SAIC vs TDY Stock Comparison
TDY currently leads SAIC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 69 vs 68. The clearest difference is risk resilience, while SAIC has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between SAIC and TDY?
TDY leads the current stock comparison as Teledyne Technologies Incorporated, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Science Applications International Corporation vs Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
TDY leads
TDY leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Momentum, but the lead has narrowed from 4 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support TDY, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Science Applications International Corporation
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TDY over SAIC, 69 versus 68 as of Oct 31, 2026. TDY's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and momentum, while SAIC holds the stronger value profile. TDY also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TDY today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. TDY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Science Applications International Corporation and Teledyne Technologies Incorporated across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SAIC and TDY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience49 vs 76TDY +27
- Value73 vs 58SAIC +15
- Momentum84 vs 95TDY +11
- Quality59 vs 54SAIC +5
2 of 6 evidence groups favor TDY. TDY’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and momentum; SAIC keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
TDY's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SAIC and TDY both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TDY (Teledyne Technologies Incorporated): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and momentum.
SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation): the counter-case, on value, quality, fundamentals — but at materially higher volatility, 34.8% against 21.2%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TDYTDY on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SAICSAIC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SAICSAIC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points.
Momentum
TDYTDY on the Momentum factor, by 11 points.
Lower downside
TDYTDY on Risk Resilience, by 27 points.
Analyst upside
TDYTDY on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SAIC | TDY | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -22.2% | +9.8% | TDY has more room |
| Target dispersion | +49.9% | +50.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TDY. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 68 vs 69 |
| Fundamentals | SAICon balance | revenue growth 8.9% vs 1.3%; EPS growth 39.2% vs 8.4%; TTM ROE 25.9% vs 9.5%; gross margin 12.6% vs 38.5%; operating margin 7.8% vs 20% — SAIC takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SAIC | Value 73 vs 58 |
| Technicals | SAIC | Price vs 50-day 15.5% vs 6.7%; vs 200-day 34.9% vs 5.2% |
| Risk Resilience | TDY | Risk Resilience 49 vs 76 |
| Analyst expectations | TDY | Target upside -22.2% vs 9.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SAIC and TDY and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TDY.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28TDY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TDY +1
- 68 vs 69
- 7 sessions ago
- SAIC +6
- 68 vs 62
- 30 sessions ago
- TDY +4
- 54 vs 58
- 90 sessions ago
- SAIC +8
- 56 vs 48
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Oct 21 when SAIC moved ahead of TDY.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
6 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only SAIC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (19.13%)
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.6%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
3 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted
Only TDY
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.51%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Keltner Channel Breakout, RSI Overbought, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, MACD Bullish Crossover.
TDY leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.67%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.84%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SAIC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to TDY's edge.
- 2SAIC's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3TDY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate TDY's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SAIC leads on balance| Metric | SAIC | TDY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 8.9% | 1.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 39.2% | 8.4% |
| Gross margin | 12.6% | 38.5% |
| Operating margin | 7.8% | 20% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 25.9% | 9.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.18 | 0.18 |
Performance
SAIC leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | SAIC | TDY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 8.9% | 5.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 16.8% | 9.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 28.7% | 2.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 56.6% | 5.6% |
| Year to date | 44.6% | 30.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 54.3% | 25.1% |
Technicals
SAIC has the stronger structure| Metric | SAIC | TDY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 84.8 | 81.5 |
| ADX (14) | 31.9 | 20.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 15.5% | 6.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 34.9% | 5.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 34.8% | 21.2% |
Risk
TDY is the more resilient| Metric | SAIC | TDY |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.15 | 1.12 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.31 | 0.9 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.84 | 1.67 |
| Max drawdown | -28.1% | -15.2% |
| Current drawdown | -0.4% | -3.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 39.5% | 25.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3% | -2.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SAIC or TDY?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TDY is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 69 against SAIC's 68. The edge comes from risk resilience and momentum. SAIC is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SAIC or TDY the better buy right now?
TDY carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TDY over SAIC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TDY leads Risk Resilience by 27 points; SAIC leads Value by 15 points; TDY leads Momentum by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SAIC or TDY?
Analyst price targets imply -22.2% upside for SAIC and +9.8% for TDY, so the Street currently favors TDY. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SAIC or TDY?
SAIC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SAIC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SAIC or TDY?
SAIC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SAIC or TDY?
TDY on the Momentum factor, by 11 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SAIC or TDY?
TDY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TDY on Risk Resilience, by 27 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SAIC more profitable than TDY?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 12.6% vs 38.5%; operating margin 7.8% vs 20%; ttm roe 25.9% vs 9.5%. SAIC leads on one measure and TDY on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is TDY's lead over SAIC getting stronger or weaker?
TDY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-21, when SAIC moved ahead of TDY.
What would change the SAIC vs TDY verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SAIC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to TDY's edge; SAIC's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; TDY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate TDY's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about SAIC and TDY?
SAIC: 6 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. TDY: 3 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SAIC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TDY it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare SAIC and TDY with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.