RMD vs SOLV Stock Comparison
Compare RMD and SOLV across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between RMD and SOLV?
SOLV leads the current stock comparison as Solventum Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
ResMed Inc. vs Solventum Corporation
SOLV leads
SOLV leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from RMD. Wall Street currently favors RMD on target upside.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support SOLV, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
ResMed Inc.
Solventum Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SOLV over RMD, 63 versus 56 as of Sep 11, 2026. SOLV's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while RMD holds the stronger risk resilience profile. SOLV also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors RMD. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SOLV today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. SOLV lead: Reversed — RMD led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SOLV now leads by 7.
Compare ResMed Inc. and Solventum Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare RMD and SOLV against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value42 vs 67SOLV +25
- Momentum35 vs 56SOLV +21
- Risk Resilience70 vs 56RMD +14
- Quality80 vs 67RMD +13
4 of 6 evidence groups favor SOLV. SOLV’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; RMD keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -15
New signals
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
SOLV's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — RMD and SOLV both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SOLV (Solventum Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
RMD (ResMed Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, quality, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 28.7% against 20.1%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SOLVSOLV on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SOLVSOLV on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SOLVSOLV on the peer-relative Value factor, by 25 points.
Momentum
SOLVSOLV on the Momentum factor, by 21 points.
Lower downside
RMDRMD on Risk Resilience, by 14 points.
Analyst upside
RMDRMD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SOLV, analyst targets favor RMD. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | RMD | SOLV | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +13.3% | +3.7% | RMD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +35.2% | +77.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SOLV. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SOLV | 56 vs 63 |
| Fundamentals | SOLVon balance | revenue growth 2.3% vs 10.1%; EPS growth -2.6% vs 6.6%; TTM ROE 23.9% vs 29%; gross margin 61.2% vs 54.7%; operating margin 33.5% vs 25% — SOLV takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SOLV | Value 42 vs 67 |
| Technicals | SOLV | Price vs 50-day 0.8% vs 3.3%; vs 200-day -3.7% vs 13% |
| Risk Resilience | RMD | Risk Resilience 70 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | RMD | Target upside 13.3% vs 3.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of RMD and SOLV and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SOLV.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SOLV lead: Reversed — RMD led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SOLV now leads by 7.
- Today
- SOLV +7
- 56 vs 63
- 7 sessions ago
- SOLV +6
- 62 vs 68
- 30 sessions ago
- RMD +3
- 66 vs 63
- 90 sessions ago
- RMD +5
- 68 vs 63
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Aug 24 when SOLV moved ahead of RMD.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 2 bearish
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (5.26%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (9.17%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
SOLV leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.6%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.23%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1RMD closes the Value gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to SOLV's edge.
- 2RMD's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SOLV's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SOLV leads on balance| Metric | RMD | SOLV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.3% | 10.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -2.6% | 6.6% |
| Gross margin | 61.2% | 54.7% |
| Operating margin | 33.5% | 25% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 23.9% | 29% |
| Debt to equity | 0.13 | 1.1 |
Performance
SOLV leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | RMD | SOLV |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.9% | -4.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -2.8% | 2.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 13.4% | 8.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -8.6% | 29.6% |
| Year to date | -8.8% | 10.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -21.4% | 17.5% |
Technicals
SOLV has the stronger structure| Metric | RMD | SOLV |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 37.1 | 45.3 |
| ADX (14) | 19 | 24.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.8% | 3.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -3.7% | 13% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 28.7% | 20.1% |
Risk
RMD is the more resilient| Metric | RMD | SOLV |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.45 | 0.62 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.84 | 0.64 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.17 | 1.03 |
| Max drawdown | -35.5% | -27.5% |
| Current drawdown | -22.5% | -5.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 28.6% | 29.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.1% | -2.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, RMD or SOLV?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SOLV is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 63 against RMD's 56. The edge comes from value and momentum. RMD is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is RMD or SOLV the better buy right now?
SOLV carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SOLV over RMD?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SOLV leads Value by 25 points; SOLV leads Momentum by 21 points; RMD leads Risk Resilience by 14 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, RMD or SOLV?
Analyst price targets imply +13.3% upside for RMD and +3.7% for SOLV, so the Street currently favors RMD. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SOLV. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, RMD or SOLV?
SOLV is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SOLV on the peer-relative Value factor, by 25 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, RMD or SOLV?
SOLV on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, RMD or SOLV?
SOLV on the Momentum factor, by 21 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, RMD or SOLV?
RMD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. RMD on Risk Resilience, by 14 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is RMD more profitable than SOLV?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 61.2% vs 54.7%; operating margin 33.5% vs 25%; ttm roe 23.9% vs 29%. RMD leads on two measures and SOLV on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SOLV's lead over RMD getting stronger or weaker?
SOLV lead: Reversed — RMD led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SOLV now leads by 7. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-24, when SOLV moved ahead of RMD.
What would change the RMD vs SOLV verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: RMD closes the Value gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to SOLV's edge; RMD's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SOLV's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about RMD and SOLV?
RMD: 0 bullish / 2 bearish. SOLV: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on RMD is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SOLV it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare RMD and SOLV with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.