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -32.5% | -67.6% |
Technicals
RIOT has the stronger structure| Metric | RIOT | RZLV |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36 | 32.4 |
| ADX (14) | 37.4 | 35.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -32.7% | -32.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -25.7% | -39.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 79.5% | 82.9% |
Risk
RIOT is the more resilient| Metric | RIOT | RZLV |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.88 | 2.93 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.07 | -0.61 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.13 | -1.08 |
| Max drawdown | -56.3% | -68.3% |
| Current drawdown | -49.6% | -67% |
| Annualized volatility | 87.5% | 100.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -8.8% | -8.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, RIOT or RZLV?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, RZLV is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 35 against RIOT's 30. The edge comes from quality. RIOT is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is RIOT or RZLV the better buy right now?
RZLV carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor RZLV over RIOT?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. RZLV leads Quality by 22 points; RIOT leads Risk Resilience by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, RIOT or RZLV?
Analyst price targets imply +149.8% upside for RIOT and +345.2% for RZLV, so the Street currently favors RZLV. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, RIOT or RZLV?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, RIOT or RZLV?
RIOT on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, RIOT or RZLV?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, RIOT or RZLV?
RIOT is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. RIOT on Risk Resilience, by 11 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is RIOT more profitable than RZLV?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin -13.8% vs 66%; operating margin -89.1% vs -185.6%; ttm roe -48.4% vs -87.2%. RIOT leads on two measures and RZLV on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is RZLV's lead over RIOT getting stronger or weaker?
RZLV lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-30, when RZLV moved ahead of RIOT.
What would change the RIOT vs RZLV verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: RIOT closes the Quality gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to RZLV's edge; RIOT's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; RZLV starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about RIOT and RZLV?
RIOT: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. RZLV: 0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on RIOT is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On RZLV it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare RIOT and RZLV with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.