TECK vs TROX Stock Comparison
Compare TECK and TROX across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between TECK and TROX?
TECK leads the current stock comparison as Teck Resources Limited, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Teck Resources Limited vs Tronox Holdings plc
TECK leads
TECK leads by 18 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum. Wall Street currently favors TROX on target upside.
Competitive: 3 of 6 evidence groups support TECK, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Teck Resources Limited
Tronox Holdings plc
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TECK over TROX, 52 versus 34 as of Sep 11, 2026. TECK's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while TROX holds the stronger value profile. TECK also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors TROX. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TECK today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. TECK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 18 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Teck Resources Limited and Tronox Holdings plc across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare TECK and TROX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality50 vs 2TECK +48
- Momentum60 vs 25TECK +35
- Value48 vs 65TROX +17
- Risk Resilience52 vs 49Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor TECK. TECK’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; TROX keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -12
New signals
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.83%)
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +2
No new signals fired.
TECK's lead narrowed by 5 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — TECK and TROX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TECK (Teck Resources Limited): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
TROX (Tronox Holdings plc): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TECKTECK on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TECKTECK on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TROXTROX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points.
Momentum
TECKTECK on the Momentum factor, by 35 points.
Lower downside
TROXTROX carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
TROXTROX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors TECK, analyst targets favor TROX. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | TECK | TROX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -2.2% | +85.7% | TROX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +9.2% | +60.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TECK. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TECK | 52 vs 34 |
| Fundamentals | TECKon balance | revenue growth -8.5% vs 14.2%; EPS growth 4.8% vs -64.6%; TTM ROE 9.6% vs -40.4%; gross margin 34.9% vs 5.3%; operating margin 29.3% vs -3.5% — TECK takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TROX | Value 48 vs 65 |
| Technicals | TECK | Price vs 50-day 4.8% vs -24.2%; vs 200-day 15.5% vs -30.9% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 52 vs 49 |
| Analyst expectations | TROX | Target upside -2.2% vs 85.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of TECK and TROX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 18 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TECK.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10TECK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 18 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TECK +18
- 52 vs 34
- 7 sessions ago
- TECK +23
- 56 vs 33
- 30 sessions ago
- TECK +19
- 55 vs 36
- 90 sessions ago
- TECK +11
- 44 vs 33
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (11.07%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (15.97%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
TECK leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.82%, AIQ -4 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -3.7%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TROX closes the Quality gap — currently 48 points behind, the largest single contributor to TECK's edge.
- 2TROX's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3TECK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TECK leads on balance| Metric | TECK | TROX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -8.5% | 14.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 4.8% | -64.6% |
| Gross margin | 34.9% | 5.3% |
| Operating margin | 29.3% | -3.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 9.6% | -40.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.35 | 2.9 |
Performance
TECK leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | TECK | TROX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.7% | -10.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.1% | -25.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 10% | -35.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 23.7% | -31.8% |
| Year to date | 37.6% | 10.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 87.7% | 2.8% |
Technicals
TECK has the stronger structure| Metric | TECK | TROX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 49.4 | 15.2 |
| ADX (14) | 16.6 | 34.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | 4.8% | -24.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 15.5% | -30.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 42.4% | 39.4% |
Risk
Split| Metric | TECK | TROX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.18 | 2.02 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.27 | 0.28 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.12 | 0.57 |
| Max drawdown | -26.2% | -56.2% |
| Current drawdown | -8.4% | -56.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 46.7% | 78.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.3% | -6.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, TECK or TROX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TECK is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 52 against TROX's 34. The edge comes from quality and momentum. TROX is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is TECK or TROX the better buy right now?
TECK carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TECK over TROX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TECK leads Quality by 48 points; TECK leads Momentum by 35 points; TROX leads Value by 17 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, TECK or TROX?
Analyst price targets imply -2.2% upside for TECK and +85.7% for TROX, so the Street currently favors TROX. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors TECK. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, TECK or TROX?
TROX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TROX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, TECK or TROX?
TECK on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, TECK or TROX?
TECK on the Momentum factor, by 35 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, TECK or TROX?
TROX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TROX carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is TECK more profitable than TROX?
TECK leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 34.9% vs 5.3%; operating margin 29.3% vs -3.5%; ttm roe 9.6% vs -40.4%.
Is TECK's lead over TROX getting stronger or weaker?
TECK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 18 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the TECK vs TROX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TROX closes the Quality gap — currently 48 points behind, the largest single contributor to TECK's edge; TROX's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; TECK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about TECK and TROX?
TECK: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. TROX: 1 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on TECK is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TROX it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare TECK and TROX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.