SCCO vs STLD Stock Comparison
STLD currently leads SCCO in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 62 vs 61. The clearest difference is value, while SCCO has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between SCCO and STLD?
STLD leads the current stock comparison as Steel Dynamics, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Southern Copper Corporation vs Steel Dynamics, Inc.
STLD leads
STLD leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from SCCO.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support STLD, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Southern Copper Corporation
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors STLD over SCCO, 62 versus 61 as of Oct 21, 2026. STLD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while SCCO holds the stronger quality profile. STLD also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor STLD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. STLD lead: Reversed — SCCO led by 11 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; STLD now leads by 1.
Compare Southern Copper Corporation and Steel Dynamics, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SCCO and STLD against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality88 vs 48SCCO +40
- Value32 vs 58STLD +26
- Momentum60 vs 83STLD +23
- Risk Resilience64 vs 61Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor STLD. STLD’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; SCCO keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
STLD's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SCCO and STLD both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
STLD (Steel Dynamics, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
SCCO (Southern Copper Corporation): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
STLDSTLD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
STLDSTLD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
STLDSTLD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 26 points.
Momentum
STLDSTLD on the Momentum factor, by 23 points.
Lower downside
STLDSTLD carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
STLDSTLD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SCCO | STLD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -19.9% | +10.9% | STLD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +28.3% | +15.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Sell | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | SCCO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 16.43% | 14.87% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $1.388 | $1.000 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.969 | $2.000 |
| Years increased | 4 | 5 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | Yes |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | #35 |
SCCO grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 16.43% a year against STLD's 14.87%. STLD never reduced its regular dividend in the window; SCCO did in 1 year. They are ranked in different cohorts — variable-dividend payers and US dividend-paying corporations — so their ranks are not comparable with each other.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor STLD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 61 vs 62 |
| Fundamentals | SCCOon balance | EPS growth 4.7% vs 32.6%; TTM ROE 49.4% vs 17.6%; gross margin 62.3% vs 14.6%; operating margin 56.9% vs 10.6% — SCCO takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | STLD | Value 32 vs 58 |
| Technicals | STLD | Price vs 50-day -1.6% vs 3.9%; vs 200-day 8.2% vs 10.7% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 64 vs 61 |
| Analyst expectations | STLD | Target upside -19.9% vs 10.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SCCO and STLD and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on STLD.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20STLD lead: Reversed — SCCO led by 11 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; STLD now leads by 1.
- Today
- STLD +1
- 61 vs 62
- 7 sessions ago
- SCCO +1
- 60 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- SCCO +11
- 59 vs 48
- 90 sessions ago
- SCCO +9
- 62 vs 53
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Oct 19 when STLD moved ahead of SCCO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only SCCO
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.73%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
4 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only STLD
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, Uptrend Structure Active.
STLD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.11%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.47%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SCCO closes the Value gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to STLD's edge.
- 2SCCO generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3STLD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SCCO leads on balance| Metric | SCCO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.9% | 17% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 4.7% | 32.6% |
| Gross margin | 62.3% | 14.6% |
| Operating margin | 56.9% | 10.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 49.4% | 17.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.68 | 0.44 |
Performance
STLD leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | SCCO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.4% | 1.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.8% | 4.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 10.2% | 15.3% |
| Year to date | 45.4% | 44.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 57.8% | 71.3% |
Technicals
STLD has the stronger structure| Metric | SCCO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 49.6 | 76.5 |
| ADX (14) | 10 | 11.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.6% | 3.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 8.2% | 10.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 29% | 26.9% |
Risk
Split| Metric | SCCO | STLD |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.36 | 1.1 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.12 | 1.56 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.77 | 2.45 |
| Max drawdown | -28.7% | -22.6% |
| Current drawdown | -7.9% | -13.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 51.7% | 36.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5% | -3.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SCCO or STLD?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, STLD is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 62 against SCCO's 61. The edge comes from value and momentum. SCCO is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SCCO or STLD the better buy right now?
STLD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor STLD over SCCO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SCCO leads Quality by 40 points; STLD leads Value by 26 points; STLD leads Momentum by 23 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SCCO or STLD?
Analyst price targets imply -19.9% upside for SCCO and +10.9% for STLD, so the Street currently favors STLD. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SCCO or STLD?
STLD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. STLD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 26 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SCCO or STLD?
STLD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SCCO or STLD?
STLD on the Momentum factor, by 23 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SCCO or STLD?
STLD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. STLD carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SCCO more profitable than STLD?
SCCO leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 62.3% vs 14.6%; operating margin 56.9% vs 10.6%; ttm roe 49.4% vs 17.6%.
Is STLD's lead over SCCO getting stronger or weaker?
STLD lead: Reversed — SCCO led by 11 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; STLD now leads by 1. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 7 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-19, when STLD moved ahead of SCCO.
What would change the SCCO vs STLD verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SCCO closes the Value gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to STLD's edge; SCCO generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover; STLD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SCCO and STLD?
SCCO: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. STLD: 4 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SCCO is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On STLD it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare SCCO and STLD with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.