AMD vs WDC Stock Comparison
WDC currently leads AMD in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 43 vs 36. The clearest difference is quality, while AMD has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between AMD and WDC?
WDC leads the current stock comparison as Western Digital Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation
WDC leads
WDC leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, having only recently taken the lead back from AMD.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support WDC, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Western Digital Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors WDC over AMD, 43 versus 36 as of Oct 21, 2026. WDC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while AMD holds the stronger risk resilience profile. WDC also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor WDC today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. WDC lead: Reversed — AMD led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; WDC now leads by 7.
Compare Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Western Digital Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare AMD and WDC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality63 vs 90WDC +27
- Risk Resilience42 vs 29AMD +13
- Value24 vs 32WDC +8
- Momentum15 vs 9AMD +6
4 of 6 evidence groups favor WDC. WDC’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; AMD keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
WDC's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AMD and WDC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
WDC (Western Digital Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
AMD (Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
WDCWDC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AMDAMD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
WDCWDC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points.
Momentum
AMDAMD on the Momentum factor, by 6 points.
Lower downside
AMDAMD on Risk Resilience, by 13 points.
Analyst upside
WDCWDC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AMD | WDC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +4.9% | +51.9% | WDC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +170.7% | +117.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 29 | 12 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor WDC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | WDC | 36 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | WDCon balance | revenue growth 12.5% vs 12.3%; TTM ROE 10.1% vs 118.6%; gross margin 53.2% vs 48.9%; operating margin 15.7% vs 34.9% — WDC takes 2 of 3 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | WDC | Value 24 vs 32 |
| Technicals | AMD | Price vs 50-day 2.4% vs -13.8%; vs 200-day 34.6% vs -11.6% |
| Risk Resilience | AMD | Risk Resilience 42 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | WDC | Target upside 4.9% vs 51.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AMD and WDC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on WDC.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20WDC lead: Reversed — AMD led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; WDC now leads by 7.
- Today
- WDC +7
- 36 vs 43
- 7 sessions ago
- WDC +4
- 39 vs 43
- 30 sessions ago
- AMD +2
- 56 vs 54
- 90 sessions ago
- WDC +11
- 48 vs 59
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 12 when WDC moved ahead of AMD.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only AMD
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, MACD Bearish Crossover.
WDC leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +3.36%, AIQ -1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.89%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AMD closes the Quality gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to WDC's edge.
- 2AMD's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3WDC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
WDC leads on balance| Metric | AMD | WDC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 12.5% | 12.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 64.7% | -0.3% |
| Gross margin | 53.2% | 48.9% |
| Operating margin | 15.7% | 34.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.1% | 118.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.06 | 0.12 |
Performance
AMD leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | AMD | WDC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -11.7% | -4.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -14.3% | -21.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.2% | -34.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 88% | -5.1% |
| Year to date | 149.7% | 111.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 128% | 191.1% |
Technicals
AMD has the stronger structure| Metric | AMD | WDC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 30.5 | 30.5 |
| ADX (14) | 22.3 | 28.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | 2.4% | -13.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 34.6% | -11.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 41.5% | 67.4% |
Risk
AMD is the more resilient| Metric | AMD | WDC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.2 | 3.03 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.51 | 1.67 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.55 | 2.76 |
| Max drawdown | -27.8% | -55.5% |
| Current drawdown | -17.7% | -51.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 67.9% | 81% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.8% | -8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AMD or WDC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, WDC is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 43 against AMD's 36. The edge comes from quality and value. AMD is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AMD or WDC the better buy right now?
WDC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor WDC over AMD?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. WDC leads Quality by 27 points; AMD leads Risk Resilience by 13 points; WDC leads Value by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AMD or WDC?
Analyst price targets imply +4.9% upside for AMD and +51.9% for WDC, so the Street currently favors WDC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AMD or WDC?
WDC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. WDC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AMD or WDC?
AMD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AMD or WDC?
AMD on the Momentum factor, by 6 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AMD or WDC?
AMD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AMD on Risk Resilience, by 13 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AMD more profitable than WDC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 53.2% vs 48.9%; operating margin 15.7% vs 34.9%; ttm roe 10.1% vs 118.6%. AMD leads on one measure and WDC on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is WDC's lead over AMD getting stronger or weaker?
WDC lead: Reversed — AMD led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; WDC now leads by 7. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-12, when WDC moved ahead of AMD.
What would change the AMD vs WDC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AMD closes the Quality gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to WDC's edge; AMD's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; WDC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AMD and WDC?
AMD: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. WDC: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AMD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On WDC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AMD and WDC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.