SPGI vs TROW Stock Comparison
TROW currently leads SPGI in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 62 vs 60. The clearest difference is value, while SPGI has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between SPGI and TROW?
TROW leads the current stock comparison as T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
S&P Global Inc. vs T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
TROW leads
TROW leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 14 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support TROW, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
S&P Global Inc.
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TROW over SPGI, 62 versus 60 as of Oct 31, 2026. TROW's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while SPGI holds the stronger momentum profile. TROW also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TROW today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. TROW lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare S&P Global Inc. and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SPGI and TROW against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum91 vs 49SPGI +42
- Value26 vs 51TROW +25
- Quality68 vs 80TROW +12
- Risk Resilience63 vs 71TROW +8
3 of 6 evidence groups favor TROW. TROW’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; SPGI keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-30, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-29.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
TROW's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SPGI and TROW both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TROW (T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
SPGI (S&P Global Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TROWTROW on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TROWTROW on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TROWTROW on the peer-relative Value factor, by 25 points.
Momentum
SPGISPGI on the Momentum factor, by 42 points.
Lower downside
TROWTROW on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SPGI | TROW | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +8.6% | +8.1% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +10.7% | +12.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | SPGI | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 7.46% | 7.13% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $2.680 | $3.600 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $3.840 | $5.080 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #168 | #185 |
SPGI grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 7.46% a year against TROW's 7.13%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TROW. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 60 vs 62 |
| Fundamentals | TROWon balance | revenue growth -0.6% vs 2.7%; EPS growth -12.2% vs 29.1%; TTM ROE 15.5% vs 20.4%; gross margin 70.9% vs 70.7%; operating margin 46.3% vs 30.3% — TROW takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TROW | Value 26 vs 51 |
| Technicals | SPGI | Price vs 50-day 11% vs -1.9%; vs 200-day 4.2% vs 0.3% |
| Risk Resilience | TROW | Risk Resilience 63 vs 71 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 8.6% vs 8.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SPGI and TROW and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TROW.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jul 1 – Oct 30TROW lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TROW +2
- 60 vs 62
- 7 sessions ago
- TROW +1
- 61 vs 62
- 30 sessions ago
- TROW +14
- 50 vs 64
- 90 sessions ago
- TROW +1
- 59 vs 60
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 28 when TROW moved ahead of SPGI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only SPGI
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.64%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only TROW
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.17%)
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
SPGI is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.28%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.56%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SPGI closes the Value gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to TROW's edge.
- 2SPGI's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3TROW's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 12 points over 30 sessions, and a further 2-point move would eliminate TROW's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TROW leads on balance| Metric | SPGI | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -0.6% | 2.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -12.2% | 29.1% |
| Gross margin | 70.9% | 70.7% |
| Operating margin | 46.3% | 30.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 15.5% | 20.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.5 | 0.04 |
Performance
SPGI leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | SPGI | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.4% | 0.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 12.5% | 0% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 8.3% | -12.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 3.7% | 3.5% |
| Year to date | -14% | 1.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -8.2% | 0.4% |
Technicals
SPGI has the stronger structure| Metric | SPGI | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 85 | 49.2 |
| ADX (14) | 32.1 | 24.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | 11% | -1.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 4.2% | 0.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 21.3% | 18.9% |
Risk
TROW is the more resilient| Metric | SPGI | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.32 | 0.8 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.29 | -0.09 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.35 | -0.11 |
| Max drawdown | -29.3% | -20.9% |
| Current drawdown | -17.8% | -14.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 30.2% | 23.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.9% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SPGI or TROW?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TROW is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 62 against SPGI's 60. The edge comes from value and quality. SPGI is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SPGI or TROW the better buy right now?
TROW carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TROW over SPGI?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SPGI leads Momentum by 42 points; TROW leads Value by 25 points; TROW leads Quality by 12 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SPGI or TROW?
Analyst price targets imply +8.6% upside for SPGI and +8.1% for TROW. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SPGI or TROW?
TROW is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TROW on the peer-relative Value factor, by 25 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SPGI or TROW?
TROW on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SPGI or TROW?
SPGI on the Momentum factor, by 42 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SPGI or TROW?
TROW is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TROW on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SPGI more profitable than TROW?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 70.9% vs 70.7%; operating margin 46.3% vs 30.3%; ttm roe 15.5% vs 20.4%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is TROW's lead over SPGI getting stronger or weaker?
TROW lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-07-01 and 2026-10-30. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-28, when TROW moved ahead of SPGI.
What would change the SPGI vs TROW verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SPGI closes the Value gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to TROW's edge; SPGI's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; TROW's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 12 points over 30 sessions, and a further 2-point move would eliminate TROW's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about SPGI and TROW?
SPGI: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. TROW: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SPGI is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On TROW it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare SPGI and TROW with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.