Current etf page

ETF Analytics

FVD ETF Holdings & Fundamentals

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset Management - IncomeScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

FVDFirst Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund

Financial Services / Asset Management - Income

Relative Leader / Watch

Strong Relative Position

NeutralEdge 9/10
$49.55−$0.02 (−0.04%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    79
  • Value
    55
  • Quality
    55
  • Risk resilience
    70
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

FVD Holdings

243 holdings; the ten largest make up 4.51% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 18, 2026.

Holdings
243
Top 10 weight
4.51%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
BNS
0.47%
Expense ratio
0.62%
$62.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$7.91B
Top sector
Financial Services
21.01%
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1BNSThe Bank of Nova Scotia0.47%$37.06M
2TAKTakeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (ADR)0.45%$35.72M
3TDThe Toronto-Dominion Bank0.45%$35.75M
4CVXChevron Corporation0.45%$35.63M
5VRSNVeriSign, Inc.0.45%$35.53M
6PFGPrincipal Financial Group, Inc.0.45%$35.44M
7SHELShell plc (ADR)0.45%$35.24M
8MFCManulife Financial Corporation0.45%$35.19M
9GILDGilead Sciences, Inc.0.45%$35.17M
10TXNMTXNM Energy Inc.0.45%$35.11M
11SLFSun Life Financial Inc.0.44%$35M
12TRVThe Travelers Companies, Inc.0.44%$35.03M
13TTETotalEnergies SE0.44%$35.06M
14TELTE Connectivity Plc0.44%$34.91M
15ACNAccenture plc0.44%$34.89M
16MSMMSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (Class A)0.44%$34.92M
17MOAltria Group, Inc.0.44%$34.82M
18DGXQuest Diagnostics Incorporated0.44%$34.71M
19WMBThe Williams Companies, Inc.0.44%$34.61M
20KMIKinder Morgan, Inc.0.44%$34.55M
21METMetLife, Inc.0.44%$34.61M
22BMOBank of Montreal0.44%$34.49M
23THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.0.44%$34.46M
24OGEOGE Energy Corp.0.44%$34.46M
25WTRGEssential Utilities, Inc.0.44%$34.44M

FVD Expense Ratio

FVD charges 0.62% a year, about $62.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$62.00
$25,000$155.00
$100,000$620.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$49.55
As of Oct 21, 2026
Fund size
$7.91B
Expense ratio
0.62%
Distribution yield
2.29%
First Trust ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
243
NAV
$48.91
Average volume
551.37K
Inception
Aug 19, 2003
Asset class
Equity Income
Primary exposure
Financial Services (21.01%)
Beta
0.49
Momentum score
79/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameFirst Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
IssuerFirst Trust
Asset classEquity Income
Primary exposureFinancial Services (21.01%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateAug 19, 2003
Websitehttps://www.ftportfolios.com/Retail/Etf/EtfSummary.aspx?Ticker=FVD

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$7.91B
Expense ratio0.62%
Holdings count243
NAV$48.91
Average volume551.37K
Distribution yield2.29%
Beta0.49

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Industrials14.46%
Utilities18.01%
Healthcare8.05%
Consumer Defensive10.92%
Real Estate7.97%
Financial Services21.01%
Communication Services2.85%
Consumer Cyclical5.03%
Country exposure
FieldValue
United States81.02%
Bermuda0.82%
Mexico0.42%
United Kingdom4.27%
Canada6.82%
Ireland1.73%
Cayman Islands0.39%
Japan1.27%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
63/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
0.38

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-8.11%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
79/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
55/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
70/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
10.26%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read FVD's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to FVD AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

FVD ETF Analytics FAQ

What is FVD's expense ratio?

FVD's expense ratio shows the annual fund cost when available. Compare it with holdings, tracking exposure, liquidity, dividend yield, and volatility.

What is FVD's dividend yield?

FVD's dividend or distribution yield helps investors compare income potential. It should be weighed against fund strategy, expense ratio, and risk.

How diversified is FVD?

FVD's diversification depends on holdings count, top-position concentration, and sector exposure. Fund size and liquidity do not automatically mean broad diversification.

Is FVD overvalued or undervalued?

ETF valuation depends on the valuation of its underlying holdings, sector exposure, and market regime. Use fund fundamentals with risk and technical context.