SEDG vs SPWR Stock Comparison
Compare SEDG and SPWR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between SEDG and SPWR?
SPWR leads the current stock comparison as SunPower Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. vs SunPower Inc.
SPWR leads
SPWR leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 19 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support SPWR, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
SunPower Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SPWR over SEDG, 60 versus 47 as of Sep 11, 2026. SPWR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while SEDG holds the stronger risk resilience profile. SPWR also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SPWR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. SPWR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 19 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
Compare SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. and SunPower Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare SEDG and SPWR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality26 vs 78SPWR +52
- Risk Resilience43 vs 30SEDG +13
- Momentum62 vs 52SEDG +10
- Value57 vs 65SPWR +8
3 of 6 evidence groups favor SPWR. SPWR’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; SEDG keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +9
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No new signals fired.
SPWR's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SEDG and SPWR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SPWR (SunPower Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
SEDG (SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, momentum, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SPWRSPWR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SEDGSEDG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SPWRSPWR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points.
Momentum
SEDGSEDG on the Momentum factor, by 10 points.
Lower downside
SEDGSEDG on Risk Resilience, by 13 points.
Analyst upside
SPWRSPWR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SEDG | SPWR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +8.9% | +1682% | SPWR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +76.8% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SPWR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SPWR | 47 vs 60 |
| Fundamentals | SEDGon balance | revenue growth 11.5% vs -24.6%; EPS growth 47.9% vs -80.9%; TTM ROE -62.5% vs 26.1%; gross margin 22.2% vs 48.8%; operating margin -9.7% vs -24.5% — SEDG takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SPWR | Value 57 vs 65 |
| Technicals | SEDG | Price vs 50-day -14.6% vs -15.5%; vs 200-day -12.7% vs -67.7% |
| Risk Resilience | SEDG | Risk Resilience 43 vs 30 |
| Analyst expectations | SPWR | Target upside 8.9% vs 1682% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SEDG and SPWR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SPWR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SPWR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 19 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SPWR +13
- 47 vs 60
- 7 sessions ago
- SPWR +17
- 45 vs 62
- 30 sessions ago
- SPWR +19
- 39 vs 58
- 90 sessions ago
- SPWR +16
- 41 vs 57
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.61%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (172.10%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (14.04%)
SPWR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -5.63%, AIQ +2 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.77%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SEDG closes the Quality gap — currently 52 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPWR's edge.
- 2SEDG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SPWR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 13-point move would eliminate SPWR's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SEDG leads on balance| Metric | SEDG | SPWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 11.5% | -24.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 47.9% | -80.9% |
| Gross margin | 22.2% | 48.8% |
| Operating margin | -9.7% | -24.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -62.5% | 26.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.96 | -5.03 |
Performance
SEDG leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | SEDG | SPWR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 8.2% | 31.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 14.8% | 34.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -32.6% | -55.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 1.8% | -74.8% |
| Year to date | 27.4% | -77.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 9.9% | -76.7% |
Technicals
SEDG has the stronger structure| Metric | SEDG | SPWR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 69.6 | 62.7 |
| ADX (14) | 17 | 23.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -14.6% | -15.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -12.7% | -67.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 73% | 234.3% |
Risk
SEDG is the more resilient| Metric | SEDG | SPWR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.54 | 2.55 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.66 | -0.82 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.07 | -1.29 |
| Max drawdown | -62% | -89.7% |
| Current drawdown | -53.2% | -83.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 99.6% | 109.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -9% | -9.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SEDG or SPWR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SPWR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 60 against SEDG's 47. The edge comes from quality and value. SEDG is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SEDG or SPWR the better buy right now?
SPWR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SPWR over SEDG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SPWR leads Quality by 52 points; SEDG leads Risk Resilience by 13 points; SEDG leads Momentum by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SEDG or SPWR?
Analyst price targets imply +8.9% upside for SEDG and +1682% for SPWR, so the Street currently favors SPWR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SEDG or SPWR?
SPWR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SPWR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SEDG or SPWR?
SEDG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SEDG or SPWR?
SEDG on the Momentum factor, by 10 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SEDG or SPWR?
SEDG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SEDG on Risk Resilience, by 13 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SEDG more profitable than SPWR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 22.2% vs 48.8%; operating margin -9.7% vs -24.5%; ttm roe -62.5% vs 26.1%. SEDG leads on one measure and SPWR on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SPWR's lead over SEDG getting stronger or weaker?
SPWR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 19 to 13 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the SEDG vs SPWR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SEDG closes the Quality gap — currently 52 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPWR's edge; SEDG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SPWR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 6 points over 30 sessions, and a further 13-point move would eliminate SPWR's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about SEDG and SPWR?
SEDG: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. SPWR: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SEDG is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SPWR it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare SEDG and SPWR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.