RL vs SKX Stock Comparison
RL currently leads SKX in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 65 vs 57. The clearest difference is quality, while SKX has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between RL and SKX?
RL leads the current stock comparison as Ralph Lauren Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Ralph Lauren Corporation vs Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
RL leads
RL leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Quality, and the lead has widened from 4 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 3 of 5 evidence groups support RL, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors RL over SKX, 65 versus 57 as of Oct 21, 2026. RL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while SKX holds the stronger risk resilience profile. 3 of 5 covered evidence groups favor RL today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. RL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Ralph Lauren Corporation and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare RL and SKX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality79 vs 55RL +24
- Risk Resilience59 vs 80SKX +21
- Value38 vs 48SKX +10
3 of 5 evidence groups favor RL. RL’s edge is concentrated in quality; SKX keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
RL's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — RL and SKX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
RL (Ralph Lauren Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
SKX (Skechers U.S.A., Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
RLRL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
RLRL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SKXSKX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
SKXSKX on Risk Resilience, by 21 points.
Analyst upside
RLRL on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | RL | SKX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +17.4% | -0.2% | RL has more room |
| Target dispersion | +23.7% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 5 covered evidence groups favor RL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | RL | 65 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | RLon balance | revenue growth -1% vs 1.2%; EPS growth 75.1% vs -15.6%; TTM ROE 35.6% vs 8%; gross margin 70.3% vs 52.7%; operating margin 14.9% vs 9% — RL takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SKX | Value 38 vs 48 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | SKX | Risk Resilience 59 vs 80 |
| Analyst expectations | RL | Target upside 17.4% vs -0.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of RL and SKX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on RL.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20RL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- RL +8
- 65 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- RL +10
- 67 vs 57
- 30 sessions ago
- RL +4
- 61 vs 57
- 90 sessions ago
- SKX +10
- 55 vs 65
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only RL
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (1.47%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
RL leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.59%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SKX closes the Quality gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to RL's edge.
- 2SKX generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3RL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
RL leads on balance| Metric | RL | SKX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -1% | 1.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 75.1% | -15.6% |
| Gross margin | 70.3% | 52.7% |
| Operating margin | 14.9% | 9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 35.6% | 8% |
| Debt to equity | 1.1 | 0.47 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | RL | SKX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.2% | — |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 9.4% | — |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -2.3% | — |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -2.2% | — |
| Year to date | 7% | — |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 17.1% | — |
Technicals
Split| Metric | RL | SKX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 68.3 | — |
| ADX (14) | 30.2 | — |
| Price vs 50-day | 5.5% | — |
| Price vs 200-day | 3.4% | — |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 27.8% | — |
Risk
SKX is the more resilient| Metric | RL | SKX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.2 | — |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.47 | — |
| Sortino ratio | 0.89 | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.6% | — |
| Current drawdown | -8.7% | — |
| Annualized volatility | 34.9% | — |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.3% | — |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, RL or SKX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, RL is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 65 against SKX's 57. The edge comes from quality. SKX is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is RL or SKX the better buy right now?
RL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor RL over SKX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. RL leads Quality by 24 points; SKX leads Risk Resilience by 21 points; SKX leads Value by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, RL or SKX?
Analyst price targets imply +17.4% upside for RL and -0.2% for SKX, so the Street currently favors RL. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, RL or SKX?
SKX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SKX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, RL or SKX?
RL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, RL or SKX?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, RL or SKX?
SKX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SKX on Risk Resilience, by 21 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is RL more profitable than SKX?
RL leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 70.3% vs 52.7%; operating margin 14.9% vs 9%; ttm roe 35.6% vs 8%.
Is RL's lead over SKX getting stronger or weaker?
RL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the RL vs SKX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SKX closes the Quality gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to RL's edge; SKX generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; RL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about RL and SKX?
RL: 2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. SKX: No active signals. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on RL is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare RL and SKX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.