WVE vs XNCR Stock Comparison
Compare WVE and XNCR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between WVE and XNCR?
XNCR leads the current stock comparison as Xencor, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Wave Life Sciences Ltd. vs Xencor, Inc.
XNCR leads
XNCR leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 10 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors WVE on target upside.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support XNCR, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Wave Life Sciences Ltd.
Xencor, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors XNCR over WVE, 45 versus 40 as of Sep 11, 2026. XNCR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while WVE holds the stronger quality profile. XNCR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors WVE. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor XNCR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. XNCR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Wave Life Sciences Ltd. and Xencor, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare WVE and XNCR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25 vs 50XNCR +25
- Risk Resilience40 vs 55XNCR +15
- Quality59 vs 48WVE +11
- Value34 vs 34Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor XNCR. XNCR’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; WVE keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
New signals
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
XNCR's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — WVE and XNCR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
XNCR (Xencor, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
WVE (Wave Life Sciences Ltd.): the counter-case, on quality, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
XNCRXNCR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
XNCRXNCR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
XNCRXNCR on the Momentum factor, by 25 points.
Lower downside
XNCRXNCR on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
WVEWVE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors XNCR, analyst targets favor WVE. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | WVE | XNCR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +212.2% | +40.3% | WVE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +41.9% | +75.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor XNCR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | XNCR | 40 vs 45 |
| Fundamentals | XNCRon balance | revenue growth -94.1% vs 10.3%; EPS growth -161.5% vs 83%; TTM ROE -50.1% vs -28.7%; gross margin 96.5% vs 43.3%; operating margin -3.3% vs -205.8% — XNCR takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 34 vs 34 |
| Technicals | XNCR | Price vs 50-day -17.6% vs 12.9%; vs 200-day -49.5% vs 58.8% |
| Risk Resilience | XNCR | Risk Resilience 40 vs 55 |
| Analyst expectations | WVE | Target upside 212.2% vs 40.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of WVE and XNCR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on XNCR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10XNCR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- XNCR +5
- 40 vs 45
- 7 sessions ago
- XNCR +7
- 43 vs 50
- 30 sessions ago
- XNCR +10
- 43 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- XNCR +6
- 47 vs 53
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Aug 7 when WVE moved ahead of XNCR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (66.61%)
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (41.52%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
XNCR leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.71%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.62%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1WVE closes the Momentum gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to XNCR's edge.
- 2WVE's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3XNCR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 5 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate XNCR's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
XNCR leads on balance| Metric | WVE | XNCR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -94.1% | 10.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -161.5% | 83% |
| Gross margin | 96.5% | 43.3% |
| Operating margin | -3.3% | -205.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -50.1% | -28.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.1 | 0.13 |
Performance
XNCR leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | WVE | XNCR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.3% | -9.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -10.9% | 4.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -17.5% | 105.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -66.8% | 101.5% |
| Year to date | -71.4% | 58.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -38.4% | 188.5% |
Technicals
XNCR has the stronger structure| Metric | WVE | XNCR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 30.4 | 38.5 |
| ADX (14) | 35.6 | 52 |
| Price vs 50-day | -17.6% | 12.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | -49.5% | 58.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 45.1% | 71.1% |
Risk
XNCR is the more resilient| Metric | WVE | XNCR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.35 | 1.24 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.27 | 1.88 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.57 | 3.32 |
| Max drawdown | -78.1% | -42.6% |
| Current drawdown | -78.1% | -17.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 168.1% | 67.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.9% | -5.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, WVE or XNCR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, XNCR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 45 against WVE's 40. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. WVE is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is WVE or XNCR the better buy right now?
XNCR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor XNCR over WVE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. XNCR leads Momentum by 25 points; XNCR leads Risk Resilience by 15 points; WVE leads Quality by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, WVE or XNCR?
Analyst price targets imply +212.2% upside for WVE and +40.3% for XNCR, so the Street currently favors WVE. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors XNCR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, WVE or XNCR?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, WVE or XNCR?
XNCR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, WVE or XNCR?
XNCR on the Momentum factor, by 25 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, WVE or XNCR?
XNCR is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. XNCR on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is WVE more profitable than XNCR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 96.5% vs 43.3%; operating margin -3.3% vs -205.8%; ttm roe -50.1% vs -28.7%. WVE leads on two measures and XNCR on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is XNCR's lead over WVE getting stronger or weaker?
XNCR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-07, when WVE moved ahead of XNCR.
What would change the WVE vs XNCR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: WVE closes the Momentum gap — currently 25 points behind, the largest single contributor to XNCR's edge; WVE's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; XNCR's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 5 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate XNCR's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about WVE and XNCR?
WVE: 0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral. XNCR: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on WVE is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On XNCR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare WVE and XNCR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.