RIOT vs SOUN Stock Comparison
Compare RIOT and SOUN across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between RIOT and SOUN?
RIOT leads the current stock comparison as Riot Platforms, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Riot Platforms, Inc. vs SoundHound AI, Inc.
RIOT leads
RIOT leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from SOUN. Wall Street currently favors SOUN on target upside.
Fragile: 1 of 6 evidence groups support RIOT, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Riot Platforms, Inc.
SoundHound AI, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors RIOT over SOUN, 39 versus 38 as of Sep 11, 2026. RIOT's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum, while SOUN holds the stronger quality profile. RIOT also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors SOUN. 1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RIOT today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. RIOT lead: Reversed — SOUN led by 14 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; RIOT now leads by 1.
Compare Riot Platforms, Inc. and SoundHound AI, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare RIOT and SOUN against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum63 vs 27RIOT +36
- Quality28 vs 47SOUN +19
- Risk Resilience31 vs 42SOUN +11
- Value34 vs 35Even
1 of 6 evidence groups favor RIOT. RIOT’s edge is concentrated in momentum; SOUN keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -9
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
RIOT's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — RIOT and SOUN both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
RIOT (Riot Platforms, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.
SOUN (SoundHound AI, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, risk resilience, fundamentals.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
RIOTRIOT on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
RIOTRIOT on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
RIOTRIOT on the Momentum factor, by 36 points.
Lower downside
SOUNSOUN on Risk Resilience, by 11 points.
Analyst upside
SOUNSOUN on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors RIOT, analyst targets favor SOUN. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | RIOT | SOUN | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +46.7% | +81% | SOUN has more room |
| Target dispersion | +50.8% | +17.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RIOT. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 39 vs 38 |
| Fundamentals | SOUNon balance | revenue growth 4.2% vs 40.1%; EPS growth 52.8% vs -66.7%; TTM ROE -48.4% vs -30.2%; gross margin -13.8% vs 37.4%; operating margin -89.1% vs -89.7% — SOUN takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 34 vs 35 |
| Technicals | RIOT | Price vs 50-day 3.7% vs -7.2%; vs 200-day 11.5% vs -24% |
| Risk Resilience | SOUN | Risk Resilience 31 vs 42 |
| Analyst expectations | SOUN | Target upside 46.7% vs 81% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of RIOT and SOUN and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on RIOT.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10RIOT lead: Reversed — SOUN led by 14 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; RIOT now leads by 1.
- Today
- RIOT +1
- 39 vs 38
- 7 sessions ago
- Level
- 40 vs 40
- 30 sessions ago
- SOUN +14
- 33 vs 47
- 90 sessions ago
- SOUN +7
- 31 vs 38
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Jul 1 when SOUN moved ahead of RIOT.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (10.22%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (22.50%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
SOUN is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.48%, AIQ -2 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.32%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SOUN closes the Momentum gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to RIOT's edge.
- 2SOUN's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3RIOT's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SOUN leads on balance| Metric | RIOT | SOUN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.2% | 40.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 52.8% | -66.7% |
| Gross margin | -13.8% | 37.4% |
| Operating margin | -89.1% | -89.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -48.4% | -30.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.13 | 0.01 |
Performance
RIOT leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | RIOT | SOUN |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 12.4% | -7.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 3.1% | -15.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -13% | -7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 41.5% | -19.4% |
| Year to date | 65.4% | -37% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 55.9% | -58.3% |
Technicals
RIOT has the stronger structure| Metric | RIOT | SOUN |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 49.9 | 32.8 |
| ADX (14) | 13.5 | 18.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3.7% | -7.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 11.5% | -24% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 90.4% | 44.3% |
Risk
SOUN is the more resilient| Metric | RIOT | SOUN |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.75 | 3.05 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.75 | -0.9 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.3 | -1.64 |
| Max drawdown | -46.9% | -73.4% |
| Current drawdown | -27% | -70.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 88.5% | 72% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -8.6% | -7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, RIOT or SOUN?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, RIOT is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 39 against SOUN's 38. The edge comes from momentum. SOUN is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is RIOT or SOUN the better buy right now?
RIOT carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor RIOT over SOUN?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. RIOT leads Momentum by 36 points; SOUN leads Quality by 19 points; SOUN leads Risk Resilience by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, RIOT or SOUN?
Analyst price targets imply +46.7% upside for RIOT and +81% for SOUN, so the Street currently favors SOUN. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors RIOT. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, RIOT or SOUN?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, RIOT or SOUN?
RIOT on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, RIOT or SOUN?
RIOT on the Momentum factor, by 36 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, RIOT or SOUN?
SOUN is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SOUN on Risk Resilience, by 11 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is RIOT more profitable than SOUN?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin -13.8% vs 37.4%; operating margin -89.1% vs -89.7%; ttm roe -48.4% vs -30.2%. RIOT leads on one measure and SOUN on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is RIOT's lead over SOUN getting stronger or weaker?
RIOT lead: Reversed — SOUN led by 14 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; RIOT now leads by 1. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-01, when SOUN moved ahead of RIOT.
What would change the RIOT vs SOUN verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SOUN closes the Momentum gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to RIOT's edge; SOUN's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; RIOT's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about RIOT and SOUN?
RIOT: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. SOUN: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on RIOT is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SOUN it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare RIOT and SOUN with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.