TU vs VOD Stock Comparison
VOD currently leads TU in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 46 vs 40. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between TU and VOD?
VOD leads the current stock comparison as Vodafone Group Public Limited Company, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Telus Corp vs Vodafone Group Public Limited Company
VOD leads
VOD leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 10 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support VOD, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Telus Corp
Vodafone Group Public Limited Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors VOD over TU, 46 versus 40 as of Oct 21, 2026. VOD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value. VOD also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor VOD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. VOD lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Telus Corp and Vodafone Group Public Limited Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare TU and VOD against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality17 vs 29VOD +12
- Value59 vs 63VOD +4
- Momentum43 vs 45Even
- Risk Resilience45 vs 47Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor VOD. VOD’s edge is concentrated in quality and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
VOD's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — TU and VOD both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
VOD (Vodafone Group Public Limited Company): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
TU (Telus Corp): the counter-case, on fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
VODVOD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TUTU on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
VODVOD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
VODVOD carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | TU | VOD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +31.3% | +32.1% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +18.2% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | TU | VOD |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 8.69% | -11.99% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.783 | $1.007 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $1.187 | $0.532 |
| Years increased | 5 | 2 |
| No cut in window | Yes | No (3) |
| Cohort rank | #128 | not ranked |
TU grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 8.69% a year against VOD's -11.99%. TU never reduced its regular dividend in the window; VOD did in 3 years.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor VOD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | VOD | 40 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | TUon balance | revenue growth -1.4% vs 7.8%; EPS growth -14.4% vs -260.4%; gross margin 38.9% vs 31.5%; operating margin 14.8% vs 8.6% — TU takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | VOD | Value 59 vs 63 |
| Technicals | VOD | Price vs 50-day -6.5% vs -3.4%; vs 200-day -26.6% vs 3.8% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 45 vs 47 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 31.3% vs 32.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of TU and VOD and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on VOD.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20VOD lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- VOD +6
- 40 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- VOD +5
- 39 vs 44
- 30 sessions ago
- VOD +10
- 37 vs 47
- 90 sessions ago
- VOD +14
- 35 vs 49
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only TU
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (28.58%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only VOD
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.27%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze.
VOD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.95%, AIQ -1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.19%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TU closes the Quality gap — currently 12 points behind, the largest single contributor to VOD's edge.
- 2TU's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3VOD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate VOD's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TU leads on balance| Metric | TU | VOD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -1.4% | 7.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -14.4% | -260.4% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 31.5% |
| Operating margin | 14.8% | 8.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -6.6% | -0.8% |
| Debt to equity | 2.37 | 1.04 |
Performance
VOD leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | TU | VOD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 5.8% | 2.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.4% | -4.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -17.1% | 2.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -31.2% | 4.5% |
| Year to date | -35.8% | 20.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -43.9% | 38.3% |
Technicals
VOD has the stronger structure| Metric | TU | VOD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 51.7 | 46.3 |
| ADX (14) | 39.6 | 18.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.5% | -3.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -26.6% | 3.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 31.8% | 29.9% |
Risk
Split| Metric | TU | VOD |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.01 | 0.52 |
| Sharpe ratio | -2.41 | 1 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.77 | 1.47 |
| Max drawdown | -49.6% | -20.3% |
| Current drawdown | -44.8% | -10.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 25.1% | 32.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.5% | -2.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, TU or VOD?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, VOD is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 46 against TU's 40. The edge comes from quality and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is TU or VOD the better buy right now?
VOD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor VOD over TU?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. VOD leads Quality by 12 points; VOD leads Value by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, TU or VOD?
Analyst price targets imply +31.3% upside for TU and +32.1% for VOD. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, TU or VOD?
VOD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. VOD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, TU or VOD?
TU on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, TU or VOD?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, TU or VOD?
VOD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. VOD carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is TU more profitable than VOD?
TU leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 38.9% vs 31.5%; operating margin 14.8% vs 8.6%; ttm roe -6.6% vs -0.8%.
Is VOD's lead over TU getting stronger or weaker?
VOD lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the TU vs VOD verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TU closes the Quality gap — currently 12 points behind, the largest single contributor to VOD's edge; TU's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; VOD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate VOD's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about TU and VOD?
TU: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. VOD: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on TU is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On VOD it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare TU and VOD with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.