RMD vs TFX Stock Comparison
Compare RMD and TFX across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between RMD and TFX?
RMD leads the current stock comparison as ResMed Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
ResMed Inc. vs Teleflex Incorporated
RMD leads
RMD leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 10 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors TFX on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support RMD, and its lead is narrowing.
ResMed Inc.
Teleflex Incorporated
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors RMD over TFX, 56 versus 50 as of Sep 11, 2026. RMD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while TFX holds the stronger value profile. RMD also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors TFX. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RMD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. RMD lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare ResMed Inc. and Teleflex Incorporated across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare RMD and TFX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality80 vs 39RMD +41
- Value42 vs 62TFX +20
- Momentum35 vs 41TFX +6
- Risk Resilience70 vs 64RMD +6
3 of 6 evidence groups favor RMD. RMD’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; TFX keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -19
No new signals fired.
RMD's lead widened by 5 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — RMD and TFX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
RMD (ResMed Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
TFX (Teleflex Incorporated): the counter-case, on value, momentum, valuation.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
RMDRMD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TFXTFX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TFXTFX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
TFXTFX on the Momentum factor, by 6 points.
Lower downside
RMDRMD on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
TFXTFX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors RMD, analyst targets favor TFX. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | RMD | TFX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +13.3% | +16.2% | TFX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +35.2% | +27.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RMD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | RMD | 56 vs 50 |
| Fundamentals | RMDon balance | revenue growth 2.3% vs 4%; EPS growth -2.6% vs 13.7%; TTM ROE 23.9% vs -31.8%; gross margin 61.2% vs 53.8%; operating margin 33.5% vs 3.3% — RMD takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TFX | Value 42 vs 62 |
| Technicals | TFX | Price vs 50-day 0.8% vs -3.4%; vs 200-day -3.7% vs 6.8% |
| Risk Resilience | RMD | Risk Resilience 70 vs 64 |
| Analyst expectations | TFX | Target upside 13.3% vs 16.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of RMD and TFX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on RMD.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10RMD lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- RMD +6
- 56 vs 50
- 7 sessions ago
- RMD +4
- 62 vs 58
- 30 sessions ago
- RMD +10
- 66 vs 56
- 90 sessions ago
- RMD +11
- 68 vs 57
The lead changed hands 8 times in this window, most recently on Jul 27 when RMD moved ahead of TFX.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 2 bearish
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (5.26%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (9.73%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
TFX is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.6%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.77%, AIQ -5 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TFX closes the Quality gap — currently 41 points behind, the largest single contributor to RMD's edge.
- 2TFX's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3RMD starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate RMD's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
RMD leads on balance| Metric | RMD | TFX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.3% | 4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -2.6% | 13.7% |
| Gross margin | 61.2% | 53.8% |
| Operating margin | 33.5% | 3.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 23.9% | -31.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.13 | 0.99 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | RMD | TFX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.9% | -6.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -2.8% | -3.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 13.4% | -0.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -8.6% | 18.1% |
| Year to date | -8.8% | 8.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -21.4% | 2.6% |
Technicals
TFX has the stronger structure| Metric | RMD | TFX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 37.1 | 43.9 |
| ADX (14) | 19 | 12.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.8% | -3.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -3.7% | 6.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 28.7% | 25.4% |
Risk
RMD is the more resilient| Metric | RMD | TFX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.45 | 0.76 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.84 | 0.14 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.17 | 0.19 |
| Max drawdown | -35.5% | -24.6% |
| Current drawdown | -22.5% | -7.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 28.6% | 40.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.1% | -3.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, RMD or TFX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, RMD is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 56 against TFX's 50. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. TFX is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is RMD or TFX the better buy right now?
RMD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor RMD over TFX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. RMD leads Quality by 41 points; TFX leads Value by 20 points; TFX leads Momentum by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, RMD or TFX?
Analyst price targets imply +13.3% upside for RMD and +16.2% for TFX, so the Street currently favors TFX. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors RMD. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, RMD or TFX?
TFX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TFX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, RMD or TFX?
TFX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, RMD or TFX?
TFX on the Momentum factor, by 6 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, RMD or TFX?
RMD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. RMD on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is RMD more profitable than TFX?
RMD leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 61.2% vs 53.8%; operating margin 33.5% vs 3.3%; ttm roe 23.9% vs -31.8%.
Is RMD's lead over TFX getting stronger or weaker?
RMD lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 8 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-27, when RMD moved ahead of TFX.
What would change the RMD vs TFX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TFX closes the Quality gap — currently 41 points behind, the largest single contributor to RMD's edge; TFX's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; RMD starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate RMD's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about RMD and TFX?
RMD: 0 bullish / 2 bearish. TFX: 2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on RMD is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On TFX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare RMD and TFX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.