TRMB vs VRSN Stock Comparison
TRMB currently leads VRSN in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 64 vs 58. The clearest difference is value, while VRSN has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between TRMB and VRSN?
TRMB leads the current stock comparison as Trimble Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Trimble Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
TRMB leads
TRMB leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Value, but the lead has narrowed from 10 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support TRMB, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Trimble Inc.
VeriSign, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TRMB over VRSN, 64 versus 58 as of Oct 21, 2026. TRMB's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while VRSN holds the stronger quality profile. TRMB also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TRMB today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. TRMB lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Trimble Inc. and VeriSign, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare TRMB and VRSN against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value67 vs 40TRMB +27
- Quality56 vs 60VRSN +4
- Momentum78 vs 82VRSN +4
- Risk Resilience54 vs 52Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor TRMB. TRMB’s edge is concentrated in value; VRSN keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +13
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
TRMB's lead widened by 3 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — TRMB and VRSN both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TRMB (Trimble Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
VRSN (VeriSign, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, momentum, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TRMBTRMB on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
VRSNVRSN on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TRMBTRMB on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points.
Momentum
VRSNVRSN on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
VRSNVRSN carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
TRMBTRMB on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | TRMB | VRSN | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +17.4% | +10.7% | TRMB has more room |
| Target dispersion | +25.9% | +9.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TRMB. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TRMB | 64 vs 58 |
| Fundamentals | VRSNon balance | revenue growth 3.4% vs 1.3%; EPS growth -5.8% vs 1.7%; TTM ROE -1.9% vs -39.2%; gross margin 68.4% vs 88.5%; operating margin 17.5% vs 67.9% — VRSN takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TRMB | Value 67 vs 40 |
| Technicals | VRSN | Price vs 50-day 6.4% vs 5.3%; vs 200-day -1.4% vs 13.8% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 54 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | TRMB | Target upside 17.4% vs 10.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of TRMB and VRSN and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TRMB.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20TRMB lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TRMB +6
- 64 vs 58
- 7 sessions ago
- TRMB +5
- 63 vs 58
- 30 sessions ago
- TRMB +10
- 56 vs 46
- 90 sessions ago
- TRMB +13
- 58 vs 45
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Sep 22 when TRMB moved ahead of VRSN.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only TRMB
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (4.51%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only VRSN
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (8.41%)
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.2%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
TRMB leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.76%, AIQ +3 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.23%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1VRSN closes the Value gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to TRMB's edge.
- 2VRSN's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3TRMB's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate TRMB's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
VRSN leads on balance| Metric | TRMB | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.4% | 1.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -5.8% | 1.7% |
| Gross margin | 68.4% | 88.5% |
| Operating margin | 17.5% | 67.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -1.9% | -39.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.29 | -1.04 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | TRMB | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.5% | 1.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 4.8% | 2.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 17.8% | 16.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -9.9% | 13.6% |
| Year to date | -20.7% | 26.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -20.6% | 16.6% |
Technicals
VRSN has the stronger structure| Metric | TRMB | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 68.9 | 85.5 |
| ADX (14) | 22.2 | 16.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 6.4% | 5.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -1.4% | 13.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 28.7% | 18.3% |
Risk
Split| Metric | TRMB | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.1 | 0.01 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.65 | 0.52 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.91 | 0.69 |
| Max drawdown | -41.5% | -20.8% |
| Current drawdown | -25.6% | -1.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 32.1% | 29.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.4% | -3.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, TRMB or VRSN?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TRMB is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 64 against VRSN's 58. The edge comes from value. VRSN is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is TRMB or VRSN the better buy right now?
TRMB carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TRMB over VRSN?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TRMB leads Value by 27 points; VRSN leads Quality by 4 points; VRSN leads Momentum by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, TRMB or VRSN?
Analyst price targets imply +17.4% upside for TRMB and +10.7% for VRSN, so the Street currently favors TRMB. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, TRMB or VRSN?
TRMB is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TRMB on the peer-relative Value factor, by 27 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, TRMB or VRSN?
VRSN on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, TRMB or VRSN?
VRSN on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, TRMB or VRSN?
VRSN is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. VRSN carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is TRMB more profitable than VRSN?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 68.4% vs 88.5%; operating margin 17.5% vs 67.9%; ttm roe -1.9% vs -39.2%. TRMB leads on one measure and VRSN on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is TRMB's lead over VRSN getting stronger or weaker?
TRMB lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-22, when TRMB moved ahead of VRSN.
What would change the TRMB vs VRSN verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: VRSN closes the Value gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to TRMB's edge; VRSN's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; TRMB's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate TRMB's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about TRMB and VRSN?
TRMB: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. VRSN: 5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on TRMB is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On VRSN it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare TRMB and VRSN with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.