SCCO vs TROX Stock Comparison
SCCO currently leads TROX in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 61 vs 34. The clearest difference is quality, while TROX has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between SCCO and TROX?
SCCO leads the current stock comparison as Southern Copper Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Southern Copper Corporation vs Tronox Holdings plc
SCCO leads
SCCO leads by 27 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum. Wall Street currently favors TROX on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support SCCO, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Southern Copper Corporation
Tronox Holdings plc
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SCCO over TROX, 61 versus 34 as of Oct 21, 2026. SCCO's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while TROX holds the stronger value profile. SCCO also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors TROX. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SCCO today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. SCCO lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 27 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Southern Copper Corporation and Tronox Holdings plc across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SCCO and TROX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality88 vs 2SCCO +86
- Momentum60 vs 25SCCO +35
- Value32 vs 65TROX +33
- Risk Resilience64 vs 49SCCO +15
4 of 6 evidence groups favor SCCO. SCCO’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; TROX keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
SCCO's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SCCO and TROX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SCCO (Southern Copper Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
TROX (Tronox Holdings plc): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 38.5% against 29%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SCCOSCCO on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SCCOSCCO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TROXTROX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 33 points.
Momentum
SCCOSCCO on the Momentum factor, by 35 points.
Lower downside
SCCOSCCO on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
TROXTROX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SCCO, analyst targets favor TROX. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | SCCO | TROX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -19.9% | +101.2% | TROX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +28.3% | +91.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Sell | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | SCCO | TROX |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 16.43% | 4.56% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $1.388 | $0.280 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.969 | $0.350 |
| Years increased | 4 | 2 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | No (1) |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | not ranked |
SCCO grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 16.43% a year against TROX's 4.56%. They are ranked in different cohorts — variable-dividend payers and US dividend-paying corporations — so their ranks are not comparable with each other.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SCCO. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SCCO | 61 vs 34 |
| Fundamentals | SCCO | EPS growth 4.7% vs -64.6%; TTM ROE 49.4% vs -40.4%; gross margin 62.3% vs 5.3%; operating margin 56.9% vs -3.5% |
| Valuation | TROX | Value 32 vs 65 |
| Technicals | SCCO | Price vs 50-day -1.6% vs -28.8%; vs 200-day 8.2% vs -49.5% |
| Risk Resilience | SCCO | Risk Resilience 64 vs 49 |
| Analyst expectations | TROX | Target upside -19.9% vs 101.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SCCO and TROX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 27 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SCCO.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20SCCO lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 27 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SCCO +27
- 61 vs 34
- 7 sessions ago
- SCCO +26
- 60 vs 34
- 30 sessions ago
- SCCO +25
- 59 vs 34
- 90 sessions ago
- SCCO +26
- 62 vs 36
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only SCCO
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.65%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only TROX
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (46.96%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode.
SCCO leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.11%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.83%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TROX closes the Quality gap — currently 86 points behind, the largest single contributor to SCCO's edge.
- 2TROX's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SCCO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SCCO leads on balance| Metric | SCCO | TROX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.9% | 14.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 4.7% | -64.6% |
| Gross margin | 62.3% | 5.3% |
| Operating margin | 56.9% | -3.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 49.4% | -40.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.68 | 2.9 |
Performance
SCCO leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | SCCO | TROX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.4% | -3.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.8% | -23% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 3.5% | -45.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 10.2% | -63.5% |
| Year to date | 45.4% | -18.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 57.8% | -7.9% |
Technicals
SCCO has the stronger structure| Metric | SCCO | TROX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 49.6 | 26.3 |
| ADX (14) | 10 | 47.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.6% | -28.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 8.2% | -49.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 29% | 38.5% |
Risk
SCCO is the more resilient| Metric | SCCO | TROX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.36 | 1.84 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.12 | 0.27 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.77 | 0.53 |
| Max drawdown | -28.7% | -67.8% |
| Current drawdown | -7.9% | -67.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 51.7% | 75.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5% | -6.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SCCO or TROX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SCCO is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 61 against TROX's 34. The edge comes from quality and momentum. TROX is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SCCO or TROX the better buy right now?
SCCO carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SCCO over TROX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SCCO leads Quality by 86 points; SCCO leads Momentum by 35 points; TROX leads Value by 33 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SCCO or TROX?
Analyst price targets imply -19.9% upside for SCCO and +101.2% for TROX, so the Street currently favors TROX. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SCCO. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SCCO or TROX?
TROX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TROX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 33 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SCCO or TROX?
SCCO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SCCO or TROX?
SCCO on the Momentum factor, by 35 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SCCO or TROX?
SCCO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SCCO on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SCCO more profitable than TROX?
SCCO leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 62.3% vs 5.3%; operating margin 56.9% vs -3.5%; ttm roe 49.4% vs -40.4%.
Is SCCO's lead over TROX getting stronger or weaker?
SCCO lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 27 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the SCCO vs TROX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TROX closes the Quality gap — currently 86 points behind, the largest single contributor to SCCO's edge; TROX's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SCCO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SCCO and TROX?
SCCO: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. TROX: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SCCO is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TROX it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare SCCO and TROX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.