Current etf page

ETF Analytics

KBWD ETF Holdings & Fundamentals

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset ManagementScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

KBWDInvesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management

Low Priority

In Line With Peers

NeutralEdge 4/10
$10.21−$0.04 (−0.39%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    25
  • Value
    73
  • Quality
    46
  • Risk resilience
    65
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

KBWD Holdings

40 holdings; the ten largest make up 37.07% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 18, 2026.

Holdings
40
Top 10 weight
37.07%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
FSK
4.20%
Expense ratio
5.39%
$539.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$325.48M
Top sector
Financial Services
57.72%
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1FSKFS KKR Capital Corp4.20%$16.47M
2GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC Inc4.03%$15.79M
3ORCOrchid Island Capital Inc4.00%$15.67M
4IVRInvesco Mortgage Capital Inc3.82%$14.99M
5DXDynex Capital Inc3.70%$14.51M
6ARRARMOUR Residential REIT Inc3.67%$14.4M
7CGBDCarlyle Secured Lending Inc3.56%$13.95M
8MFAMFA Financial Inc3.38%$13.25M
9PFLTPennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd3.37%$13.21M
10AGNCAGNC Investment Corp3.35%$13.12M
11PMTPennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust3.33%$13.05M
12TRINTrinity Capital Inc3.31%$12.99M
13NLYAnnaly Capital Management Inc3.19%$12.5M
14NMFCNew Mountain Finance Corp2.87%$11.27M
15OBDCBlue Owl Capital Corp2.87%$11.26M
16NCDLNuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp2.70%$10.59M
17ADAMAdamas Trust Inc2.54%$9.96M
18AINVMidCap Financial Investment Corp2.52%$9.9M
19CCAPCrescent Capital BDC Inc2.50%$9.79M
20RWTRedwood Trust Inc2.49%$9.77M
21CIONCION Investment Corp2.48%$9.72M
22WUWestern Union Co/The2.42%$9.51M
23ABRArbor Realty Trust Inc2.40%$9.42M
24TCPCBlackRock TCP Capital Corp2.37%$9.29M
25ABAllianceBernstein Holding LP2.30%$9.03M

KBWD Expense Ratio

KBWD charges 5.39% a year, about $539.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$539.00
$25,000$1347.50
$100,000$5390.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$10.21
As of Oct 21, 2026
Fund size
$325.48M
Expense ratio
5.39%
Distribution yield
16.89%
Invesco ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
40
NAV
$10.08
Average volume
498.13K
Inception
Dec 2, 2010
Asset class
Equity
Primary exposure
Financial Services (57.72%)
Beta
0.8
Momentum score
25/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameInvesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
IssuerInvesco
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureFinancial Services (57.72%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateDec 2, 2010
Websitehttps://www.invesco.com/content/invesco/us/en/financial-products/etfs/invesco-kbw-high-dividend-yield-financial-etf.html

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$325.48M
Expense ratio5.39%
Holdings count40
NAV$10.08
Average volume498.13K
Distribution yield16.89%
Beta0.8

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Real Estate42.28%
Financial Services57.72%
Country exposure
FieldValue
Other0.00%
United States100.00%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
52/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
-1.68

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-31.51%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
25/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
73/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
65/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
17.50%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read KBWD's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to KBWD AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

KBWD ETF Analytics FAQ

What is KBWD's expense ratio?

KBWD's expense ratio shows the annual fund cost when available. Compare it with holdings, tracking exposure, liquidity, dividend yield, and volatility.

What is KBWD's dividend yield?

KBWD's dividend or distribution yield helps investors compare income potential. It should be weighed against fund strategy, expense ratio, and risk.

How diversified is KBWD?

KBWD's diversification depends on holdings count, top-position concentration, and sector exposure. Fund size and liquidity do not automatically mean broad diversification.

Is KBWD overvalued or undervalued?

ETF valuation depends on the valuation of its underlying holdings, sector exposure, and market regime. Use fund fundamentals with risk and technical context.