SLAB vs TEL Stock Comparison
Silicon Laboratories Inc. vs TE Connectivity plc
TEL leads
TEL leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 7 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support TEL, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Silicon Laboratories Inc.
TE Connectivity plc
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TEL over SLAB, 60 versus 57 as of Sep 5, 2026. TEL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while SLAB holds the stronger risk resilience profile. TEL also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TEL today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. TEL lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 7 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Silicon Laboratories Inc. and TE Connectivity plc across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare SLAB and TEL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30%29 vs 67TEL +38
- Risk Resilience15%89 vs 63SLAB +26
- Momentum25%73 vs 48SLAB +25
- Quality30%57 vs 63TEL +6
3 of 6 evidence groups favor TEL. TEL’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; SLAB keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-04, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-03.
Largest factor move: Momentum -6
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
TEL's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SLAB and TEL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TEL (TE Connectivity plc): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
SLAB (Silicon Laboratories Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TELTEL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
SLABSLAB on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TELTEL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 38 points.
Momentum
SLABSLAB on the Momentum factor, by 25 points.
Lower downside
SLABSLAB on Risk Resilience, by 26 points.
Analyst upside
TELTEL on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SLAB | TEL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +4.7% | +22% | TEL has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +29.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TEL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 57 vs 60 |
| Fundamentals | TELon balance | revenue growth 6.9% vs 8.8%; EPS growth 33.3% vs -12%; TTM ROE -3.6% vs 23.2%; gross margin 59.9% vs 35.4%; operating margin -3.8% vs 19.1% — TEL takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TEL | Value 29 vs 67 |
| Technicals | SLAB | Price vs 50-day 1% vs 1.5%; vs 200-day 13.8% vs -3.5% |
| Risk Resilience | SLAB | Risk Resilience 89 vs 63 |
| Analyst expectations | TEL | Target upside 4.7% vs 22% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SLAB and TEL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TEL.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 23 – Sep 4TEL lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 7 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TEL +3
- 57 vs 60
- 7 sessions ago
- SLAB +1
- 55 vs 54
- 30 sessions ago
- TEL +7
- 57 vs 64
- 90 sessions ago
- TEL +1
- 55 vs 56
The lead changed hands 9 times in this window, most recently on Sep 3 when TEL moved ahead of SLAB.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (12.51%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (5.18%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
TEL leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.06%, AIQ -2 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.36%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SLAB closes the Value gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to TEL's edge.
- 2SLAB's BB Upper Band Breach resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3TEL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate TEL's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TEL leads on balance| Metric | SLAB | TEL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 6.9% | 8.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 33.3% | -12% |
| Gross margin | 59.9% | 35.4% |
| Operating margin | -3.8% | 19.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -3.6% | 23.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0 | 0.43 |
Performance
SLAB leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | SLAB | TEL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.9% | 3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.6% | -3.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 1.1% | -1.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 8.8% | 1.4% |
| Year to date | 68.5% | -8.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 68.3% | 1.3% |
Technicals
SLAB has the stronger structure| Metric | SLAB | TEL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 63 | 40.7 |
| ADX (14) | 16.2 | 12.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1% | 1.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 13.8% | -3.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 3.7% | 31.7% |
Risk
SLAB is the more resilient| Metric | SLAB | TEL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.59 | 1.56 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.05 | 0.06 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.8 | 0.08 |
| Max drawdown | -17.8% | -21.4% |
| Current drawdown | -0.1% | -16.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 55.2% | 34.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.5% | -3.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SLAB or TEL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TEL is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 60 against SLAB's 57. The edge comes from value and quality. SLAB is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SLAB or TEL the better buy right now?
TEL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TEL over SLAB?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. TEL leads Value by 38 points; SLAB leads Risk Resilience by 26 points; SLAB leads Momentum by 25 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SLAB or TEL?
Analyst price targets imply +4.7% upside for SLAB and +22% for TEL, so the Street currently favors TEL. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SLAB or TEL?
TEL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TEL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 38 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SLAB or TEL?
SLAB on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SLAB or TEL?
SLAB on the Momentum factor, by 25 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SLAB or TEL?
SLAB is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SLAB on Risk Resilience, by 26 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SLAB more profitable than TEL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 59.9% vs 35.4%; operating margin -3.8% vs 19.1%; ttm roe -3.6% vs 23.2%. SLAB leads on one measure and TEL on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is TEL's lead over SLAB getting stronger or weaker?
TEL lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 7 to 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-23 and 2026-09-04. The lead has changed hands 9 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-03, when TEL moved ahead of SLAB.
What would change the SLAB vs TEL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SLAB closes the Value gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to TEL's edge; SLAB's BB Upper Band Breach resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; TEL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate TEL's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about SLAB and TEL?
SLAB: 5 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. TEL: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SLAB is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TEL it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare SLAB and TEL with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.