TMUS vs VOD Stock Comparison
Compare TMUS and VOD across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between TMUS and VOD?
VOD leads the current stock comparison as Vodafone Group Public Limited Company, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
T-Mobile US, Inc. vs Vodafone Group Public Limited Company
VOD leads
VOD leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, and the lead has widened from 1 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors TMUS on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support VOD, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Vodafone Group Public Limited Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors VOD over TMUS, 55 versus 42 as of Sep 11, 2026. VOD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while TMUS holds the stronger quality profile. VOD also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors TMUS. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor VOD today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. VOD lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
Compare T-Mobile US, Inc. and Vodafone Group Public Limited Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare TMUS and VOD against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum35 vs 79VOD +44
- Value46 vs 63VOD +17
- Quality43 vs 29TMUS +14
- Risk Resilience42 vs 52VOD +10
4 of 6 evidence groups favor VOD. VOD’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; TMUS keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
VOD's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — TMUS and VOD both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
VOD (Vodafone Group Public Limited Company): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 26.2% against 19.3%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
VODVOD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TMUSTMUS on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
VODVOD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points.
Momentum
VODVOD on the Momentum factor, by 44 points.
Lower downside
VODVOD on Risk Resilience, by 10 points.
Analyst upside
TMUSTMUS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors VOD, analyst targets favor TMUS. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | TMUS | VOD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +29.6% | +20.3% | TMUS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +49.1% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Sell | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor VOD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | VOD | 42 vs 55 |
| Fundamentals | TMUSon balance | revenue growth -1.4% vs 7.8%; EPS growth 31.1% vs -260.4%; gross margin 54.5% vs 31.5%; operating margin 20.3% vs 8.6% — TMUS takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | VOD | Value 46 vs 63 |
| Technicals | VOD | Price vs 50-day 0.4% vs 11.5%; vs 200-day -8.7% vs 17.4% |
| Risk Resilience | VOD | Risk Resilience 42 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | TMUS | Target upside 29.6% vs 20.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of TMUS and VOD and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on VOD.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10VOD lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- VOD +13
- 42 vs 55
- 7 sessions ago
- VOD +7
- 48 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- VOD +1
- 49 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- TMUS +1
- 42 vs 41
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Jul 13 when VOD moved ahead of TMUS.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 3 bearish
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (6.85%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
6 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (5.72%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
VOD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.92%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.4%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TMUS closes the Momentum gap — currently 44 points behind, the largest single contributor to VOD's edge.
- 2TMUS's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3VOD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 6 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TMUS leads on balance| Metric | TMUS | VOD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -1.4% | 7.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 31.1% | -260.4% |
| Gross margin | 54.5% | 31.5% |
| Operating margin | 20.3% | 8.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 18.2% | -0.8% |
| Debt to equity | 2.06 | 1.04 |
Performance
VOD leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | TMUS | VOD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.4% | 7.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0% | 7.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4.5% | 15.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -17% | 20.3% |
| Year to date | -12.7% | 31% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -27.1% | 46.9% |
Technicals
VOD has the stronger structure| Metric | TMUS | VOD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 43.3 | 78.9 |
| ADX (14) | 10.2 | 22.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.4% | 11.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -8.7% | 17.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 26.2% | 19.3% |
Risk
VOD is the more resilient| Metric | TMUS | VOD |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.32 | 0.5 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.06 | 1.25 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.46 | 1.86 |
| Max drawdown | -30.9% | -20.3% |
| Current drawdown | -27% | 0% |
| Annualized volatility | 29.3% | 31.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3% | -2.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, TMUS or VOD?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, VOD is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 55 against TMUS's 42. The edge comes from momentum and value. TMUS is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is TMUS or VOD the better buy right now?
VOD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor VOD over TMUS?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. VOD leads Momentum by 44 points; VOD leads Value by 17 points; TMUS leads Quality by 14 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, TMUS or VOD?
Analyst price targets imply +29.6% upside for TMUS and +20.3% for VOD, so the Street currently favors TMUS. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors VOD. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, TMUS or VOD?
VOD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. VOD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, TMUS or VOD?
TMUS on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, TMUS or VOD?
VOD on the Momentum factor, by 44 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, TMUS or VOD?
VOD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. VOD on Risk Resilience, by 10 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is TMUS more profitable than VOD?
TMUS leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 54.5% vs 31.5%; operating margin 20.3% vs 8.6%; ttm roe 18.2% vs -0.8%.
Is VOD's lead over TMUS getting stronger or weaker?
VOD lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 13 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-13, when VOD moved ahead of TMUS.
What would change the TMUS vs VOD verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TMUS closes the Momentum gap — currently 44 points behind, the largest single contributor to VOD's edge; TMUS's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; VOD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 6 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about TMUS and VOD?
TMUS: 0 bullish / 3 bearish. VOD: 6 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on TMUS is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On VOD it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare TMUS and VOD with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.