SIMO vs SNDK Stock Comparison
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation vs Sandisk Corporation
SNDK leads
SNDK leads by 15 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality. Wall Street currently favors SIMO on target upside.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support SNDK, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
Sandisk Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SNDK over SIMO, 70 versus 55 as of Sep 5, 2026. SNDK's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while SIMO holds the stronger risk resilience profile. SNDK also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors SIMO. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SNDK today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. SNDK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 15 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Sandisk Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare SIMO and SNDK against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25%46 vs 76SNDK +30
- Quality30%83 vs 100SNDK +17
- Value30%38 vs 50SNDK +12
- Risk Resilience15%45 vs 38SIMO +7
4 of 6 evidence groups favor SNDK. SNDK’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; SIMO keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-04, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-03.
Largest factor move: Momentum +10
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +16
New signals
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
SNDK's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SIMO and SNDK both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SNDK (Sandisk Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
SIMO (Silicon Motion Technology Corporation): the counter-case, on risk resilience, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SNDKSNDK on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
SNDKSNDK on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SNDKSNDK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points.
Momentum
SNDKSNDK on the Momentum factor, by 30 points.
Lower downside
SIMOSIMO on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
SIMOSIMO on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SNDK, analyst targets favor SIMO. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | SIMO | SNDK | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +13.2% | +7.1% | SIMO has more room |
| Target dispersion | +75.9% | +122% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 16 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SNDK. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SNDK | 55 vs 70 |
| Fundamentals | SNDKon balance | revenue growth 31.8% vs 50.7%; EPS growth 102.5% vs 92.9%; TTM ROE 32% vs 93.1%; gross margin 48.9% vs 71.5%; operating margin 16.3% vs 61.2% — SNDK takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SNDK | Value 38 vs 50 |
| Technicals | SNDK | Price vs 50-day -4.5% vs 12.2%; vs 200-day 39% vs 73.3% |
| Risk Resilience | SIMO | Risk Resilience 45 vs 38 |
| Analyst expectations | SIMO | Target upside 13.2% vs 7.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SIMO and SNDK and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 15 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SNDK.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 23 – Sep 4SNDK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 15 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SNDK +15
- 55 vs 70
- 7 sessions ago
- SNDK +13
- 58 vs 71
- 30 sessions ago
- SNDK +15
- 54 vs 69
- 90 sessions ago
- SNDK +2
- 63 vs 65
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (45.50%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (7.46%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (54.41%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +8.7%, AIQ +3 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +11.9%, AIQ +4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SIMO closes the Momentum gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to SNDK's edge.
- 2SIMO's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3SNDK's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SNDK leads on balance| Metric | SIMO | SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 31.8% | 50.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 102.5% | 92.9% |
| Gross margin | 48.9% | 71.5% |
| Operating margin | 16.3% | 61.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 32% | 93.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.06 | 0.02 |
Performance
SNDK leads 5 of 5 windows| Metric | SIMO | SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 4.2% | 17.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0% | 43.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -1% | 11.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 116.5% | 230% |
| Year to date | 176.4% | 633% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 222.3% | — |
Technicals
SNDK has the stronger structure| Metric | SIMO | SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 44.3 | 46.7 |
| ADX (14) | 10.4 | 11.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.5% | 12.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 39% | 73.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 87.1% | 89.7% |
Risk
SIMO is the more resilient| Metric | SIMO | SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.35 | 4.23 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.72 | 3.42 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.35 | 5.92 |
| Max drawdown | -37.8% | -56.5% |
| Current drawdown | -23.9% | -25.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 83.4% | 116.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -7.3% | -10.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SIMO or SNDK?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SNDK is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 70 against SIMO's 55. The edge comes from momentum and quality. SIMO is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SIMO or SNDK the better buy right now?
SNDK carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SNDK over SIMO?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. SNDK leads Momentum by 30 points; SNDK leads Quality by 17 points; SNDK leads Value by 12 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SIMO or SNDK?
Analyst price targets imply +13.2% upside for SIMO and +7.1% for SNDK, so the Street currently favors SIMO. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SNDK. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SIMO or SNDK?
SNDK is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SNDK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 12 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SIMO or SNDK?
SNDK on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SIMO or SNDK?
SNDK on the Momentum factor, by 30 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SIMO or SNDK?
SIMO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SIMO on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SIMO more profitable than SNDK?
SNDK leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 48.9% vs 71.5%; operating margin 16.3% vs 61.2%; ttm roe 32% vs 93.1%.
Is SNDK's lead over SIMO getting stronger or weaker?
SNDK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 15 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-23 and 2026-09-04. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the SIMO vs SNDK verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SIMO closes the Momentum gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to SNDK's edge; SIMO's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; SNDK's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SIMO and SNDK?
SIMO: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. SNDK: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on SIMO is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SNDK it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare SIMO and SNDK with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.