SLAB vs SNDK Stock Comparison
SNDK currently leads SLAB in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 54 vs 53. The clearest difference is quality, while SLAB has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between SLAB and SNDK?
SNDK leads the current stock comparison as Sandisk Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Silicon Laboratories Inc. vs Sandisk Corporation
SNDK leads
SNDK leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 11 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support SNDK, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Silicon Laboratories Inc.
Sandisk Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SNDK over SLAB, 54 versus 53 as of Oct 21, 2026. SNDK's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while SLAB holds the stronger risk resilience profile. SNDK also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SNDK today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. SNDK lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Silicon Laboratories Inc. and Sandisk Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare SLAB and SNDK against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience90 vs 38SLAB +52
- Quality57 vs 100SNDK +43
- Momentum56 vs 15SLAB +41
- Value29 vs 50SNDK +21
3 of 6 evidence groups favor SNDK. SNDK’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; SLAB keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
SNDK's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SLAB and SNDK both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SNDK (Sandisk Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
SLAB (Silicon Laboratories Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SNDKSNDK on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SNDKSNDK on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SNDKSNDK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 21 points.
Momentum
SLABSLAB on the Momentum factor, by 41 points.
Lower downside
SLABSLAB on Risk Resilience, by 52 points.
Analyst upside
SNDKSNDK on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SLAB | SNDK | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +4.2% | +41.8% | SNDK has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +110% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 16 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SNDK. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 53 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | SNDK | revenue growth 6.9% vs 50.7%; EPS growth 33.3% vs 92.9%; TTM ROE -3.6% vs 93.1%; gross margin 59.9% vs 71.5%; operating margin -3.8% vs 61.2% |
| Valuation | SNDK | Value 29 vs 50 |
| Technicals | SLAB | Price vs 50-day 0.7% vs -13.8%; vs 200-day 6.6% vs 11.8% |
| Risk Resilience | SLAB | Risk Resilience 90 vs 38 |
| Analyst expectations | SNDK | Target upside 4.2% vs 41.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SLAB and SNDK and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SNDK.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20SNDK lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SNDK +1
- 53 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- Level
- 54 vs 54
- 30 sessions ago
- SNDK +11
- 56 vs 67
- 90 sessions ago
- SNDK +18
- 58 vs 76
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Oct 9 when SLAB moved ahead of SNDK.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only SLAB
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (0.43%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.9%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only SNDK
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.97%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, MACD Bearish Crossover.
SNDK leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.28%, AIQ -1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.94%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SLAB closes the Quality gap — currently 43 points behind, the largest single contributor to SNDK's edge.
- 2SLAB's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3SNDK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 10 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate SNDK's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SNDK leads on balance| Metric | SLAB | SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 6.9% | 50.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 33.3% | 92.9% |
| Gross margin | 59.9% | 71.5% |
| Operating margin | -3.8% | 61.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -3.6% | 93.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0 | 0.02 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | SLAB | SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0% | -7.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.4% | -27.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 1.8% | -14.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 3.7% | 51.1% |
| Year to date | 69.2% | 475.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 60.5% | 848.6% |
Technicals
SLAB has the stronger structure| Metric | SLAB | SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 43.5 | 22.4 |
| ADX (14) | 19.1 | 21.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.7% | -13.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 6.6% | 11.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 3% | 54.4% |
Risk
SLAB is the more resilient| Metric | SLAB | SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.35 | 3.95 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.05 | 2.54 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.45 | 4.44 |
| Max drawdown | -15.6% | -56.5% |
| Current drawdown | -0.8% | -41.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 53.3% | 113.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.4% | -10.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SLAB or SNDK?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SNDK is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 54 against SLAB's 53. The edge comes from quality and value. SLAB is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SLAB or SNDK the better buy right now?
SNDK carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SNDK over SLAB?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SLAB leads Risk Resilience by 52 points; SNDK leads Quality by 43 points; SLAB leads Momentum by 41 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SLAB or SNDK?
Analyst price targets imply +4.2% upside for SLAB and +41.8% for SNDK, so the Street currently favors SNDK. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SLAB or SNDK?
SNDK is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SNDK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 21 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SLAB or SNDK?
SNDK on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SLAB or SNDK?
SLAB on the Momentum factor, by 41 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SLAB or SNDK?
SLAB is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SLAB on Risk Resilience, by 52 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SLAB more profitable than SNDK?
SNDK leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 59.9% vs 71.5%; operating margin -3.8% vs 61.2%; ttm roe -3.6% vs 93.1%.
Is SNDK's lead over SLAB getting stronger or weaker?
SNDK lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-10-09, when SLAB moved ahead of SNDK.
What would change the SLAB vs SNDK verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SLAB closes the Quality gap — currently 43 points behind, the largest single contributor to SNDK's edge; SLAB's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; SNDK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 10 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate SNDK's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about SLAB and SNDK?
SLAB: 4 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. SNDK: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SLAB is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SNDK it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare SLAB and SNDK with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.