SR vs UGI Stock Comparison
UGI currently leads SR in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 62 vs 56. The clearest difference is risk resilience, while SR has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between SR and UGI?
UGI leads the current stock comparison as UGI Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Spire Inc. vs UGI Corporation
UGI leads
UGI leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 10 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support UGI, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Spire Inc.
UGI Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors UGI over SR, 62 versus 56 as of Oct 31, 2026. UGI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality, while SR holds the stronger momentum profile. UGI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor UGI today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. UGI lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Spire Inc. and UGI Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SR and UGI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience50 vs 66UGI +16
- Quality36 vs 45UGI +9
- Value58 vs 67UGI +9
- Momentum81 vs 74SR +7
4 of 6 evidence groups favor UGI. UGI’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality; SR keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
UGI's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SR and UGI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
UGI (UGI Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
SR (Spire Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
UGIUGI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SRSR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
UGIUGI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points.
Momentum
SRSR on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.
Lower downside
UGIUGI on Risk Resilience, by 16 points.
Analyst upside
UGIUGI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SR | UGI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +6.7% | +16.4% | UGI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +25.6% | +6.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | SR | UGI |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 4.78% | 2.67% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $2.518 | $1.315 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $3.180 | $1.500 |
| Years increased | 5 | 4 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #260 | #311 |
SR grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 4.78% a year against UGI's 2.67%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor UGI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | UGI | 56 vs 62 |
| Fundamentals | SRon balance | revenue growth -58.8% vs -50.4%; EPS growth -22.6% vs -125.6%; TTM ROE 21.4% vs 13.2%; gross margin 32.7% vs 46.7%; operating margin 19.7% vs 14% — SR takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | UGI | Value 58 vs 67 |
| Technicals | SR | Price vs 50-day 8.8% vs 2.5%; vs 200-day 1.1% vs 4.8% |
| Risk Resilience | UGI | Risk Resilience 50 vs 66 |
| Analyst expectations | UGI | Target upside 6.7% vs 16.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SR and UGI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on UGI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28UGI lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- UGI +6
- 56 vs 62
- 7 sessions ago
- UGI +7
- 56 vs 63
- 30 sessions ago
- UGI +10
- 43 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- UGI +10
- 52 vs 62
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only SR
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (4.55%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only UGI
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.85%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
SR is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.48%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.29%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SR closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to UGI's edge.
- 2SR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3UGI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate UGI's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SR leads on balance| Metric | SR | UGI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -58.8% | -50.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -22.6% | -125.6% |
| Gross margin | 32.7% | 46.7% |
| Operating margin | 19.7% | 14% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 21.4% | 13.2% |
| Debt to equity | 2.03 | 1.29 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | SR | UGI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.6% | -0.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 12.2% | 7.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 6.2% | 6.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -4.7% | 2.3% |
| Year to date | 3.4% | 2.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -3.8% | 14% |
Technicals
SR has the stronger structure| Metric | SR | UGI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 80.7 | 64.7 |
| ADX (14) | 35.1 | 16.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 8.8% | 2.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.1% | 4.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 17.8% | 20.4% |
Risk
UGI is the more resilient| Metric | SR | UGI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.23 | -0.02 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.26 | 0.51 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.41 | 0.7 |
| Max drawdown | -20.2% | -20.4% |
| Current drawdown | -10.2% | -5.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 19.6% | 24.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.1% | -1.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SR or UGI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, UGI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 62 against SR's 56. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. SR is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SR or UGI the better buy right now?
UGI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor UGI over SR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. UGI leads Risk Resilience by 16 points; UGI leads Quality by 9 points; UGI leads Value by 9 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SR or UGI?
Analyst price targets imply +6.7% upside for SR and +16.4% for UGI, so the Street currently favors UGI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SR or UGI?
UGI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. UGI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SR or UGI?
SR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SR or UGI?
SR on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SR or UGI?
UGI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. UGI on Risk Resilience, by 16 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SR more profitable than UGI?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 32.7% vs 46.7%; operating margin 19.7% vs 14%; ttm roe 21.4% vs 13.2%. SR leads on two measures and UGI on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is UGI's lead over SR getting stronger or weaker?
UGI lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the SR vs UGI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SR closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to UGI's edge; SR's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; UGI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate UGI's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about SR and UGI?
SR: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. UGI: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SR is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On UGI it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare SR and UGI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.