UGI vs WEC Stock Comparison
UGI currently leads WEC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 62 vs 54. The clearest difference is value.
What is the main difference between UGI and WEC?
UGI leads the current stock comparison as UGI Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
UGI Corporation vs WEC Energy Group, Inc.
UGI leads
UGI leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support UGI, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
UGI Corporation
WEC Energy Group, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors UGI over WEC, 62 versus 54 as of Oct 31, 2026. UGI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience. UGI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor UGI today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. UGI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare UGI Corporation and WEC Energy Group, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare UGI and WEC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value67 vs 48UGI +19
- Risk Resilience66 vs 50UGI +16
- Quality45 vs 46Even
- Momentum74 vs 74Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor UGI. UGI’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
UGI's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — UGI and WEC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
UGI (UGI Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
WEC (WEC Energy Group, Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
UGIUGI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
WECWEC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
UGIUGI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
UGIUGI on Risk Resilience, by 16 points.
Analyst upside
UGIUGI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | UGI | WEC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +16.4% | -0.1% | UGI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +6.7% | +17.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | UGI | WEC |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 2.67% | 7.13% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $1.315 | $2.530 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $1.500 | $3.570 |
| Years increased | 4 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #311 | #186 |
WEC grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 7.13% a year against UGI's 2.67%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor UGI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | UGI | 62 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | WECon balance | revenue growth -50.4% vs -40%; EPS growth -125.6% vs -62.8%; TTM ROE 13.2% vs 12.2%; gross margin 46.7% vs 62%; operating margin 14% vs 24.1% — WEC takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | UGI | Value 67 vs 48 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day 2.5% vs 9.9%; vs 200-day 4.8% vs -0.8% |
| Risk Resilience | UGI | Risk Resilience 66 vs 50 |
| Analyst expectations | UGI | Target upside 16.4% vs -0.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of UGI and WEC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on UGI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28UGI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- UGI +8
- 62 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- UGI +9
- 63 vs 54
- 30 sessions ago
- UGI +8
- 53 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- UGI +16
- 62 vs 46
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jul 2 when UGI moved ahead of WEC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only UGI
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.85%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only WEC
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (5.56%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
WEC is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.29%, AIQ -1 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.26%, AIQ -2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1WEC closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to UGI's edge.
- 2WEC's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3UGI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
WEC leads on balance| Metric | UGI | WEC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -50.4% | -40% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -125.6% | -62.8% |
| Gross margin | 46.7% | 62% |
| Operating margin | 14% | 24.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 13.2% | 12.2% |
| Debt to equity | 1.29 | 1.63 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | UGI | WEC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.3% | 1.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 7.8% | 9.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 6.2% | 0.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 2.3% | -3.5% |
| Year to date | 2.7% | 4.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 14% | -4.6% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | UGI | WEC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 64.7 | 71.3 |
| ADX (14) | 16.5 | 37.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 2.5% | 9.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 4.8% | -0.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 20.4% | 19.3% |
Risk
UGI is the more resilient| Metric | UGI | WEC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.02 | -0.13 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.51 | -0.41 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.7 | -0.71 |
| Max drawdown | -20.4% | -15.2% |
| Current drawdown | -5.4% | -7% |
| Annualized volatility | 24.5% | 16.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.9% | -1.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, UGI or WEC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, UGI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 62 against WEC's 54. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is UGI or WEC the better buy right now?
UGI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor UGI over WEC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. UGI leads Value by 19 points; UGI leads Risk Resilience by 16 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, UGI or WEC?
Analyst price targets imply +16.4% upside for UGI and -0.1% for WEC, so the Street currently favors UGI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, UGI or WEC?
UGI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. UGI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, UGI or WEC?
WEC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, UGI or WEC?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, UGI or WEC?
UGI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. UGI on Risk Resilience, by 16 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is UGI more profitable than WEC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 46.7% vs 62%; operating margin 14% vs 24.1%; ttm roe 13.2% vs 12.2%. UGI leads on one measure and WEC on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is UGI's lead over WEC getting stronger or weaker?
UGI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-07-02, when UGI moved ahead of WEC.
What would change the UGI vs WEC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: WEC closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to UGI's edge; WEC's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; UGI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about UGI and WEC?
UGI: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. WEC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on UGI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On WEC it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare UGI and WEC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.