SIRI vs VZ Stock Comparison
SIRI currently leads VZ in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 59 vs 47. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between SIRI and VZ?
SIRI leads the current stock comparison as Sirius XM Holdings Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Sirius XM Holdings Inc. vs Verizon Communications Inc.
SIRI leads
SIRI leads by 12 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 4 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support SIRI, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
Verizon Communications Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SIRI over VZ, 59 versus 47 as of Oct 21, 2026. SIRI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience. SIRI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SIRI today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. SIRI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Sirius XM Holdings Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SIRI and VZ against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum65 vs 36SIRI +29
- Risk Resilience58 vs 34SIRI +24
- Value66 vs 64Even
- Quality46 vs 45Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor SIRI. SIRI’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
SIRI's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SIRI and VZ both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SIRI (Sirius XM Holdings Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
VZ (Verizon Communications Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals — but at materially higher volatility, 41.3% against 20.3%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SIRISIRI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SIRISIRI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
SIRISIRI on the Momentum factor, by 29 points.
Lower downside
SIRISIRI on Risk Resilience, by 24 points.
Analyst upside
SIRISIRI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SIRI | VZ | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +24.8% | +10.2% | SIRI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +50.5% | +19.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | SIRI | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 14.63% | 1.95% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.546 | $2.473 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $1.080 | $2.723 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #44 | #332 |
SIRI grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 14.63% a year against VZ's 1.95%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SIRI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SIRI | 59 vs 47 |
| Fundamentals | VZon balance | EPS growth -2.7% vs -23.3%; TTM ROE 7.5% vs 15.5%; gross margin 46.2% vs 59.1%; operating margin 19.2% vs 20.5% — VZ takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 66 vs 64 |
| Technicals | SIRI | Price vs 50-day -2.5% vs -8.7%; vs 200-day 4.6% vs -4.5% |
| Risk Resilience | SIRI | Risk Resilience 58 vs 34 |
| Analyst expectations | SIRI | Target upside 24.8% vs 10.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SIRI and VZ and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 12 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SIRI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20SIRI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SIRI +12
- 59 vs 47
- 7 sessions ago
- SIRI +13
- 58 vs 45
- 30 sessions ago
- SIRI +4
- 49 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- VZ +4
- 50 vs 54
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Sep 2 when SIRI moved ahead of VZ.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
SIRI and VZ carry the same 3 signals, so the signals do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.74%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.2%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1VZ closes the Momentum gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to SIRI's edge.
- 2VZ's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3SIRI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
VZ leads on balance| Metric | SIRI | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.3% | -0.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -2.7% | -23.3% |
| Gross margin | 46.2% | 59.1% |
| Operating margin | 19.2% | 20.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 7.5% | 15.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.79 | 1.81 |
Performance
SIRI leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | SIRI | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.2% | 2.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.4% | -4.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -9% | 0.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 3.7% | -3.7% |
| Year to date | 35.8% | 9.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 27.4% | 10.4% |
Technicals
SIRI has the stronger structure| Metric | SIRI | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 68.8 | 43.4 |
| ADX (14) | 21.2 | 31.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2.5% | -8.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 4.6% | -4.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 20.3% | 41.3% |
Risk
SIRI is the more resilient| Metric | SIRI | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.27 | -0.37 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.77 | 0.34 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.35 | 0.46 |
| Max drawdown | -21.3% | -19.1% |
| Current drawdown | -16.7% | -13.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 33.4% | 27.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.9% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SIRI or VZ?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SIRI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 59 against VZ's 47. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SIRI or VZ the better buy right now?
SIRI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SIRI over VZ?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SIRI leads Momentum by 29 points; SIRI leads Risk Resilience by 24 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SIRI or VZ?
Analyst price targets imply +24.8% upside for SIRI and +10.2% for VZ, so the Street currently favors SIRI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SIRI or VZ?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SIRI or VZ?
SIRI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SIRI or VZ?
SIRI on the Momentum factor, by 29 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SIRI or VZ?
SIRI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SIRI on Risk Resilience, by 24 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SIRI more profitable than VZ?
VZ leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 46.2% vs 59.1%; operating margin 19.2% vs 20.5%; ttm roe 7.5% vs 15.5%.
Is SIRI's lead over VZ getting stronger or weaker?
SIRI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 12 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-02, when SIRI moved ahead of VZ.
What would change the SIRI vs VZ verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: VZ closes the Momentum gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to SIRI's edge; VZ's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; SIRI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SIRI and VZ?
SIRI: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. VZ: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on SIRI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On VZ it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare SIRI and VZ with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.