SYY vs USFD Stock Comparison
Compare SYY and USFD across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between SYY and USFD?
SYY leads the current stock comparison as Sysco Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Sysco Corporation vs US Foods Holding Corp.
SYY leads
SYY leads by 11 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 1 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors USFD on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support SYY, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Sysco Corporation
US Foods Holding Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SYY over USFD, 51 versus 40 as of Sep 11, 2026. SYY's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality. SYY also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors USFD. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SYY today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. SYY lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 11 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Sysco Corporation and US Foods Holding Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare SYY and USFD against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum45 vs 26SYY +19
- Quality48 vs 36SYY +12
- Value57 vs 47SYY +10
- Risk Resilience58 vs 56Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor SYY. SYY’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No new signals fired.
SYY's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SYY and USFD both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SYY (Sysco Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
USFD (US Foods Holding Corp.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 23.5% against 15.8%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SYYSYY on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
USFDUSFD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SYYSYY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
SYYSYY on the Momentum factor, by 19 points.
Lower downside
SYYSYY carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
USFDUSFD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SYY, analyst targets favor USFD. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | SYY | USFD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +1.3% | +16.3% | USFD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +1.2% | +35.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SYY. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SYY | 51 vs 40 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 7.8% vs 9.6%; EPS growth 63.4% vs 137.7%; TTM ROE 75.5% vs 16.7%; gross margin 18.5% vs 17.6%; operating margin 3.7% vs 3.2% |
| Valuation | SYY | Value 57 vs 47 |
| Technicals | SYY | Price vs 50-day 0.3% vs -7.6%; vs 200-day 3.6% vs 5.8% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 58 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | USFD | Target upside 1.3% vs 16.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SYY and USFD and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 11 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SYY.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SYY lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 11 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SYY +11
- 51 vs 40
- 7 sessions ago
- SYY +5
- 50 vs 45
- 30 sessions ago
- SYY +1
- 53 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- SYY +6
- 60 vs 54
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Aug 19 when SYY moved ahead of USFD.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (4.39%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
3 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (13.68%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
SYY leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.09%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.75%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1USFD closes the Momentum gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to SYY's edge.
- 2USFD's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3SYY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | SYY | USFD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 7.8% | 9.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 63.4% | 137.7% |
| Gross margin | 18.5% | 17.6% |
| Operating margin | 3.7% | 3.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 75.5% | 16.7% |
| Debt to equity | 5.61 | 1.22 |
Performance
USFD leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | SYY | USFD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.7% | -8.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -2.8% | -12.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 4.8% | 6.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -2.7% | 5.2% |
| Year to date | 11.7% | 27.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 0.9% | 22.7% |
Technicals
SYY has the stronger structure| Metric | SYY | USFD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 46.2 | 16.2 |
| ADX (14) | 13 | 21.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.3% | -7.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 3.6% | 5.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 15.8% | 23.5% |
Risk
Split| Metric | SYY | USFD |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.12 | 0.17 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.06 | 0.71 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.07 | 1.3 |
| Max drawdown | -24% | -21.1% |
| Current drawdown | -9.7% | -13.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 26.9% | 30% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SYY or USFD?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SYY is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 51 against USFD's 40. The edge comes from momentum and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SYY or USFD the better buy right now?
SYY carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SYY over USFD?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SYY leads Momentum by 19 points; SYY leads Quality by 12 points; SYY leads Value by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SYY or USFD?
Analyst price targets imply +1.3% upside for SYY and +16.3% for USFD, so the Street currently favors USFD. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SYY. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SYY or USFD?
SYY is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SYY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SYY or USFD?
USFD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SYY or USFD?
SYY on the Momentum factor, by 19 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SYY or USFD?
SYY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SYY carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SYY more profitable than USFD?
SYY leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 18.5% vs 17.6%; operating margin 3.7% vs 3.2%; ttm roe 75.5% vs 16.7%.
Is SYY's lead over USFD getting stronger or weaker?
SYY lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 11 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-19, when SYY moved ahead of USFD.
What would change the SYY vs USFD verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: USFD closes the Momentum gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to SYY's edge; USFD's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; SYY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SYY and USFD?
SYY: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. USFD: 3 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SYY is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On USFD it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare SYY and USFD with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.