AMD vs ON Stock Comparison
ON currently leads AMD in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 46 vs 36. The clearest difference is value, while AMD has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between AMD and ON?
ON leads the current stock comparison as ON Semiconductor Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. vs ON Semiconductor Corporation
ON leads
ON leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from AMD.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support ON, and the lead recently changed hands.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
ON Semiconductor Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ON over AMD, 46 versus 36 as of Oct 21, 2026. ON's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while AMD holds the stronger quality profile. ON also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ON today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. ON lead: Reversed — AMD led by 7 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; ON now leads by 10.
Compare Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ON Semiconductor Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare AMD and ON against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value24 vs 58ON +34
- Momentum15 vs 38ON +23
- Quality63 vs 46AMD +17
- Risk Resilience42 vs 35AMD +7
3 of 6 evidence groups favor ON. ON’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; AMD keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
ON's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AMD and ON both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ON (ON Semiconductor Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
AMD (Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, risk resilience, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ONON on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AMDAMD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
ONON on the peer-relative Value factor, by 34 points.
Momentum
ONON on the Momentum factor, by 23 points.
Lower downside
AMDAMD on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
ONON on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AMD | ON | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +4.9% | +34.2% | ON has more room |
| Target dispersion | +170.7% | +106.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 29 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ON. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | ON | 36 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | AMD | revenue growth 12.5% vs 6%; EPS growth 64.7% vs 8.2%; TTM ROE 10.1% vs 8.4%; gross margin 53.2% vs 37.4%; operating margin 15.7% vs 11.7% |
| Valuation | ON | Value 24 vs 58 |
| Technicals | AMD | Price vs 50-day 2.4% vs 1.7%; vs 200-day 34.6% vs -7.6% |
| Risk Resilience | AMD | Risk Resilience 42 vs 35 |
| Analyst expectations | ON | Target upside 4.9% vs 34.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AMD and ON and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ON.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20ON lead: Reversed — AMD led by 7 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; ON now leads by 10.
- Today
- ON +10
- 36 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- ON +6
- 39 vs 45
- 30 sessions ago
- AMD +7
- 56 vs 49
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 48 vs 48
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Oct 2 when ON moved ahead of AMD.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only AMD
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (35.76%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
Only ON
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (8.16%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, MACD Bearish Crossover.
AMD is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +3.36%, AIQ -1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.75%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AMD closes the Value gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to ON's edge.
- 2AMD's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3ON starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AMD leads on balance| Metric | AMD | ON |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 12.5% | 6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 64.7% | 8.2% |
| Gross margin | 53.2% | 37.4% |
| Operating margin | 15.7% | 11.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.1% | 8.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.06 | 0.62 |
Performance
AMD leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | AMD | ON |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -11.7% | -1.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -14.3% | 2.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.2% | -18.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 88% | -13% |
| Year to date | 149.7% | 39.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 128% | 42.8% |
Technicals
AMD has the stronger structure| Metric | AMD | ON |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 30.5 | 47.9 |
| ADX (14) | 22.3 | 18.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 34.6% | -7.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 41.5% | 48.2% |
Risk
AMD is the more resilient| Metric | AMD | ON |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.2 | 2.61 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.51 | 0.84 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.55 | 1.16 |
| Max drawdown | -27.8% | -50.3% |
| Current drawdown | -17.7% | -43.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 67.9% | 62.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.8% | -5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AMD or ON?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ON is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 46 against AMD's 36. The edge comes from value and momentum. AMD is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AMD or ON the better buy right now?
ON carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ON over AMD?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ON leads Value by 34 points; ON leads Momentum by 23 points; AMD leads Quality by 17 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AMD or ON?
Analyst price targets imply +4.9% upside for AMD and +34.2% for ON, so the Street currently favors ON. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AMD or ON?
ON is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. ON on the peer-relative Value factor, by 34 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AMD or ON?
AMD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AMD or ON?
ON on the Momentum factor, by 23 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AMD or ON?
AMD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AMD on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AMD more profitable than ON?
AMD leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 53.2% vs 37.4%; operating margin 15.7% vs 11.7%; ttm roe 10.1% vs 8.4%.
Is ON's lead over AMD getting stronger or weaker?
ON lead: Reversed — AMD led by 7 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; ON now leads by 10. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-02, when ON moved ahead of AMD.
What would change the AMD vs ON verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AMD closes the Value gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to ON's edge; AMD's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; ON starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AMD and ON?
AMD: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. ON: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AMD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On ON it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare AMD and ON with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.