Current etf page

ETF Analytics

BLOX ETF Holdings & Fundamentals

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset Management - CryptocurrencyScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

BLOXNicholas Crypto Income ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management - Cryptocurrency

Low Priority

Relative Laggard

BearishEdge 2/10
$12.01+$0.28 (+2.39%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    24
  • Value
    50
  • Quality
    35
  • Risk resilience
    44
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

BLOX Holdings

62 holdings; the ten largest make up 71.16% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 13, 2026.

Holdings
62
Top 10 weight
71.16%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
FBTC
18.00%
Expense ratio
0.99%
$99.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$13.65M
Top sector
Financial Services
64.41%
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1FBTCFidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund18.00%$58.43M
2ETHAiShares Ethereum Trust ETF9.48%$30.8M
3NGHTNicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF6.90%$22.39M
4IRENIREN Ltd5.77%$18.74M
5CIFRCipher Digital Inc5.73%$18.59M
6RIOTRiot Platforms Inc5.57%$18.09M
7HUTHUT 8 CORP5.33%$17.32M
8BHDGNicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF4.88%$15.84M
9TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4.78%$15.52M
10NVDANVIDIA Corp4.72%$15.31M
11GLXYGalaxy Digital Inc4.55%$14.78M
12FIGRFigure Technology Solutions Inc2.83%$9.19M
13APLDApplied Digital Corp2.55%$8.27M
14WULFTerawulf Inc2.37%$7.71M
15HOODRobinhood Markets Inc1.85%$6M
16CRCLCircle Internet Group Inc1.79%$5.82M
17COINCoinbase Global Inc1.71%$5.56M
18CRWVCoreWeave Inc1.37%$4.45M
19HOOD US 10/16/26 C301.33%$4.32M
20First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20311.20%$3.91M
21MARAMARA Holdings Inc0.92%$2.98M
22Cash & Other0.70%$2.27M
23IREN US 09/18/26 P480.62%-$2M
24IREN US 09/18/26 P46.50.46%$1.49M
25FIGR US 09/18/26 P400.41%-$1.33M

BLOX Expense Ratio

BLOX charges 0.99% a year, about $99.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$99.00
$25,000$247.50
$100,000$990.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$12.01
As of Oct 21, 2026
Fund size
$13.65M
Expense ratio
0.99%
Distribution yield
42.96%
Nicholasx ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
62
NAV
$11.52
Average volume
374.43K
Inception
Jun 16, 2025
Asset class
Multi-Asset
Primary exposure
Financial Services (64.41%)
Beta
2.96
Momentum score
24/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameNicholas Crypto Income ETF
IssuerNicholasx
Asset classMulti-Asset
Primary exposureFinancial Services (64.41%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateJun 16, 2025
Websitehttps://nicholasx.com/BLOX/

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$13.65M
Expense ratio0.99%
Holdings count62
NAV$11.52
Average volume374.43K
Distribution yield42.96%
Beta2.96

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Financial Services64.41%
Technology35.59%
Country exposure
FieldValue
United States91.45%
Taiwan (Province of China)4.48%
Other2.02%
Australia2.05%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
38/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
-1.1

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-56.12%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
24/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
50/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
44/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
57.72%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read BLOX's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to BLOX AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

BLOX ETF Analytics FAQ

What is BLOX's expense ratio?

BLOX's expense ratio shows the annual fund cost when available. Compare it with holdings, tracking exposure, liquidity, dividend yield, and volatility.

What is BLOX's dividend yield?

BLOX's dividend or distribution yield helps investors compare income potential. It should be weighed against fund strategy, expense ratio, and risk.

How diversified is BLOX?

BLOX's diversification depends on holdings count, top-position concentration, and sector exposure. Fund size and liquidity do not automatically mean broad diversification.

Is BLOX overvalued or undervalued?

ETF valuation depends on the valuation of its underlying holdings, sector exposure, and market regime. Use fund fundamentals with risk and technical context.