SIMO vs SNDK Stock Comparison
SNDK currently leads SIMO in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 54 vs 47. The clearest difference is quality, while SIMO has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between SIMO and SNDK?
SNDK leads the current stock comparison as Sandisk Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation vs Sandisk Corporation
SNDK leads
SNDK leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value.
Competitive: 5 of 6 evidence groups support SNDK, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
Sandisk Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SNDK over SIMO, 54 versus 47 as of Oct 21, 2026. SNDK's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while SIMO holds the stronger risk resilience profile. SNDK also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SNDK today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. SNDK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Sandisk Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SIMO and SNDK against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality83 vs 100SNDK +17
- Value38 vs 50SNDK +12
- Risk Resilience45 vs 38SIMO +7
- Momentum15 vs 15Even
5 of 6 evidence groups favor SNDK. SNDK’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; SIMO keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
SNDK's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SIMO and SNDK both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SNDK (Sandisk Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
SIMO (Silicon Motion Technology Corporation): the counter-case, on risk resilience.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SNDKSNDK on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SNDKSNDK on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SNDKSNDK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
SIMOSIMO on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
SNDKSNDK on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SIMO | SNDK | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +30.5% | +41.8% | SNDK has more room |
| Target dispersion | +75.9% | +110% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 16 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SNDK. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SNDK | 47 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | SNDKon balance | revenue growth 31.8% vs 50.7%; EPS growth 102.5% vs 92.9%; TTM ROE 32% vs 93.1%; gross margin 48.9% vs 71.5%; operating margin 16.3% vs 61.2% — SNDK takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SNDK | Value 38 vs 50 |
| Technicals | SNDK | Price vs 50-day -13.1% vs -13.8%; vs 200-day 1.5% vs 11.8% |
| Risk Resilience | SIMO | Risk Resilience 45 vs 38 |
| Analyst expectations | SNDK | Target upside 30.5% vs 41.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SIMO and SNDK and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SNDK.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20SNDK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SNDK +7
- 47 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- SNDK +7
- 47 vs 54
- 30 sessions ago
- SNDK +7
- 60 vs 67
- 90 sessions ago
- SNDK +15
- 61 vs 76
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 12 when SNDK moved ahead of SIMO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
SIMO and SNDK carry the same 5 signals, so the signals do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Keltner Channel Breakdown, RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce, MACD Bearish Crossover.
SNDK leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.02%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.94%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SIMO closes the Quality gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to SNDK's edge.
- 2SIMO's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3SNDK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SNDK leads on balance| Metric | SIMO | SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 31.8% | 50.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 102.5% | 92.9% |
| Gross margin | 48.9% | 71.5% |
| Operating margin | 16.3% | 61.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 32% | 93.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.06 | 0.02 |
Performance
SNDK leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | SIMO | SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -13.4% | -7.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -24.6% | -27.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -21.1% | -14.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 50% | 51.1% |
| Year to date | 130.5% | 475.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 133.1% | 848.6% |
Technicals
SNDK has the stronger structure| Metric | SIMO | SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 21.5 | 22.4 |
| ADX (14) | 22 | 21.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -13.1% | -13.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.5% | 11.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 52.3% | 54.4% |
Risk
SIMO is the more resilient| Metric | SIMO | SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.3 | 3.95 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.31 | 2.54 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.37 | 4.44 |
| Max drawdown | -37.8% | -56.5% |
| Current drawdown | -36.6% | -41.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 86.2% | 113.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -7.6% | -10.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SIMO or SNDK?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SNDK is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 54 against SIMO's 47. The edge comes from quality and value. SIMO is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SIMO or SNDK the better buy right now?
SNDK carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SNDK over SIMO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SNDK leads Quality by 17 points; SNDK leads Value by 12 points; SIMO leads Risk Resilience by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SIMO or SNDK?
Analyst price targets imply +30.5% upside for SIMO and +41.8% for SNDK, so the Street currently favors SNDK. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SIMO or SNDK?
SNDK is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SNDK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SIMO or SNDK?
SNDK on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SIMO or SNDK?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SIMO or SNDK?
SIMO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SIMO on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SIMO more profitable than SNDK?
SNDK leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 48.9% vs 71.5%; operating margin 16.3% vs 61.2%; ttm roe 32% vs 93.1%.
Is SNDK's lead over SIMO getting stronger or weaker?
SNDK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-12, when SNDK moved ahead of SIMO.
What would change the SIMO vs SNDK verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SIMO closes the Quality gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to SNDK's edge; SIMO's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; SNDK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SIMO and SNDK?
SIMO: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. SNDK: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SIMO is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SNDK it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare SIMO and SNDK with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.