TRMB vs TYL Stock Comparison
Trimble Inc. vs Tyler Technologies, Inc.
TRMB and TYL are effectively level
TRMB and TYL are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Trimble Inc.
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate TRMB and TYL as of Sep 5, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Compare Trimble Inc. and Tyler Technologies, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare TRMB and TYL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25%67 vs 89TYL +22
- Value30%67 vs 49TRMB +18
- Quality30%56 vs 53Even
- Risk Resilience15%52 vs 53Even
Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-04, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-03.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No new signals fired.
TYL's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — TRMB and TYL both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EvenNeither separates on the overall score.
Growth
TYLTYL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TRMBTRMB on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points.
Momentum
TYLTYL on the Momentum factor, by 22 points.
Lower downside
TRMBTRMB carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
TRMBTRMB on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | TRMB | TYL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +23.6% | +12.5% | TRMB has more room |
| Target dispersion | +25.9% | +28.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 61 vs 61 |
| Fundamentals | TYLon balance | revenue growth 3.4% vs 5.1%; EPS growth -5.8% vs 18.4%; TTM ROE -1.9% vs 9.3%; gross margin 68.4% vs 46.6%; operating margin 17.5% vs 15.1% — TYL takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TRMB | Value 67 vs 49 |
| Technicals | TYL | Price vs 50-day 6.1% vs 11.9%; vs 200-day -8.2% vs 1.8% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 52 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | TRMB | Target upside 23.6% vs 12.5% |
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 23 – Sep 4TRMB lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 0 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- Level
- 61 vs 61
- 7 sessions ago
- Level
- 63 vs 63
- 30 sessions ago
- TRMB +6
- 63 vs 57
- 90 sessions ago
- TRMB +9
- 61 vs 52
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Aug 27 when TYL moved ahead of TRMB.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (15.61%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (9.94%)
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.87%)
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.05%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -4.02%, AIQ -1 points).
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TYL leads on balance| Metric | TRMB | TYL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.4% | 5.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -5.8% | 18.4% |
| Gross margin | 68.4% | 46.6% |
| Operating margin | 17.5% | 15.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -1.9% | 9.3% |
| Debt to equity | 0.29 | 0.48 |
Performance
TYL leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | TRMB | TYL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.5% | -3.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.1% | 16.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 9.7% | 16.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -15.1% | -2.8% |
| Year to date | -24.1% | -19.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -24.3% | -34.3% |
Technicals
TYL has the stronger structure| Metric | TRMB | TYL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 64.9 | 71.8 |
| ADX (14) | 24.1 | 34 |
| Price vs 50-day | 6.1% | 11.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | -8.2% | 1.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 31.5% | 37% |
Risk
Split| Metric | TRMB | TYL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.13 | 0.06 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.88 | -0.92 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.22 | -1.18 |
| Max drawdown | -41.5% | -51.4% |
| Current drawdown | -28.8% | -35.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 32% | 40.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.5% | -4.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which has more analyst upside, TRMB or TYL?
Analyst price targets imply +23.6% upside for TRMB and +12.5% for TYL, so the Street currently favors TRMB. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, TRMB or TYL?
TRMB is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TRMB on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, TRMB or TYL?
TYL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, TRMB or TYL?
TYL on the Momentum factor, by 22 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, TRMB or TYL?
TRMB is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TRMB carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is TRMB more profitable than TYL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 68.4% vs 46.6%; operating margin 17.5% vs 15.1%; ttm roe -1.9% vs 9.3%. TRMB leads on two measures and TYL on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
What do the current signals say about TRMB and TYL?
TRMB: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral. TYL: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on TRMB is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On TYL it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare TRMB and TYL with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.