UEC vs UUUU Stock Comparison
Compare UEC and UUUU across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between UEC and UUUU?
UEC leads the current stock comparison as Uranium Energy Corp., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Uranium Energy Corp. vs Energy Fuels Inc.
UEC leads
UEC leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support UEC.
Uranium Energy Corp.
Energy Fuels Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors UEC over UUUU, 48 versus 41 as of Sep 6, 2026. UEC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality. UEC also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor UEC today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. UEC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Uranium Energy Corp. and Energy Fuels Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare UEC and UUUU against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience15%56 vs 40UEC +16
- Quality30%49 vs 37UEC +12
- Momentum25%57 vs 53UEC +4
- Value30%34 vs 34Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor UEC. UEC’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-05, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-04.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
UEC's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — UEC and UUUU both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
UEC (Uranium Energy Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
UUUU (Energy Fuels Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
UECUEC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
UUUUUUUU on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
UECUEC on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
UECUEC on Risk Resilience, by 16 points.
Analyst upside
UECUEC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | UEC | UUUU | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +59.9% | +50% | UEC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +82.7% | +61% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor UEC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | UEC | 48 vs 41 |
| Fundamentals | UUUUon balance | revenue growth -100% vs -29.9%; EPS growth -281.9% vs -179%; TTM ROE -8.1% vs -11.3%; gross margin 42.3% vs 43.2%; operating margin -6.3% vs -88.8% — UUUU takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 34 vs 34 |
| Technicals | UEC | Price vs 50-day 6.7% vs 6.9%; vs 200-day -13% vs -16.8% |
| Risk Resilience | UEC | Risk Resilience 56 vs 40 |
| Analyst expectations | UEC | Target upside 59.9% vs 50% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of UEC and UUUU and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on UEC.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 24 – Sep 5UEC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- UEC +7
- 48 vs 41
- 7 sessions ago
- UEC +7
- 48 vs 41
- 30 sessions ago
- UEC +5
- 51 vs 46
- 90 sessions ago
- UEC +9
- 44 vs 35
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (22.70%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.74%)
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (28.41%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.95%)
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.26%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.84%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1UUUU closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to UEC's edge.
- 2UUUU's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3UEC starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
UUUU leads on balance| Metric | UEC | UUUU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -100% | -29.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -281.9% | -179% |
| Gross margin | 42.3% | 43.2% |
| Operating margin | -6.3% | -88.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -8.1% | -11.3% |
| Debt to equity | 0 | 0.86 |
Performance
UUUU leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | UEC | UUUU |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -6.9% | -1.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -8.8% | -3.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -10.8% | -24% |
| Year to date | -1.2% | -0.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 0.9% | 26.5% |
Technicals
UEC has the stronger structure| Metric | UEC | UUUU |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 52.7 | 47.8 |
| ADX (14) | 19 | 13.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 6.7% | 6.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | -13% | -16.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 76.1% | 65.8% |
Risk
UEC is the more resilient| Metric | UEC | UUUU |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.93 | 2.76 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.37 | 0.69 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.63 | 1.26 |
| Max drawdown | -55.1% | -61.3% |
| Current drawdown | -42.7% | -47.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 79.7% | 90.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -7.7% | -7.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, UEC or UUUU?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, UEC is the stronger of the two as of Sep 6, 2026, scoring 48 against UUUU's 41. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is UEC or UUUU the better buy right now?
UEC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 6, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor UEC over UUUU?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. UEC leads Risk Resilience by 16 points; UEC leads Quality by 12 points; UEC leads Momentum by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, UEC or UUUU?
Analyst price targets imply +59.9% upside for UEC and +50% for UUUU, so the Street currently favors UEC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, UEC or UUUU?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, UEC or UUUU?
UUUU on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, UEC or UUUU?
UEC on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, UEC or UUUU?
UEC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. UEC on Risk Resilience, by 16 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is UEC more profitable than UUUU?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 42.3% vs 43.2%; operating margin -6.3% vs -88.8%; ttm roe -8.1% vs -11.3%. UEC leads on two measures and UUUU on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is UEC's lead over UUUU getting stronger or weaker?
UEC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-24 and 2026-09-05. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the UEC vs UUUU verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: UUUU closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to UEC's edge; UUUU's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; UEC starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about UEC and UUUU?
UEC: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral. UUUU: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on UEC is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On UUUU it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare UEC and UUUU with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.