SR vs SWX Stock Comparison
SWX currently leads SR in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 58 vs 56. The clearest difference is quality, while SR has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between SR and SWX?
SWX leads the current stock comparison as Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Spire Inc. vs Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
SWX leads
SWX leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support SWX, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Spire Inc.
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SWX over SR, 58 versus 56 as of Oct 31, 2026. SWX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while SR holds the stronger value profile. SWX also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SWX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. SWX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Spire Inc. and Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SR and SWX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality36 vs 56SWX +20
- Value58 vs 42SR +16
- Risk Resilience50 vs 59SWX +9
- Momentum81 vs 80Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor SWX. SWX’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; SR keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
SWX's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SR and SWX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SWX (Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
SR (Spire Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SWXSWX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SRSR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SRSR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
SWXSWX on Risk Resilience, by 9 points.
Analyst upside
SWXSWX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SR | SWX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +6.7% | +8.7% | SWX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +25.6% | +10.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 5 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | SR | SWX |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 4.78% | 1.92% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $2.518 | $2.255 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $3.180 | $2.480 |
| Years increased | 5 | 3 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #260 | #335 |
SR grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 4.78% a year against SWX's 1.92%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SWX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 56 vs 58 |
| Fundamentals | SWXon balance | revenue growth -58.8% vs -38.8%; EPS growth -22.6% vs -69.6%; TTM ROE 21.4% vs 12.9%; gross margin 32.7% vs 56.6%; operating margin 19.7% vs 28.7% — SWX takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SR | Value 58 vs 42 |
| Technicals | SWX | Price vs 50-day 8.8% vs 7.2%; vs 200-day 1.1% vs 4.9% |
| Risk Resilience | SWX | Risk Resilience 50 vs 59 |
| Analyst expectations | SWX | Target upside 6.7% vs 8.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SR and SWX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SWX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28SWX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SWX +2
- 56 vs 58
- 7 sessions ago
- SWX +3
- 56 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- SWX +2
- 43 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- SR +4
- 52 vs 48
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Oct 20 when SWX moved ahead of SR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
4 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only SWX
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.9%)
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, Keltner Channel Breakout, RSI Overbought, MACD Bullish Crossover.
SWX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.48%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.04%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SR closes the Quality gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to SWX's edge.
- 2SR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SWX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SWX leads on balance| Metric | SR | SWX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -58.8% | -38.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -22.6% | -69.6% |
| Gross margin | 32.7% | 56.6% |
| Operating margin | 19.7% | 28.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 21.4% | 12.9% |
| Debt to equity | 2.03 | 0.85 |
Performance
SWX leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | SR | SWX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.6% | 4.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 12.2% | 12% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 6.2% | 2.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -4.7% | 0.6% |
| Year to date | 3.4% | 15.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -3.8% | 12.8% |
Technicals
SWX has the stronger structure| Metric | SR | SWX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 80.7 | 80 |
| ADX (14) | 35.1 | 34 |
| Price vs 50-day | 8.8% | 7.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.1% | 4.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 17.8% | 18.6% |
Risk
SWX is the more resilient| Metric | SR | SWX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.23 | -0.12 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.26 | 0.63 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.41 | 1.03 |
| Max drawdown | -20.2% | -13.5% |
| Current drawdown | -10.2% | -1.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 19.6% | 18.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.1% | -1.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SR or SWX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SWX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 58 against SR's 56. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. SR is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SR or SWX the better buy right now?
SWX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SWX over SR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SWX leads Quality by 20 points; SR leads Value by 16 points; SWX leads Risk Resilience by 9 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SR or SWX?
Analyst price targets imply +6.7% upside for SR and +8.7% for SWX, so the Street currently favors SWX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SR or SWX?
SR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SR or SWX?
SR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SR or SWX?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SR or SWX?
SWX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SWX on Risk Resilience, by 9 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SR more profitable than SWX?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 32.7% vs 56.6%; operating margin 19.7% vs 28.7%; ttm roe 21.4% vs 12.9%. SR leads on one measure and SWX on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SWX's lead over SR getting stronger or weaker?
SWX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-20, when SWX moved ahead of SR.
What would change the SR vs SWX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SR closes the Quality gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to SWX's edge; SR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SWX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SR and SWX?
SR: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. SWX: 4 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SWX it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare SR and SWX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.