ETF Data
BITO ETF Data
Fund Profile · Snapshot Metrics · Exposure · Technicals · Risk
BITOProShares Bitcoin ETF
Financial Services / Asset Management
Low Priority
Above Peers
Latest quote
- Momentum60
- Value—
- Quality68
- Risk resilience44
- Sentiment—
ETF Data Overview
ETF pages show fund-native profile, cost, size, liquidity, exposure, technical, and risk evidence.
ETF Snapshot Data
Updated Oct 21, 2026.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Fund name | ProShares Bitcoin ETF |
| Issuer | ProShares |
| Asset class | Alternatives |
| Primary exposure | Financial Services (66.51%) |
| Domicile | US |
| Inception date | Oct 18, 2021 |
| NAV currency | USD |
| CUSIP | — |
| ISIN | US74347G4405 |
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Price | $11.28 |
| Fund size | $2.24B |
| Expense ratio | 0.95% |
| Holdings count | 5 |
| NAV | $11.02 |
| Average volume | 172.16M |
| Distribution yield | 22.61% |
| AIQ Score | 60/100 |
ETF Holdings
Reported holdings from the latest ETF holder snapshot.
| Symbol | Holding | Weight | Market value |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQMM | PROSHARES GENIUS MNY MKT ETF | 69.17% | $1.13B |
| BITO | Net Other Assets (Liabilities) | 30.83% | $502.11M |
| BITO | CME BITCOIN FUT DIGITAL ASSETS 25/SEP/2026 BTCU6 CURNCY | 0.00% | $0 |
| BITO | COINBASE BIT FUT DIGITAL ASSETS 25/SEP/2026 BTIU6 CURNCY | 0.00% | $0 |
| BITO | S&P CME BITCOIN FUTURES DAILY ROLL INDEX SWAP Societe Generale | 0.00% | $0 |
ETF Exposure
Sector and country composition fields from ETF snapshots where available.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Financial Services | 66.51% |
| Cash & Others | 33.49% |
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| United States | 67.34% |
| Other | 32.66% |
Institutional Holder Snapshot
Latest downstream filing-reported holders and share-count changes for this ETF.
No downstream institutional holder rows are available for this ETF yet.
Current ETF Metrics
ETF-native fields sit beside technical and risk readings for deeper research.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% |
| Fund Size | $2.24B |
| NAV | $11.02 |
| Average Volume | 172.16M |
| Beta | 1.74 |
| 52-week high | $19.14 |
| 52-week low | $7.87 |
As of Oct 21, 2026
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Close | $11.28 |
| Volume | 81.5M |
| RSI (14) | 48.6 |
| MACD | 0.11 |
| MACD signal | 0.16 |
| MACD histogram | -0.05 |
| ADX (14) | 20.23 |
| SMA (50) | $10.61 |
| SMA (200) | $10.04 |
| ATR (14) | $0.29 |
| Historical volatility (annualized) | 21.08% |
| Volume (20-day average) | 71M |
As of Oct 21, 2026
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Resilience score | 44/100 |
| Beta | 1.74 |
| Annual volatility | 46.55% |
| Max Drawdown | -57.37% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.89 |
| VaR (95%, 1-day) | -4.48% |
As of Oct 21, 2026
Additional ETF Metrics
Expanded ETF structure fields appear here when the entitlement and source coverage allow them.
No additional ETF structure metrics are available.
Related Links
BITO ETF Data FAQ
What data matters most for BITO ETF?
BITO ETF data should be read through fund-native fields such as expense ratio, fund size, NAV, holdings, exposure, distribution yield, liquidity, technicals, and risk measures.
Why does BITO not show revenue or EPS?
BITO is an ETF, not an operating company. It does not have company revenue, EPS, margins, or free cash flow; those belong to the underlying holdings, not the fund wrapper.
What does BITO's expense ratio show?
BITO's expense ratio is the annual fund cost when available. It should be compared with fund strategy, income profile, liquidity, and exposure.
How should investors read BITO's holdings data?
BITO's holdings data shows what the fund owns and how concentrated the portfolio is. Holdings weights and sector exposure explain much of the fund's risk and return behavior.
What does BITO's distribution yield mean?
BITO's distribution yield describes the income paid by the ETF over the measured period. It should be read with payout history, fund strategy, fees, and price risk.
Why can ETF profile fields be unavailable?
ETF profile fields can be unavailable when the provider snapshot, serving layer, or entitlement path has not published that field for BITO. Missing ETF fields should remain blank rather than be inferred from stock fundamentals.