SYK vs TFX Stock Comparison
Compare SYK and TFX across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between SYK and TFX?
TFX leads the current stock comparison as Teleflex Incorporated, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Stryker Corporation vs Teleflex Incorporated
TFX leads
TFX leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, and the lead has widened from 4 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors SYK on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support TFX, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Stryker Corporation
Teleflex Incorporated
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TFX over SYK, 50 versus 43 as of Sep 11, 2026. TFX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while SYK holds the stronger quality profile. TFX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors SYK. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TFX today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. TFX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Stryker Corporation and Teleflex Incorporated across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare SYK and TFX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum8 vs 41TFX +33
- Quality66 vs 39SYK +27
- Value42 vs 62TFX +20
- Risk Resilience55 vs 64TFX +9
4 of 6 evidence groups favor TFX. TFX’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; SYK keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -19
No new signals fired.
TFX's lead narrowed by 5 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SYK and TFX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TFX (Teleflex Incorporated): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
SYK (Stryker Corporation): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 38% against 25.4%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TFXTFX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SYKSYK on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TFXTFX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
TFXTFX on the Momentum factor, by 33 points.
Lower downside
TFXTFX on Risk Resilience, by 9 points.
Analyst upside
SYKSYK on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors TFX, analyst targets favor SYK. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | SYK | TFX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +36.1% | +16.2% | SYK has more room |
| Target dispersion | +28% | +27.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 16 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TFX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TFX | 43 vs 50 |
| Fundamentals | SYK | revenue growth 9.5% vs 4%; EPS growth 70.3% vs 13.7%; TTM ROE 16.4% vs -31.8%; gross margin 65.2% vs 53.8%; operating margin 22% vs 3.3% |
| Valuation | TFX | Value 42 vs 62 |
| Technicals | TFX | Price vs 50-day -15.4% vs -3.4%; vs 200-day -19.9% vs 6.8% |
| Risk Resilience | TFX | Risk Resilience 55 vs 64 |
| Analyst expectations | SYK | Target upside 36.1% vs 16.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SYK and TFX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TFX.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10TFX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TFX +7
- 43 vs 50
- 7 sessions ago
- TFX +13
- 45 vs 58
- 30 sessions ago
- TFX +4
- 52 vs 56
- 90 sessions ago
- SYK +1
- 58 vs 57
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Aug 13 when TFX moved ahead of SYK.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.49%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (9.73%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
TFX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.06%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.77%, AIQ -5 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SYK closes the Momentum gap — currently 33 points behind, the largest single contributor to TFX's edge.
- 2SYK's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3TFX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SYK leads on balance| Metric | SYK | TFX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.5% | 4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 70.3% | 13.7% |
| Gross margin | 65.2% | 53.8% |
| Operating margin | 22% | 3.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 16.4% | -31.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.62 | 0.99 |
Performance
TFX leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | SYK | TFX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -11.5% | -6.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -18.8% | -3.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -12.6% | -0.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -21.9% | 18.1% |
| Year to date | -19.5% | 8.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -30.5% | 2.6% |
Technicals
TFX has the stronger structure| Metric | SYK | TFX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 15.6 | 43.9 |
| ADX (14) | 21.8 | 12.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -15.4% | -3.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -19.9% | 6.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 38% | 25.4% |
Risk
TFX is the more resilient| Metric | SYK | TFX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.15 | 0.76 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.26 | 0.14 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.73 | 0.19 |
| Max drawdown | -31.3% | -24.6% |
| Current drawdown | -31.3% | -7.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 29.5% | 40.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3% | -3.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SYK or TFX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TFX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 50 against SYK's 43. The edge comes from momentum and value. SYK is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SYK or TFX the better buy right now?
TFX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TFX over SYK?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TFX leads Momentum by 33 points; SYK leads Quality by 27 points; TFX leads Value by 20 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SYK or TFX?
Analyst price targets imply +36.1% upside for SYK and +16.2% for TFX, so the Street currently favors SYK. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors TFX. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SYK or TFX?
TFX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TFX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SYK or TFX?
SYK on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SYK or TFX?
TFX on the Momentum factor, by 33 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SYK or TFX?
TFX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TFX on Risk Resilience, by 9 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SYK more profitable than TFX?
SYK leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 65.2% vs 53.8%; operating margin 22% vs 3.3%; ttm roe 16.4% vs -31.8%.
Is TFX's lead over SYK getting stronger or weaker?
TFX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 7 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-13, when TFX moved ahead of SYK.
What would change the SYK vs TFX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SYK closes the Momentum gap — currently 33 points behind, the largest single contributor to TFX's edge; SYK's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; TFX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SYK and TFX?
SYK: 2 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. TFX: 2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SYK is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On TFX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare SYK and TFX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.