RTX vs TDG Stock Comparison
Compare RTX and TDG across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between RTX and TDG?
TDG leads the current stock comparison as TransDigm Group Incorporated, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
RTX Corporation vs TransDigm Group Incorporated
TDG leads
TDG leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, having only recently taken the lead back from RTX.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support TDG, and the lead recently changed hands.
RTX Corporation
TransDigm Group Incorporated
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TDG over RTX, 42 versus 41 as of Sep 11, 2026. TDG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while RTX holds the stronger momentum profile. TDG also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TDG today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. TDG lead: Reversed — RTX led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; TDG now leads by 1.
Compare RTX Corporation and TransDigm Group Incorporated across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare RTX and TDG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience53 vs 76TDG +23
- Momentum25 vs 9RTX +16
- Quality42 vs 57TDG +15
- Value47 vs 39RTX +8
2 of 6 evidence groups favor TDG. TDG’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; RTX keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No new signals fired.
TDG's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — RTX and TDG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TDG (TransDigm Group Incorporated): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
RTX (RTX Corporation): the counter-case, on momentum, value, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TDGTDG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
RTXRTX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
RTXRTX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points.
Momentum
RTXRTX on the Momentum factor, by 16 points.
Lower downside
TDGTDG on Risk Resilience, by 23 points.
Analyst upside
TDGTDG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | RTX | TDG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +19.8% | +33.1% | TDG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +14.8% | +23.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TDG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 41 vs 42 |
| Fundamentals | RTXon balance | revenue growth 11.9% vs 7.7%; EPS growth 3.3% vs 2.1%; TTM ROE 11.8% vs -21%; gross margin 20.3% vs 59.6%; operating margin 11.2% vs 46.2% — RTX takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | RTX | Value 47 vs 39 |
| Technicals | RTX | Price vs 50-day -5.1% vs -7.3%; vs 200-day 2.4% vs -11% |
| Risk Resilience | TDG | Risk Resilience 53 vs 76 |
| Analyst expectations | TDG | Target upside 19.8% vs 33.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of RTX and TDG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TDG.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10TDG lead: Reversed — RTX led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; TDG now leads by 1.
- Today
- TDG +1
- 41 vs 42
- 7 sessions ago
- TDG +3
- 40 vs 43
- 30 sessions ago
- RTX +4
- 51 vs 47
- 90 sessions ago
- TDG +3
- 55 vs 58
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Sep 1 when TDG moved ahead of RTX.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.65%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 5 bearish
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.92%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
RTX is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.22%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.19%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1RTX closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to TDG's edge.
- 2RTX's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3TDG starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
RTX leads on balance| Metric | RTX | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 11.9% | 7.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 3.3% | 2.1% |
| Gross margin | 20.3% | 59.6% |
| Operating margin | 11.2% | 46.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11.8% | -21% |
| Debt to equity | 0.59 | -2.74 |
Performance
RTX leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | RTX | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.3% | -2.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -11.1% | -8.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 11.7% | -7.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -4.4% | -10.4% |
| Year to date | 8% | -14.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 28.5% | -12.9% |
Technicals
RTX has the stronger structure| Metric | RTX | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 20.1 | 31.1 |
| ADX (14) | 28 | 19.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.1% | -7.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 2.4% | -11% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 20.6% | 19.6% |
Risk
TDG is the more resilient| Metric | RTX | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.38 | 0.69 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1 | -0.57 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.66 | -0.77 |
| Max drawdown | -19.3% | -22.4% |
| Current drawdown | -12.1% | -22.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 26.2% | 27.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.6% | -2.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, RTX or TDG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TDG is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 42 against RTX's 41. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. RTX is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is RTX or TDG the better buy right now?
TDG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TDG over RTX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TDG leads Risk Resilience by 23 points; RTX leads Momentum by 16 points; TDG leads Quality by 15 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, RTX or TDG?
Analyst price targets imply +19.8% upside for RTX and +33.1% for TDG, so the Street currently favors TDG. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, RTX or TDG?
RTX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. RTX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, RTX or TDG?
RTX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, RTX or TDG?
RTX on the Momentum factor, by 16 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, RTX or TDG?
TDG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TDG on Risk Resilience, by 23 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is RTX more profitable than TDG?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 20.3% vs 59.6%; operating margin 11.2% vs 46.2%; ttm roe 11.8% vs -21%. RTX leads on one measure and TDG on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is TDG's lead over RTX getting stronger or weaker?
TDG lead: Reversed — RTX led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; TDG now leads by 1. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-01, when TDG moved ahead of RTX.
What would change the RTX vs TDG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: RTX closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to TDG's edge; RTX's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; TDG starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about RTX and TDG?
RTX: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. TDG: 0 bullish / 5 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on RTX is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TDG it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare RTX and TDG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.