SPGI vs TPG Stock Comparison
Compare SPGI and TPG across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between SPGI and TPG?
SPGI leads the current stock comparison as S&P Global Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
S&P Global Inc. vs TPG Inc.
SPGI leads
SPGI leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support SPGI.
S&P Global Inc.
TPG Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SPGI over TPG, 43 versus 35 as of Sep 11, 2026. SPGI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. SPGI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SPGI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree.
Compare S&P Global Inc. and TPG Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare SPGI and TPG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality68 vs 49SPGI +19
- Risk Resilience57 vs 41SPGI +16
- Value26 vs 29Even
- Momentum25 vs 22Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor SPGI. SPGI’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
The central trade-off
SPGI (S&P Global Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
TPG (TPG Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 47.5% against 32.1%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SPGISPGI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TPGTPG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
SPGISPGI on Risk Resilience, by 16 points.
Analyst upside
SPGISPGI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SPGI | TPG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +24.7% | +21% | SPGI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +3.1% | +31.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SPGI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SPGI | 43 vs 35 |
| Fundamentals | TPGon balance | EPS growth -12.2% vs 9.8%; TTM ROE 15.5% vs 18.6%; gross margin 70.9% vs 95.9%; operating margin 46.3% vs 17.7% — TPG takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 26 vs 29 |
| Technicals | TPG | Price vs 50-day -4.1% vs 0.3%; vs 200-day -8.3% vs -4.3% |
| Risk Resilience | SPGI | Risk Resilience 57 vs 41 |
| Analyst expectations | SPGI | Target upside 24.7% vs 21% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SPGI and TPG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SPGI.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TPG closes the Quality gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPGI's edge.
- 2TPG generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3SPGI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TPG leads on balance| Metric | SPGI | TPG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -0.6% | 271.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -12.2% | 9.8% |
| Gross margin | 70.9% | 95.9% |
| Operating margin | 46.3% | 17.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 15.5% | 18.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.5 | 2.42 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | SPGI | TPG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.9% | -10.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.1% | -7.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.7% | 12.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -4.3% | 15.4% |
| Year to date | -21.5% | -26.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -24.8% | -20.5% |
Technicals
TPG has the stronger structure| Metric | SPGI | TPG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 39 | 30.2 |
| ADX (14) | 18.1 | 35.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.1% | 0.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -8.3% | -4.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 32.1% | 47.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SPGI or TPG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SPGI is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 43 against TPG's 35. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SPGI or TPG the better buy right now?
SPGI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SPGI over TPG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SPGI leads Quality by 19 points; SPGI leads Risk Resilience by 16 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SPGI or TPG?
Analyst price targets imply +24.7% upside for SPGI and +21% for TPG, so the Street currently favors SPGI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SPGI or TPG?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SPGI or TPG?
TPG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SPGI or TPG?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SPGI or TPG?
SPGI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SPGI on Risk Resilience, by 16 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SPGI more profitable than TPG?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 70.9% vs 95.9%; operating margin 46.3% vs 17.7%; ttm roe 15.5% vs 18.6%. SPGI leads on one measure and TPG on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
What would change the SPGI vs TPG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TPG closes the Quality gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPGI's edge; TPG generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; SPGI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Compare SPGI and TPG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.