SEDG vs WKHS Stock Comparison
Compare SEDG and WKHS across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between SEDG and WKHS?
SEDG leads the current stock comparison as SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. vs Workhorse Group Inc.
SEDG leads
SEDG leads by 17 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 0 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors WKHS on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support SEDG, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
Workhorse Group Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SEDG over WKHS, 47 versus 30 as of Sep 11, 2026. SEDG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. SEDG also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors WKHS. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SEDG today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the lead has swung materially session to session. SEDG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 17 points over 30 sessions. SEDG leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. and Workhorse Group Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare SEDG and WKHS against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality26 vs 0SEDG +26
- Risk Resilience43 vs 25SEDG +18
- Value57 vs 43SEDG +14
- Momentum62 vs 52SEDG +10
4 of 6 evidence groups favor SEDG. SEDG’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +9
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No new signals fired.
SEDG's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SEDG and WKHS both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SEDG (SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
WKHS (Workhorse Group Inc.): the counter-case, on technicals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 81.6% against 73%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SEDGSEDG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SEDGSEDG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SEDGSEDG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points.
Momentum
SEDGSEDG on the Momentum factor, by 10 points.
Lower downside
SEDGSEDG on Risk Resilience, by 18 points.
Analyst upside
WKHSWKHS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SEDG, analyst targets favor WKHS. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | SEDG | WKHS | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +8.9% | +99.3% | WKHS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +76.8% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SEDG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SEDG | 47 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | SEDG | revenue growth 11.5% vs -17.7%; EPS growth 47.9% vs 6.5%; TTM ROE -62.5% vs -253.4%; gross margin 22.2% vs -55.3%; operating margin -9.7% vs -266.1% |
| Valuation | SEDG | Value 57 vs 43 |
| Technicals | WKHS | Price vs 50-day -14.6% vs 0%; vs 200-day -12.7% vs -13.2% |
| Risk Resilience | SEDG | Risk Resilience 43 vs 25 |
| Analyst expectations | WKHS | Target upside 8.9% vs 99.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SEDG and WKHS and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 17 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SEDG.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SEDG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 17 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SEDG +17
- 47 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- SEDG +16
- 45 vs 29
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 39 vs 39
- 90 sessions ago
- SEDG +9
- 41 vs 32
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Aug 18 when SEDG moved ahead of WKHS.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.61%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (16.35%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (8.79%)
SEDG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -5.63%, AIQ +2 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.99%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1WKHS closes the Quality gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to SEDG's edge.
- 2WKHS's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SEDG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SEDG leads on balance| Metric | SEDG | WKHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 11.5% | -17.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 47.9% | 6.5% |
| Gross margin | 22.2% | -55.3% |
| Operating margin | -9.7% | -266.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -62.5% | -253.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.96 | 3.88 |
Performance
SEDG leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | SEDG | WKHS |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 8.2% | -6.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 14.8% | -1.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -32.6% | -1.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 1.8% | -13.1% |
| Year to date | 27.4% | -40.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 9.9% | 153.3% |
Technicals
WKHS has the stronger structure| Metric | SEDG | WKHS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 69.6 | 46.6 |
| ADX (14) | 17 | 24 |
| Price vs 50-day | -14.6% | 0% |
| Price vs 200-day | -12.7% | -13.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 73% | 81.6% |
Risk
SEDG is the more resilient| Metric | SEDG | WKHS |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.54 | -0.06 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.66 | 0.89 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.07 | 16.17 |
| Max drawdown | -62% | -69.2% |
| Current drawdown | -53.2% | -60% |
| Annualized volatility | 99.6% | 879.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -9% | -8.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SEDG or WKHS?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SEDG is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 47 against WKHS's 30. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SEDG or WKHS the better buy right now?
SEDG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SEDG over WKHS?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SEDG leads Quality by 26 points; SEDG leads Risk Resilience by 18 points; SEDG leads Value by 14 points. SEDG leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by WKHS simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, SEDG or WKHS?
Analyst price targets imply +8.9% upside for SEDG and +99.3% for WKHS, so the Street currently favors WKHS. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SEDG. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SEDG or WKHS?
SEDG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SEDG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SEDG or WKHS?
SEDG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SEDG or WKHS?
SEDG on the Momentum factor, by 10 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SEDG or WKHS?
SEDG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SEDG on Risk Resilience, by 18 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SEDG more profitable than WKHS?
SEDG leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 22.2% vs -55.3%; operating margin -9.7% vs -266.1%; ttm roe -62.5% vs -253.4%.
Is SEDG's lead over WKHS getting stronger or weaker?
SEDG lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 17 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-18, when SEDG moved ahead of WKHS.
What would change the SEDG vs WKHS verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: WKHS closes the Quality gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to SEDG's edge; WKHS's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SEDG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SEDG and WKHS?
SEDG: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. WKHS: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SEDG is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On WKHS it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare SEDG and WKHS with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.