SLG vs VNO Stock Comparison
SLG currently leads VNO in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 44 vs 39. The clearest difference is value, while VNO has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between SLG and VNO?
SLG leads the current stock comparison as SL Green Realty Corp., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
SL Green Realty Corp. vs Vornado Realty Trust
SLG leads
SLG leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support SLG, and its current signal state is conflicted.
SL Green Realty Corp.
Vornado Realty Trust
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SLG over VNO, 44 versus 39 as of Oct 21, 2026. SLG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while VNO holds the stronger risk resilience profile. SLG also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SLG today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. SLG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare SL Green Realty Corp. and Vornado Realty Trust across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SLG and VNO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value63 vs 46SLG +17
- Risk Resilience42 vs 54VNO +12
- Momentum41 vs 37SLG +4
- Quality30 vs 27Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor SLG. SLG’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; VNO keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +17
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
SLG's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SLG and VNO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SLG (SL Green Realty Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
VNO (Vornado Realty Trust): the counter-case, on risk resilience, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SLGSLG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
VNOVNO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SLGSLG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points.
Momentum
SLGSLG on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
VNOVNO on Risk Resilience, by 12 points.
Analyst upside
SLGSLG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SLG | VNO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +23.9% | +14.9% | SLG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +57.1% | +39.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | SLG | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 4.32% | -20.84% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $2.293 | $2.380 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.833 | $0.740 |
| Years increased | 2 | 1 |
| No cut in window | No (3) | No (2) |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | not ranked |
SLG grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 4.32% a year against VNO's -20.84%.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SLG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SLG | 44 vs 39 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth 68.3% vs 173.2%; TTM ROE -4.6% vs 1.1%; gross margin 51.1% vs 42.6%; operating margin 40.9% vs 10.9% |
| Valuation | SLG | Value 63 vs 46 |
| Technicals | VNO | Price vs 50-day -11.1% vs -7.7%; vs 200-day 0.6% vs -0.7% |
| Risk Resilience | VNO | Risk Resilience 42 vs 54 |
| Analyst expectations | SLG | Target upside 23.9% vs 14.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SLG and VNO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SLG.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20SLG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SLG +5
- 44 vs 39
- 7 sessions ago
- SLG +4
- 42 vs 38
- 30 sessions ago
- SLG +3
- 44 vs 41
- 90 sessions ago
- SLG +14
- 51 vs 37
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only SLG
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.79%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only VNO
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Golden Cross Active.
SLG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.72%, AIQ +4 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.66%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1VNO closes the Value gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to SLG's edge.
- 2VNO's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3SLG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | SLG | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.3% | 0.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 68.3% | 173.2% |
| Gross margin | 51.1% | 42.6% |
| Operating margin | 40.9% | 10.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -4.6% | 1.1% |
| Debt to equity | 1.51 | 1.57 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | SLG | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.9% | -2.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -10.4% | -6.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -6.2% | -14% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 7.9% | 13.9% |
| Year to date | 2.5% | -0.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -12.7% | -16.2% |
Technicals
VNO has the stronger structure| Metric | SLG | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41.3 | 43.9 |
| ADX (14) | 39.8 | 30.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -11.1% | -7.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.6% | -0.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 39.2% | 28.2% |
Risk
VNO is the more resilient| Metric | SLG | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.97 | 1 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.21 | -0.48 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.35 | -0.79 |
| Max drawdown | -33.6% | -37.7% |
| Current drawdown | -21.4% | -19.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.8% | 32.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.7% | -3.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SLG or VNO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SLG is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 44 against VNO's 39. The edge comes from value and momentum. VNO is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SLG or VNO the better buy right now?
SLG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SLG over VNO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SLG leads Value by 17 points; VNO leads Risk Resilience by 12 points; SLG leads Momentum by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SLG or VNO?
Analyst price targets imply +23.9% upside for SLG and +14.9% for VNO, so the Street currently favors SLG. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SLG or VNO?
SLG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SLG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SLG or VNO?
VNO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SLG or VNO?
SLG on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SLG or VNO?
VNO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. VNO on Risk Resilience, by 12 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SLG more profitable than VNO?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 51.1% vs 42.6%; operating margin 40.9% vs 10.9%; ttm roe -4.6% vs 1.1%. SLG leads on two measures and VNO on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SLG's lead over VNO getting stronger or weaker?
SLG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the SLG vs VNO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: VNO closes the Value gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to SLG's edge; VNO's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; SLG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SLG and VNO?
SLG: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. VNO: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SLG is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On VNO it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare SLG and VNO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.