ARCC vs DX Stock Comparison
DX currently leads ARCC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 49 vs 46. The clearest difference is value, while ARCC has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between ARCC and DX?
DX leads the current stock comparison as Dynex Capital, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Ares Capital Corporation vs Dynex Capital, Inc.
DX leads
DX leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from ARCC.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support DX, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Ares Capital Corporation
Dynex Capital, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DX over ARCC, 49 versus 46 as of Oct 21, 2026. DX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while ARCC holds the stronger risk resilience profile. DX also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. DX lead: Reversed — ARCC led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; DX now leads by 3.
Compare Ares Capital Corporation and Dynex Capital, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare ARCC and DX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value47 vs 67DX +20
- Risk Resilience58 vs 38ARCC +20
- Momentum31 vs 38DX +7
- Quality50 vs 47Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor DX. DX’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; ARCC keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +13
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
DX's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ARCC and DX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DX (Dynex Capital, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation): the counter-case, on risk resilience, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DXDX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DXDX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DXDX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
DXDX on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.
Lower downside
ARCCARCC on Risk Resilience, by 20 points.
Analyst upside
DXDX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | ARCC | DX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +3.3% | +23.7% | DX has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +18.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | ARCC | DX |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 3.71% | 3.59% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $1.600 | $1.660 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $1.920 | $1.980 |
| Years increased | — | 1 |
| No cut in window | — | No (2) |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | not ranked |
ARCC grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 3.71% a year against DX's 3.59%. They are ranked in different cohorts — business development companies and REITs — so their ranks are not comparable with each other.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 46 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | DXon balance | revenue growth 120.1% vs 17.6%; EPS growth 84.6% vs 295.1%; TTM ROE 6.8% vs 16.9%; gross margin 67% vs 76.4%; operating margin 62.9% vs 101.8% — DX takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DX | Value 47 vs 67 |
| Technicals | ARCC | Price vs 50-day -5.2% vs -8.4%; vs 200-day -3.1% vs -15.9% |
| Risk Resilience | ARCC | Risk Resilience 58 vs 38 |
| Analyst expectations | DX | Target upside 3.3% vs 23.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ARCC and DX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20DX lead: Reversed — ARCC led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; DX now leads by 3.
- Today
- DX +3
- 46 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- DX +2
- 47 vs 49
- 30 sessions ago
- ARCC +1
- 48 vs 47
- 90 sessions ago
- ARCC +7
- 63 vs 56
The lead changed hands 8 times in this window, most recently on Sep 30 when DX moved ahead of ARCC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only ARCC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.62%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only DX
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (8.02%)
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (2.7%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze.
DX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.59%, AIQ +2 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.82%, AIQ +3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ARCC closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to DX's edge.
- 2ARCC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3DX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
DX leads on balance| Metric | ARCC | DX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 120.1% | 17.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 84.6% | 295.1% |
| Gross margin | 67% | 76.4% |
| Operating margin | 62.9% | 101.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 6.8% | 16.9% |
| Debt to equity | 1.14 | 7.13 |
Performance
ARCC leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | ARCC | DX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.3% | 1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.4% | -9.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -1.9% | -15.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -2.4% | -19.8% |
| Year to date | -8.5% | -21.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -5.2% | -17% |
Technicals
ARCC has the stronger structure| Metric | ARCC | DX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 37.4 | 46 |
| ADX (14) | 24.7 | 41.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.2% | -8.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -3.1% | -15.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 16% | 30.1% |
Risk
ARCC is the more resilient| Metric | ARCC | DX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.67 | 0.58 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.38 | -1.18 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.57 | -1.63 |
| Max drawdown | -17% | -28.4% |
| Current drawdown | -12% | -25.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 19.2% | 18.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.1% | -1.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ARCC or DX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 49 against ARCC's 46. The edge comes from value and momentum. ARCC is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ARCC or DX the better buy right now?
DX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DX over ARCC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DX leads Value by 20 points; ARCC leads Risk Resilience by 20 points; DX leads Momentum by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ARCC or DX?
Analyst price targets imply +3.3% upside for ARCC and +23.7% for DX, so the Street currently favors DX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ARCC or DX?
DX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ARCC or DX?
DX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ARCC or DX?
DX on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ARCC or DX?
ARCC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ARCC on Risk Resilience, by 20 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ARCC more profitable than DX?
DX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 67% vs 76.4%; operating margin 62.9% vs 101.8%; ttm roe 6.8% vs 16.9%.
Is DX's lead over ARCC getting stronger or weaker?
DX lead: Reversed — ARCC led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; DX now leads by 3. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 8 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-30, when DX moved ahead of ARCC.
What would change the ARCC vs DX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ARCC closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to DX's edge; ARCC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; DX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ARCC and DX?
ARCC: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. DX: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ARCC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On DX it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare ARCC and DX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.