ROST vs SKX Stock Comparison
SKX currently leads ROST in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 57 vs 54. The clearest difference is risk resilience, while ROST has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between ROST and SKX?
SKX leads the current stock comparison as Skechers U.S.A., Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Ross Stores, Inc. vs Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
SKX leads
SKX leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Value. Wall Street currently favors ROST on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 5 evidence groups support SKX.
Ross Stores, Inc.
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SKX over ROST, 57 versus 54 as of Nov 7, 2026. SKX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and value, while ROST holds the stronger quality profile. Analyst target upside, however, currently favors ROST. 2 of 5 covered evidence groups favor SKX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. SKX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Ross Stores, Inc. and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare ROST and SKX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience58 vs 80SKX +22
- Value28 vs 48SKX +20
- Quality73 vs 55ROST +18
2 of 5 evidence groups favor SKX. SKX’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and value; ROST keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-11-06, compared against the prior scored session 2026-11-05.
Largest factor move: Momentum -5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
SKX's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ROST and SKX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SKX (Skechers U.S.A., Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and value.
ROST (Ross Stores, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SKXSKX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
ROSTROST on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SKXSKX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
SKXSKX on Risk Resilience, by 22 points.
Analyst upside
ROSTROST on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SKX, analyst targets favor ROST. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | ROST | SKX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +15.3% | -0.2% | ROST has more room |
| Target dispersion | +33% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 14 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 5 covered evidence groups favor SKX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 54 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | ROSTon balance | revenue growth 4.2% vs 1.2%; EPS growth 31.4% vs -15.6%; TTM ROE 42.3% vs 8%; gross margin 29.9% vs 52.7%; operating margin 13.7% vs 9% — ROST takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SKX | Value 28 vs 48 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | SKX | Risk Resilience 58 vs 80 |
| Analyst expectations | ROST | Target upside 15.3% vs -0.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ROST and SKX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SKX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jul 8 – Nov 6SKX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SKX +3
- 54 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- SKX +5
- 52 vs 57
- 30 sessions ago
- SKX +1
- 56 vs 57
- 90 sessions ago
- SKX +7
- 50 vs 57
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Nov 5 when SKX moved ahead of ROST.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish
Only ROST
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.31%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.76%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ROST closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to SKX's edge.
- 2ROST's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3SKX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ROST leads on balance| Metric | ROST | SKX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.2% | 1.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 31.4% | -15.6% |
| Gross margin | 29.9% | 52.7% |
| Operating margin | 13.7% | 9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 42.3% | 8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.7 | 0.47 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | ROST | SKX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.2% | — |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 3.9% | — |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -9% | — |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 2.3% | — |
| Year to date | 28.3% | — |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 43.1% | — |
Technicals
Split| Metric | ROST | SKX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 44.2 | — |
| ADX (14) | 14.9 | — |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.1% | — |
| Price vs 200-day | 3.4% | — |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 36.1% | — |
Risk
SKX is the more resilient| Metric | ROST | SKX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.63 | — |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.33 | — |
| Sortino ratio | 2.14 | — |
| Max drawdown | -13% | — |
| Current drawdown | -9.5% | — |
| Annualized volatility | 27.5% | — |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.4% | — |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ROST or SKX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SKX is the stronger of the two as of Nov 7, 2026, scoring 57 against ROST's 54. The edge comes from risk resilience and value. ROST is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ROST or SKX the better buy right now?
SKX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Nov 7, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SKX over ROST?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SKX leads Risk Resilience by 22 points; SKX leads Value by 20 points; ROST leads Quality by 18 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ROST or SKX?
Analyst price targets imply +15.3% upside for ROST and -0.2% for SKX, so the Street currently favors ROST. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SKX. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ROST or SKX?
SKX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SKX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ROST or SKX?
ROST on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ROST or SKX?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ROST or SKX?
SKX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SKX on Risk Resilience, by 22 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ROST more profitable than SKX?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 29.9% vs 52.7%; operating margin 13.7% vs 9%; ttm roe 42.3% vs 8%. ROST leads on two measures and SKX on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SKX's lead over ROST getting stronger or weaker?
SKX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-07-08 and 2026-11-06. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-11-05, when SKX moved ahead of ROST.
What would change the ROST vs SKX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ROST closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to SKX's edge; ROST's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; SKX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ROST and SKX?
ROST: 4 bullish / 0 bearish. SKX: No active signals. The most decision-relevant rule on ROST is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ROST and SKX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.