VTR vs WELL Stock Comparison
WELL currently leads VTR in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 49 vs 35. The clearest difference is quality, while VTR has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between VTR and WELL?
WELL leads the current stock comparison as Welltower Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Ventas, Inc. vs Welltower Inc.
WELL leads
WELL leads by 14 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 11 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors VTR on target upside.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support WELL, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Ventas, Inc.
Welltower Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors WELL over VTR, 49 versus 35 as of Oct 21, 2026. WELL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while VTR holds the stronger value profile. WELL also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors VTR. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor WELL today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. WELL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 14 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Ventas, Inc. and Welltower Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare VTR and WELL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality18 vs 44WELL +26
- Momentum54 vs 76WELL +22
- Risk Resilience50 vs 60WELL +10
- Value29 vs 25VTR +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor WELL. WELL’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; VTR keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +17
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +10
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
WELL's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — VTR and WELL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
WELL (Welltower Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
VTR (Ventas, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
WELLWELL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
VTRVTR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
VTRVTR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
WELLWELL on the Momentum factor, by 22 points.
Lower downside
WELLWELL on Risk Resilience, by 10 points.
Analyst upside
VTRVTR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors WELL, analyst targets favor VTR. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | VTR | WELL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +15.8% | +8.5% | VTR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +22.2% | +19.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 14 | 13 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | VTR | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | -2.17% | 0.87% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $2.143 | $2.700 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $1.920 | $2.820 |
| Years increased | 1 | 2 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | No (1) |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | not ranked |
WELL grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 0.87% a year against VTR's -2.17%.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor WELL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | WELL | 35 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | WELLon balance | revenue growth 4.4% vs 7.2%; EPS growth 16.7% vs -67.3%; TTM ROE 2% vs 3.1%; gross margin -2.6% vs 38.8%; operating margin 12.9% vs 5.4% — WELL takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | VTR | Value 29 vs 25 |
| Technicals | WELL | Price vs 50-day -3% vs 0.3%; vs 200-day 0.4% vs 9.9% |
| Risk Resilience | WELL | Risk Resilience 50 vs 60 |
| Analyst expectations | VTR | Target upside 15.8% vs 8.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of VTR and WELL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 14 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on WELL.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20WELL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 14 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- WELL +14
- 35 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- WELL +16
- 31 vs 47
- 30 sessions ago
- WELL +11
- 30 vs 41
- 90 sessions ago
- WELL +8
- 33 vs 41
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish
No signal that the other name lacks.
4 bullish / 0 bearish
Only WELL
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.28%, AIQ +4 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 3 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.63%, AIQ +3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1VTR closes the Quality gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to WELL's edge.
- 2VTR generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active.
- 3WELL's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
WELL leads on balance| Metric | VTR | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.4% | 7.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 16.7% | -67.3% |
| Gross margin | -2.6% | 38.8% |
| Operating margin | 12.9% | 5.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 2% | 3.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.93 | 0.42 |
Performance
WELL leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | VTR | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.1% | 3.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.4% | 3.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -11% | -2.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 5.3% | 15.4% |
| Year to date | 11.8% | 28.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 24.4% | 38.4% |
Technicals
WELL has the stronger structure| Metric | VTR | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 54.7 | 61.6 |
| ADX (14) | 22.2 | 13.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -3% | 0.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.4% | 9.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 23.4% | 18.8% |
Risk
WELL is the more resilient| Metric | VTR | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.24 | -0.04 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.84 | 1.31 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.15 | 1.95 |
| Max drawdown | -20.4% | -12.6% |
| Current drawdown | -14% | -5.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 22.7% | 22.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.2% | -2.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, VTR or WELL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, WELL is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 49 against VTR's 35. The edge comes from quality and momentum. VTR is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is VTR or WELL the better buy right now?
WELL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor WELL over VTR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. WELL leads Quality by 26 points; WELL leads Momentum by 22 points; WELL leads Risk Resilience by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, VTR or WELL?
Analyst price targets imply +15.8% upside for VTR and +8.5% for WELL, so the Street currently favors VTR. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors WELL. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, VTR or WELL?
VTR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. VTR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, VTR or WELL?
VTR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, VTR or WELL?
WELL on the Momentum factor, by 22 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, VTR or WELL?
WELL is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. WELL on Risk Resilience, by 10 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is VTR more profitable than WELL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin -2.6% vs 38.8%; operating margin 12.9% vs 5.4%; ttm roe 2% vs 3.1%. VTR leads on one measure and WELL on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is WELL's lead over VTR getting stronger or weaker?
WELL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 14 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the VTR vs WELL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: VTR closes the Quality gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to WELL's edge; VTR generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active; WELL's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about VTR and WELL?
VTR: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. WELL: 4 bullish / 0 bearish. The most decision-relevant rule on VTR is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On WELL it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare VTR and WELL with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.