SDGR vs SOUN Stock Comparison
SDGR currently leads SOUN in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 56 vs 37. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between SDGR and SOUN?
SDGR leads the current stock comparison as Schrödinger, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Schrödinger, Inc. vs SoundHound AI, Inc.
SDGR leads
SDGR leads by 19 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, and the lead has widened from 12 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors SOUN on target upside.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support SDGR, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Schrödinger, Inc.
SoundHound AI, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SDGR over SOUN, 56 versus 37 as of Oct 31, 2026. SDGR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value. SDGR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors SOUN. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SDGR today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. SDGR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 19 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Schrödinger, Inc. and SoundHound AI, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare SDGR and SOUN against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum73 vs 25SDGR +48
- Value52 vs 35SDGR +17
- Quality51 vs 47SDGR +4
- Risk Resilience43 vs 40Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor SDGR. SDGR’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +14
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 8 active signals are unchanged.
SDGR's lead widened by 4 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SDGR and SOUN both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SDGR (Schrödinger, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
SOUN (SoundHound AI, Inc.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SDGRSDGR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SDGRSDGR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SDGRSDGR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points.
Momentum
SDGRSDGR on the Momentum factor, by 48 points.
Lower downside
SOUNSOUN carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
SOUNSOUN on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SDGR, analyst targets favor SOUN. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | SDGR | SOUN | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -30% | +137% | SOUN has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +60% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SDGR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SDGR | 56 vs 37 |
| Fundamentals | SDGR | EPS growth 109.9% vs -66.7%; TTM ROE -16.4% vs -30.2%; gross margin 56.9% vs 37.4%; operating margin -59.2% vs -89.7% |
| Valuation | SDGR | Value 52 vs 35 |
| Technicals | SDGR | Price vs 50-day 10.3% vs -28.5%; vs 200-day 85.4% vs -38.8% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 43 vs 40 |
| Analyst expectations | SOUN | Target upside -30% vs 137% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SDGR and SOUN and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 19 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SDGR.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28SDGR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 19 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SDGR +19
- 56 vs 37
- 7 sessions ago
- SDGR +8
- 45 vs 37
- 30 sessions ago
- SDGR +12
- 51 vs 39
- 90 sessions ago
- SDGR +12
- 56 vs 44
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only SDGR
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (47.73%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 5 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only SOUN
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (22.80%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (1.4%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode.
SOUN is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -9.5%, AIQ +4 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.21%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SOUN closes the Momentum gap — currently 48 points behind, the largest single contributor to SDGR's edge.
- 2SOUN's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SDGR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SDGR leads on balance| Metric | SDGR | SOUN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.5% | 40.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 109.9% | -66.7% |
| Gross margin | 56.9% | 37.4% |
| Operating margin | -59.2% | -89.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -16.4% | -30.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.33 | 0.01 |
Performance
SDGR leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | SDGR | SOUN |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 29.2% | -3.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.6% | -26.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 98.2% | -27.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 162.5% | -42.4% |
| Year to date | 71.6% | -55.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 37.1% | -75.3% |
Technicals
SDGR has the stronger structure| Metric | SDGR | SOUN |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 62.9 | 26.5 |
| ADX (14) | 25.9 | 47 |
| Price vs 50-day | 10.3% | -28.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 85.4% | -38.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 103.6% | 54.7% |
Risk
Split| Metric | SDGR | SOUN |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.68 | 3.03 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.79 | -1.72 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.42 | -3.1 |
| Max drawdown | -49.1% | -76.6% |
| Current drawdown | -5.3% | -75.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 65.2% | 69.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.4% | -7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SDGR or SOUN?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SDGR is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 56 against SOUN's 37. The edge comes from momentum and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SDGR or SOUN the better buy right now?
SDGR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SDGR over SOUN?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SDGR leads Momentum by 48 points; SDGR leads Value by 17 points; SDGR leads Quality by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SDGR or SOUN?
Analyst price targets imply -30% upside for SDGR and +137% for SOUN, so the Street currently favors SOUN. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SDGR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SDGR or SOUN?
SDGR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SDGR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SDGR or SOUN?
SDGR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SDGR or SOUN?
SDGR on the Momentum factor, by 48 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SDGR or SOUN?
SOUN is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SOUN carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SDGR more profitable than SOUN?
SDGR leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 56.9% vs 37.4%; operating margin -59.2% vs -89.7%; ttm roe -16.4% vs -30.2%.
Is SDGR's lead over SOUN getting stronger or weaker?
SDGR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 19 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the SDGR vs SOUN verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SOUN closes the Momentum gap — currently 48 points behind, the largest single contributor to SDGR's edge; SOUN's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SDGR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SDGR and SOUN?
SDGR: 5 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. SOUN: 1 bullish / 5 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SDGR is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SOUN it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare SDGR and SOUN with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.