TXT vs VSEC Stock Comparison
Compare TXT and VSEC across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between TXT and VSEC?
TXT leads the current stock comparison as Textron Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Textron Inc. vs VSE Corporation
TXT leads
TXT leads by 15 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 4 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors VSEC on target upside.
Competitive: 3 of 6 evidence groups support TXT, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Textron Inc.
VSE Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TXT over VSEC, 49 versus 34 as of Sep 11, 2026. TXT's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience. TXT also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors VSEC. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TXT today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. TXT lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 15 points over 30 sessions. TXT leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Textron Inc. and VSE Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare TXT and VSEC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value71 vs 36TXT +35
- Risk Resilience69 vs 51TXT +18
- Momentum24 vs 19TXT +5
- Quality39 vs 35TXT +4
3 of 6 evidence groups favor TXT. TXT’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No new signals fired.
TXT's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — TXT and VSEC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TXT (Textron Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
VSEC (VSE Corporation): the counter-case, on fundamentals, technicals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 50.7% against 18.4%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TXTTXT on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
VSECVSEC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TXTTXT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 35 points.
Momentum
TXTTXT on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
TXTTXT on Risk Resilience, by 18 points.
Analyst upside
VSECVSEC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors TXT, analyst targets favor VSEC. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | TXT | VSEC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +23.2% | +29.7% | VSEC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +14% | +31.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TXT. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TXT | 49 vs 34 |
| Fundamentals | VSECon balance | revenue growth 3.6% vs 38.4%; EPS growth 13.6% vs -13.2%; TTM ROE 11.9% vs 3.7%; gross margin 12% vs 14%; operating margin 8.3% vs 11.2% — VSEC takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TXT | Value 71 vs 36 |
| Technicals | VSEC | Price vs 50-day -7.1% vs -8.3%; vs 200-day -12% vs -2.8% |
| Risk Resilience | TXT | Risk Resilience 69 vs 51 |
| Analyst expectations | VSEC | Target upside 23.2% vs 29.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of TXT and VSEC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 15 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TXT.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10TXT lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 15 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TXT +15
- 49 vs 34
- 7 sessions ago
- TXT +15
- 49 vs 34
- 30 sessions ago
- TXT +4
- 52 vs 48
- 90 sessions ago
- TXT +10
- 57 vs 47
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Aug 17 when TXT moved ahead of VSEC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 4 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.29%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.4%)
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.29%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.20%)
TXT leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.27%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.21%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1VSEC closes the Value gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to TXT's edge.
- 2VSEC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3TXT's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
VSEC leads on balance| Metric | TXT | VSEC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.6% | 38.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 13.6% | -13.2% |
| Gross margin | 12% | 14% |
| Operating margin | 8.3% | 11.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11.9% | 3.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.52 | 0.35 |
Performance
VSEC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | TXT | VSEC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.1% | -2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -10.9% | -20.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -13.2% | 11.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -15.1% | -10.5% |
| Year to date | -8.9% | 11.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -3.1% | 17.3% |
Technicals
VSEC has the stronger structure| Metric | TXT | VSEC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 27.5 | 34.8 |
| ADX (14) | 37.3 | 18.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -7.1% | -8.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -12% | -2.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 18.4% | 50.7% |
Risk
TXT is the more resilient| Metric | TXT | VSEC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.73 | 2.32 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.08 | 0.51 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.11 | 0.84 |
| Max drawdown | -21.5% | -30.4% |
| Current drawdown | -21.4% | -20.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 26.6% | 58.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.6% | -5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, TXT or VSEC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TXT is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 49 against VSEC's 34. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is TXT or VSEC the better buy right now?
TXT carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TXT over VSEC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TXT leads Value by 35 points; TXT leads Risk Resilience by 18 points; TXT leads Momentum by 5 points. TXT leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by VSEC simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, TXT or VSEC?
Analyst price targets imply +23.2% upside for TXT and +29.7% for VSEC, so the Street currently favors VSEC. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors TXT. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, TXT or VSEC?
TXT is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TXT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 35 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, TXT or VSEC?
VSEC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, TXT or VSEC?
TXT on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, TXT or VSEC?
TXT is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TXT on Risk Resilience, by 18 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is TXT more profitable than VSEC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 12% vs 14%; operating margin 8.3% vs 11.2%; ttm roe 11.9% vs 3.7%. TXT leads on one measure and VSEC on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is TXT's lead over VSEC getting stronger or weaker?
TXT lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 15 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-17, when TXT moved ahead of VSEC.
What would change the TXT vs VSEC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: VSEC closes the Value gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to TXT's edge; VSEC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; TXT's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 4 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about TXT and VSEC?
TXT: 1 bullish / 4 bearish, conflicted. VSEC: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on TXT is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On VSEC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare TXT and VSEC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.