UAL vs UNP Stock Comparison
UNP currently leads UAL in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 64 vs 49. The clearest difference is momentum, while UAL has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between UAL and UNP?
UNP leads the current stock comparison as Union Pacific Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
United Airlines Holdings, Inc. vs Union Pacific Corporation
UNP leads
UNP leads by 15 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from UAL. Wall Street currently favors UAL on target upside.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support UNP, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
Union Pacific Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors UNP over UAL, 64 versus 49 as of Oct 21, 2026. UNP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while UAL holds the stronger value profile. UNP also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors UAL. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor UNP today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. UNP lead: Reversed — UAL led by 9 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; UNP now leads by 15.
Compare United Airlines Holdings, Inc. and Union Pacific Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare UAL and UNP against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum21 vs 85UNP +64
- Value72 vs 43UAL +29
- Risk Resilience41 vs 67UNP +26
- Quality52 vs 67UNP +15
4 of 6 evidence groups favor UNP. UNP’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; UAL keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +13
New signals
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
UNP's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — UAL and UNP both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
UNP (Union Pacific Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
UAL (United Airlines Holdings, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 36.1% against 12.4%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
UNPUNP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
UALUAL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
UALUAL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points.
Momentum
UNPUNP on the Momentum factor, by 64 points.
Lower downside
UNPUNP on Risk Resilience, by 26 points.
Analyst upside
UALUAL on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors UNP, analyst targets favor UAL. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | UAL | UNP | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +54.9% | +10.4% | UAL has more room |
| Target dispersion | +49.5% | +28% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor UNP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | UNP | 49 vs 64 |
| Fundamentals | UNPon balance | revenue growth 21% vs 10.4%; EPS growth 15% vs 17.1%; TTM ROE 22.5% vs 38.6%; gross margin 65.1% vs 45.5%; operating margin 7.7% vs 39.9% — UNP takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | UAL | Value 72 vs 43 |
| Technicals | UNP | Price vs 50-day -8.1% vs 0.1%; vs 200-day -9.9% vs 7.5% |
| Risk Resilience | UNP | Risk Resilience 41 vs 67 |
| Analyst expectations | UAL | Target upside 54.9% vs 10.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of UAL and UNP and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 15 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on UNP.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20UNP lead: Reversed — UAL led by 9 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; UNP now leads by 15.
- Today
- UNP +15
- 49 vs 64
- 7 sessions ago
- UNP +15
- 49 vs 64
- 30 sessions ago
- UAL +9
- 59 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- UNP +4
- 55 vs 59
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Oct 8 when UNP moved ahead of UAL.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only UAL
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.34%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
4 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only UNP
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active.
UNP leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +3.99%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.09%, AIQ +3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1UAL closes the Momentum gap — currently 64 points behind, the largest single contributor to UNP's edge.
- 2UAL's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3UNP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
UNP leads on balance| Metric | UAL | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 21% | 10.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 15% | 17.1% |
| Gross margin | 65.1% | 45.5% |
| Operating margin | 7.7% | 39.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 22.5% | 38.6% |
| Debt to equity | 2.02 | 1.51 |
Performance
UNP leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | UAL | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.3% | 1.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -15.1% | 4.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -16.6% | -1.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 0.7% | 14.5% |
| Year to date | -12.6% | 24.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -0.4% | 28.4% |
Technicals
UNP has the stronger structure| Metric | UAL | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 27.4 | 78.9 |
| ADX (14) | 23.1 | 26.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -8.1% | 0.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -9.9% | 7.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 36.1% | 12.4% |
Risk
UNP is the more resilient| Metric | UAL | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.2 | 0.17 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.13 | 1.01 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.25 | 1.57 |
| Max drawdown | -29.8% | -13.2% |
| Current drawdown | -28.2% | -7.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 48.2% | 22.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.4% | -2.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, UAL or UNP?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, UNP is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 64 against UAL's 49. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. UAL is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is UAL or UNP the better buy right now?
UNP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor UNP over UAL?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. UNP leads Momentum by 64 points; UAL leads Value by 29 points; UNP leads Risk Resilience by 26 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, UAL or UNP?
Analyst price targets imply +54.9% upside for UAL and +10.4% for UNP, so the Street currently favors UAL. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors UNP. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, UAL or UNP?
UAL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. UAL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, UAL or UNP?
UAL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, UAL or UNP?
UNP on the Momentum factor, by 64 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, UAL or UNP?
UNP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. UNP on Risk Resilience, by 26 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is UAL more profitable than UNP?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 65.1% vs 45.5%; operating margin 7.7% vs 39.9%; ttm roe 22.5% vs 38.6%. UAL leads on one measure and UNP on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is UNP's lead over UAL getting stronger or weaker?
UNP lead: Reversed — UAL led by 9 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; UNP now leads by 15. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-08, when UNP moved ahead of UAL.
What would change the UAL vs UNP verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: UAL closes the Momentum gap — currently 64 points behind, the largest single contributor to UNP's edge; UAL's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; UNP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about UAL and UNP?
UAL: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. UNP: 4 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on UAL is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On UNP it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare UAL and UNP with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.