STLD vs TECK Stock Comparison
Compare STLD and TECK across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between STLD and TECK?
STLD leads the current stock comparison as Steel Dynamics, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Steel Dynamics, Inc. vs Teck Resources Limited
STLD leads
STLD leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from TECK.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support STLD, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
Teck Resources Limited
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors STLD over TECK, 56 versus 52 as of Sep 11, 2026. STLD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum. STLD also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor STLD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. STLD lead: Reversed — TECK led by 12 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; STLD now leads by 4.
Compare Steel Dynamics, Inc. and Teck Resources Limited across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare STLD and TECK against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value58 vs 48STLD +10
- Momentum66 vs 60STLD +6
- Quality48 vs 50Even
- Risk Resilience52 vs 52Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor STLD. STLD’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -12
New signals
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.83%)
The lead changed hands: STLD moved ahead of TECK in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — STLD and TECK both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
STLD (Steel Dynamics, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
TECK (Teck Resources Limited): the counter-case, on technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
STLDSTLD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
STLDSTLD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
STLDSTLD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
STLDSTLD on the Momentum factor, by 6 points.
Lower downside
TECKTECK carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
STLDSTLD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | STLD | TECK | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +10% | -2.2% | STLD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +41.7% | +9.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor STLD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | STLD | 56 vs 52 |
| Fundamentals | STLDon balance | revenue growth 17% vs -8.5%; EPS growth 32.6% vs 4.8%; TTM ROE 17.6% vs 9.6%; gross margin 14.6% vs 34.9%; operating margin 10.6% vs 29.3% — STLD takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | STLD | Value 58 vs 48 |
| Technicals | TECK | Price vs 50-day -1% vs 4.8%; vs 200-day 12% vs 15.5% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 52 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | STLD | Target upside 10% vs -2.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of STLD and TECK and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on STLD.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10STLD lead: Reversed — TECK led by 12 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; STLD now leads by 4.
- Today
- STLD +4
- 56 vs 52
- 7 sessions ago
- TECK +3
- 53 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- TECK +12
- 43 vs 55
- 90 sessions ago
- TECK +3
- 41 vs 44
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Sep 10 when STLD moved ahead of TECK.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (14.44%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.53%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (11.07%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
TECK is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.14%, AIQ +2 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.82%, AIQ -4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TECK closes the Value gap — currently 10 points behind, the largest single contributor to STLD's edge.
- 2TECK generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3STLD's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
STLD leads on balance| Metric | STLD | TECK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 17% | -8.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 32.6% | 4.8% |
| Gross margin | 14.6% | 34.9% |
| Operating margin | 10.6% | 29.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.6% | 9.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.44 | 0.35 |
Performance
TECK leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | STLD | TECK |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.3% | -1.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -9.9% | -0.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -11.1% | 10% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 28.7% | 23.7% |
| Year to date | 39.9% | 37.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 76.2% | 87.7% |
Technicals
TECK has the stronger structure| Metric | STLD | TECK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 69.4 | 49.4 |
| ADX (14) | 13.2 | 16.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1% | 4.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 12% | 15.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 46.1% | 42.4% |
Risk
Split| Metric | STLD | TECK |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.17 | 2.18 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.72 | 1.27 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.71 | 2.12 |
| Max drawdown | -22.6% | -26.2% |
| Current drawdown | -16.2% | -8.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 36.6% | 46.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.3% | -4.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, STLD or TECK?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, STLD is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 56 against TECK's 52. The edge comes from value and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is STLD or TECK the better buy right now?
STLD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor STLD over TECK?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. STLD leads Value by 10 points; STLD leads Momentum by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, STLD or TECK?
Analyst price targets imply +10% upside for STLD and -2.2% for TECK, so the Street currently favors STLD. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, STLD or TECK?
STLD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. STLD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, STLD or TECK?
STLD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, STLD or TECK?
STLD on the Momentum factor, by 6 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, STLD or TECK?
TECK is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TECK carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is STLD more profitable than TECK?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 14.6% vs 34.9%; operating margin 10.6% vs 29.3%; ttm roe 17.6% vs 9.6%. STLD leads on one measure and TECK on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is STLD's lead over TECK getting stronger or weaker?
STLD lead: Reversed — TECK led by 12 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; STLD now leads by 4. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-10, when STLD moved ahead of TECK.
What would change the STLD vs TECK verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TECK closes the Value gap — currently 10 points behind, the largest single contributor to STLD's edge; TECK generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover; STLD's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about STLD and TECK?
STLD: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. TECK: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on STLD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TECK it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare STLD and TECK with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.